veggieman001 wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
Murdoch's company does not control most newspapers and "'official' news sources". Although they control several large ones, there is still a lot of untarnished information out there not on the internet and we need to preserve the legacy of the newspaper, to let it not die. Also, several websites are owned by Murdoch's company. Does that mean the internet is tarnished? And how do you know which sites to trust on the internet?
I certainly know not to trust "theworldaccordingtomurdoch.com" but wikinews.com seems to be pretty unbiased.
And yes, there are certainly many good newspapers out there, and the fact that people can now publish newspapers by releasing to newsstand or some other online newspaper site has increased freeness of speech and decreased the government's hold on the media.First of all, wikinews.org
And while it may look unbiased, you have to remember that because it's a wiki, anyone can write an article or modify an existing one.
Sorry... I typed that hurriedly...
True, but same with Wikipedia.
And take this discussion that we are having now. Do you think the government would let us have this discussion live on prime time television? I don't think so.
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
I certainly know not to trust "theworldaccordingtomurdoch.com" but wikinews.com seems to be pretty unbiased.
And yes, there are certainly many good newspapers out there, and the fact that people can now publish newspapers by releasing to newsstand or some other online newspaper site has increased freeness of speech and decreased the government's hold on the media.First of all, wikinews.org
And while it may look unbiased, you have to remember that because it's a wiki, anyone can write an article or modify an existing one.Sorry... I typed that hurriedly...
True, but same with Wikipedia.
And take this discussion that we are having now. Do you think the government would let us have this discussion live on prime time television? I don't think so.
The government can't control it. :L
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
First of all, wikinews.org
And while it may look unbiased, you have to remember that because it's a wiki, anyone can write an article or modify an existing one.Sorry... I typed that hurriedly...
True, but same with Wikipedia.
And take this discussion that we are having now. Do you think the government would let us have this discussion live on prime time television? I don't think so.The government can't control it. :L
Is that what you think?
Offline
littletonkslover wrote:
we're not free
the media controls us
Correction:
The media control the ignorant.
"Oh no! DSs are used by pedophiles to track down kids because they have pictochat on and that can be used to stalk them"--Actually on Fox news.
If you believe everything the media say then you would go mad, right now in the UK it's "everything gives you cancer" year, next year it'll be "the Olympics were rigged by the Japanese, as they won and we lost" or something stupid.
Offline
my-chemical-romance wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
we're not free
the media controls usCorrection:
The media control the ignorant.
"Oh no! DSs are used by pedophiles to track down kids because they have pictochat on and that can be used to stalk them"--Actually on Fox news.
If you believe everything the media say then you would go mad, right now in the UK it's "everything gives you cancer" year, next year it'll be "the Olympics were rigged by the Japanese, as they won and we lost" or something stupid.
whether you believe everything they say or not it doesn't matter.
it still influences us in some abstract way or another.
look around you, big name brands smother the mall's interior. the most popular places are probably ones that were carried around by the media/other people
Offline
my-chemical-romance wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
we're not free
the media controls usCorrection:
The media control the ignorant.
"Oh no! DSs are used by pedophiles to track down kids because they have pictochat on and that can be used to stalk them"--Actually on Fox news.
If you believe everything the media say then you would go mad, right now in the UK it's "everything gives you cancer" year, next year it'll be "the Olympics were rigged by the Japanese, as they won and we lost" or something stupid.
Yea that's right!
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
Sorry... I typed that hurriedly...
True, but same with Wikipedia.
And take this discussion that we are having now. Do you think the government would let us have this discussion live on prime time television? I don't think so.The government can't control it. :L
Is that what you think?
yes i truly believe that they can't stop it
people can say whatever they want on tv and radio
unless it's like excessive swearing which has to be after the watershed but whatever
but if some guy can rant about how hawaii isn't in the us and so obama isn't a us citizen at lunchtime, i think i'd be able to say this on public television
Offline
Offline
brettman98 wrote:
free speech?
jji7skyline eats babies!
jk...
or am I?
I will exercise my right of free speech and say "I don't"
Offline
On scratch we don't have free speech, that's for sure... look at how much is censored.
Meanwhile lets discuss how we all can't wait 'til Obama isn't president. Who else thinks Obama is a bad president?
Offline
littletonkslover wrote:
my-chemical-romance wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
we're not free
the media controls usCorrection:
The media control the ignorant.
"Oh no! DSs are used by pedophiles to track down kids because they have pictochat on and that can be used to stalk them"--Actually on Fox news.
If you believe everything the media say then you would go mad, right now in the UK it's "everything gives you cancer" year, next year it'll be "the Olympics were rigged by the Japanese, as they won and we lost" or something stupid.whether you believe everything they say or not it doesn't matter.
it still influences us in some abstract way or another.
look around you, big name brands smother the mall's interior. the most popular places are probably ones that were carried around by the media/other people
So what? If I eat a mcdonalds I won't suddenly pay 500% more tax because I feel like it.
Offline
Daroach1 wrote:
On scratch we don't have free speech, that's for sure... look at how much is censored.
Meanwhile lets discuss how we all can't wait 'til Obama isn't president. Who else thinks Obama is a bad president?
I do.
But Paulitics are not allowed on Scratch.
The Scratch team can make rules about their site. They don't have to let us on if we talk about things they don't like. They have freedom too!
I support the 1st ammendment:
-free speech
-free assembly
-free press
-free religion
Offline
PoDo wrote:
In some places sites on the internet are blocked. Like in China.
Poor chinese people. They don't have complete access to the internet.
They can only access government approved websites...
Thought-control and propaganda >,<
Offline
Everything is being controlled, for we live in a Matrix, not unlike that of the movie. In fact, even the movie was created to make it seem like we were free. But now I ask you: What is the need for control of the sort, if They can already access our minds o.O
Last edited by randomnumber53 (2011-11-15 22:14:18)
Offline
Offline
Religion controls the masses, we're taught not to cheat, suicide, kill another being and many other things, yet it creates wars between 2 religions which normally end up in genocide.
Offline
:co
Not completely free, as someone said. Only half.
Offline
scimonster wrote:
:co
Not completely free, as someone said. Only half.
lol, your sig tricked me!
But on the Internet, you are free to say what you mean. No one can stop you from doing that. It's just that some of your post may get censored, not that you aren't saying what you want to say.
Offline