Scratch

I did: http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Borrego6165/2007035

Borrego6165 wrote:

I did: http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Borrego6165/2007035

Cool!

Clank23 wrote:

I am back and I have upgraded the graphics now!so can you review the graphics again?
Edit:I also now added sound.

I'd say music= 7
and Graphics= 8

ScareCrowCritic wrote:

Hey, I could help review. (I'm not new, this account is.)

Sorry, but I don't really require any help right now. If you want, I'll help you start your own ratings thread.

urhungry wrote:

Could you rate Blue Pixel when you get the chance? The link is in my signature. There is no music, but that's only because I am terrible at making music. Thanks!

I'll rate this, as now I will rate games every Tuesdays and Thursdays alongside pokegar. If you would like a rating from her, you could say so    I hope my ratings are good enough for you, though, I'll try my best. So here goes:

Graphics: 4/10
Programming: 6/10
Plot: 4/10
"Fun-ness": 8/10

Overall: 22/40 - 0.55 - ★★★ (3 stars)

What a simple yet fun game. I mean there's no plot, no music, not very good graphics, but that simplicity is what makes the game so great! I decided to throw in the "Fun-ness" category since under Pokegar's current scoring system, the game would have too low a score than it should deserve. Once you've started playing, you just can't stop until you have the high score.  I would like to comment on one thing, however: the arrow keys don't control the player properly. Instead of going straight up or down, it goes at 45 degree angles, which is confusing if you use arrow keys. I suggest using letter keys instead as most keyboards have them at angles. I wouldn't change the way the player moves, moving at an angle is great, but since arrow keys suggest moving straight up, down, left, or right, it can get confusing. Also, you should get into the habit of forming longer scripts instead of many short scripts as that can become less reliable and messy for larger, more complex projects.

Summary: A very very simple yet fun game that just needs some technical tweaks. 

Can you rate this please?
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/rontoking/2012697

rontoking wrote:

Can you rate this please?
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/rontoking/2012697

Not really much of a game, more of a simulation, but I'll try. Also, I don't play minecraft, so this might not be the rating you'd expect.

Plot: 1/5
Graphics: 6/10
Programming: 7/10
Fun-ness: 5/10

Overall: 19/35 - 0.54 - ★★★ (3 stars)

This seems to be a very simple program. Graphics are okay, but what's pulling you down is that you don't have an animation for the person. The programming is a bit simple, you could have made a save system by saving the grid onto a list. Also, maybe you should have added a highlight showing where your current block is (if it's inside several blocks, you can't tell where it is. There is not much plot. And as it's not much of a game, there's little fun.

Summary: sorry if this review wasn't what you expected but I don't get it that much and i'm kind of in the hurry. Maybe you should expand the features a bit. Good luck and happy programming 

Good Luck

cygene wrote:

Thanks for taking up the ratings while I am busy. You do great, and you're quite good at this! I feel glad that someone is here to help me. ;)

Can you review my Stencyl game? http://www.stencyl.com/game/play/6545

p.s. Out of curiosity...did you manage to get all the points? I'm particularly proud of the fly with the randomized flight path that can be triggered in the room with the painting.

jjhunter wrote:

p.s. Out of curiosity...did you manage to get all the points? I'm particularly proud of the fly with the randomized flight path that can be triggered in the room with the painting.

I don't think so. Cool, you randomized it? That sounds really epic.

kayybee wrote:

Sure, why not rate my game. It's my newest one, multiple choice quiz template.

Programming: 7/10
Graphics: 4/10
Fun-ness: 6/10

Overall: 17/30 = 0.56% ★★★☆☆ (3 star)

A pretty neat tool to use, really. The programming is quite good. I like how concise it is, and good job using lists to store answers! I also like how user-friendly the programming is, so that others can easily create quizzes using that template, though you could have added some in-project comments as a guide instead of making a forum post about it. It could be cleaned up a bit, and I'm personally a fan of using less scripts, but making them longer. The most it is lacking in, though, is graphics. You could have made some animations like fading in and out between questions, or making a choice highlight if the mouse is on it. Not too difficult, but I'm guessing you wanted the person using the template for a quiz to make the graphics themselves.

Overall, pretty nice. Very user-friendly but could have some better graphics.
PS: I like the idea of using this for school presentations, like a quiz at the end, but I already use powerpoint for that (yes, you can make multiple choice quizzes).

Hello, you may remember me from my game Raw Sushi: Cowboy Style, which you've reviewed with an agreeable score. Now, I made a second game; Theory 1.

I hope you enjoy it, but its quite short due to the fact its just an introduction to the Theory series, but I decided it would be a game instead of some text.