really, I think that scratch should delete the top remixed on the front page. seriously, creating projects for people to remix and draw a picture just so they can get on the front page? I think that's spam in a way. and also, someone could also remix one of his projects several times to get top remixed.
Offline
alexpja wrote:
I agree. Then, they could expand the Newest Projects cause each project stays on the page for 3 min
yeah, i know, but people still don't put enough effort into their projects, even if they didn't make projects to get in top remixed.
Offline
true. Maybe, the system should look over every new project and see if it is worthless. Then, the scratch homepage would be better
Offline
alexpja wrote:
true. Maybe, the system should look over every new project and see if it is worthless. Then, the scratch homepage would be better
yeah, that's a good idea.
Offline
scratchcritic564 wrote:
alexpja wrote:
true. Maybe, the system should look over every new project and see if it is worthless. Then, the scratch homepage would be better
yeah, that's a good idea.
Thnks
Offline
alexpja wrote:
true. Maybe, the system should look over every new project and see if it is worthless. Then, the scratch homepage would be better
Yeah, that should be better.
I'm tired of those "LOL I NEED IDEA HELPHELPHELP" or that a Cat dies or basic picture, etc.
Offline
Neo1000 wrote:
alexpja wrote:
true. Maybe, the system should look over every new project and see if it is worthless. Then, the scratch homepage would be better
Yeah, that should be better.
I'm tired of those "LOL I NEED IDEA HELPHELPHELP" or that a Cat dies or basic picture, etc.
Yea. People shouldn't spam like that. Then, the server would crash with too many projects like that. Right?
Offline
alexpja wrote:
true. Maybe, the system should look over every new project and see if it is worthless. Then, the scratch homepage would be better
It would work, but someone would have to be on all the time to look at all the projects because it would be hard to make it check automatically.
Offline
hmnwilson wrote:
alexpja wrote:
true. Maybe, the system should look over every new project and see if it is worthless. Then, the scratch homepage would be better
It would work, but someone would have to be on all the time to look at all the projects because it would be hard to make it check automatically.
i meant like a computer
Offline
alexpja wrote:
hmnwilson wrote:
alexpja wrote:
true. Maybe, the system should look over every new project and see if it is worthless. Then, the scratch homepage would be better
It would work, but someone would have to be on all the time to look at all the projects because it would be hard to make it check automatically.
i meant like a computer
How would it work though? If it just checked the number of scripts you could add a whole lot of pointless scripts in...
Offline
yeah it is pointless cause i just got on top remixed because im making lots of versions of my new game
Offline
hmnwilson wrote:
alexpja wrote:
hmnwilson wrote:
It would work, but someone would have to be on all the time to look at all the projects because it would be hard to make it check automatically.i meant like a computer
How would it work though? If it just checked the number of scripts you could add a whole lot of pointless scripts in...
Ugh. I meant like check the whole project and look if it has violent stuff and stuff that is bad.
Offline
alexpja wrote:
hmnwilson wrote:
alexpja wrote:
i meant like a computerHow would it work though? If it just checked the number of scripts you could add a whole lot of pointless scripts in...
Ugh. I meant like check the whole project and look if it has violent stuff and stuff that is bad.
or just see if it had any effort put into it.
Offline
scratchcritic564 wrote:
alexpja wrote:
hmnwilson wrote:
How would it work though? If it just checked the number of scripts you could add a whole lot of pointless scripts in...Ugh. I meant like check the whole project and look if it has violent stuff and stuff that is bad.
or just see if it had any effort put into it.
well technically effort could be put into something just it wouldn't be very good
Offline
alexpja wrote:
true. Maybe, the system should look over every new project and see if it is worthless. Then, the scratch homepage would be better
This is a begginer site, so if we were to delete the "useless" projects, there would be a lot of dejected feelings about. Also complications with the automated delete, how would it be able to tell? someone's maste piece could dissapear with a error and then that person would think the her/his project was worthless, when truely, thats how people learn. Progressively. So, I am against it.
Offline
726961 wrote:
alexpja wrote:
true. Maybe, the system should look over every new project and see if it is worthless. Then, the scratch homepage would be better
This is a begginer site, so if we were to delete the "useless" projects, there would be a lot of dejected feelings about. Also complications with the automated delete, how would it be able to tell? someone's maste piece could dissapear with a error and then that person would think the her/his project was worthless, when truely, thats how people learn. Progressively. So, I am against it.
no, not to delete them, just don't put them on the front page in newest projects.
Offline