cpumaster930 wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
cpumaster930 wrote:
Not particularly, but I'm taking Physics this year.
I've taken Bio and Chem though![]()
I'm taking Physics this year also.
How about...
Reduce the Fraction: 4x(x+2)^2-2x^2(x+2)/(x+2)^3That's a little confusing to be written on one line...do you think you could go into MS Paint or something like that, neatly draw out the equation as it appears on whatever worksheet the problem is from, upload the image to imgur or tinypic, and post it here? Then I'd be able to understand it
![]()
How about I make a scratch project?

Offline
JJROCKER wrote:
cpumaster930 wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
I'm taking Physics this year also.
How about...
Reduce the Fraction: 4x(x+2)^2-2x^2(x+2)/(x+2)^3That's a little confusing to be written on one line...do you think you could go into MS Paint or something like that, neatly draw out the equation as it appears on whatever worksheet the problem is from, upload the image to imgur or tinypic, and post it here? Then I'd be able to understand it
![]()
How about I make a scratch project?
That would work
Offline
cpumaster930 wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
cpumaster930 wrote:
That's a little confusing to be written on one line...do you think you could go into MS Paint or something like that, neatly draw out the equation as it appears on whatever worksheet the problem is from, upload the image to imgur or tinypic, and post it here? Then I'd be able to understand it![]()
How about I make a scratch project?
That would work
![]()

Offline
cpumaster930 wrote:
http://www4c.wolframalpha.com/Calculate … 2&h=44
Is this correct? I'd just like to confirm that before I start explaining it![]()
Correct.

Offline
cpumaster930 wrote:
http://www4c.wolframalpha.com/Calculate … 2&h=44
Is this correct? I'd just like to confirm that before I start explaining it![]()
I have another question so I'll make a project for it.

Offline
Offline
Ok, here goes.
First, you can cancel one (x+2) from the bottom term and one (x+2) from each of the top terms, resulting in:
Second, you could separate into two terms, like this:
Cancel out one (x+2) from the top and bottom of the first term to get
I don't see anything else you can cancel there, although WolframAlpha insists that the result is
That was quite a tricky one...maybe there's something that I missed?
Offline
You should try learning the type-setting language LaTeX. It used by many mathematicians to display equations. You can read more about it here: http://www.latex-project.org/.
EDIT: The above comment was directed at JJRocker.
EDIT: You can factor by grouping. You can make 4x -> -2x(-2) and then use the distributive property to make one multiplicity statement. I'd TeX this, but I do not have LaTeX on this computer.
Last edited by demosthenes (2011-09-06 15:25:51)
Offline
cpumaster930 wrote:
Ok, here goes.
![]()
http://www4c.wolframalpha.com/Calculate … 2&h=44
First, you can cancel one (x+2) from the bottom term and one (x+2) from each of the top terms, resulting in:
http://www2.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/ … 1&h=43
Second, you could separate into two terms, like this:
http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate … 8&h=43
Cancel out one (x+2) from the top and bottom of the first term to get
http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate … 6&h=43
I don't see anything else you can cancel there, although WolframAlpha insists that the result is
http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate … 8&h=40
That was quite a tricky one...maybe there's something that I missed?
Mine says the answer is 2x(x^2+4)
(x+2)^2

Offline
JJROCKER wrote:
So that would be , given that x^1/2 is the square root of x and y^1/4 is the fourth root of y.
The 100 and 81 coefficients look like the difference of two squares. What makes this problem a bit harder than (10x+9y)(10x-9y) are the exponents.
If you take a half of 1/2, because you add exponents when you multiply, you get 10x^1/4, and taking half of 1/4, you get 9y^1/8.
WolframAlpha doesn't want to put it into fractional exponent notation, but here:
In text, though, it's
(10x^1/4+9y^1/8)(10x^1/4-9y^1/8)
I checked that result with W|A and it's correct ;D
And thanks, demosthenes, for that link--I'll be sure to check it out soon
Last edited by cpumaster930 (2011-09-06 15:27:21)
Offline
cpumaster930 wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
So that would be http://www2.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/ … 3&h=23, given that x^1/2 is the square root of x and y^1/4 is the fourth root of y.
The 100 and 81 coefficients look like the difference of two squares. What makes this problem a bit harder than (10x+9y)(10x-9y) are the exponents.
If you take a half of 1/2, because you add exponents when you multiply, you get 10x^1/4, and taking half of 1/4, you get 9y^1/8.
WolframAlpha doesn't want to put it into fractional exponent notation, but here:
http://www4c.wolframalpha.com/Calculate … &h=32p
In text, though, it's
(10x^1/4+9y^1/8)(10x^1/4-9y^1/8)
I checked that result with W|A and it's correct ;D
And thanks, demosthenes, for that link--I'll be sure to check it out soon![]()
ok thanks! I get it! Awesome. Also, what is the thing demosthenes linked to?

Offline
..Adventure?
Offline
Isn't it just 1/(3x^2)? That was easy. Now find the derivative!
Offline
randomnumber53 wrote:
Isn't it just 1/(3x^2)? That was easy. Now find the derivative!
-(1/6)x^(-3)
btw im 11
Offline
parcheesidude wrote:
randomnumber53 wrote:
Isn't it just 1/(3x^2)? That was easy. Now find the derivative!
-(1/6)x^(-3)
btw im 11
Whatever-- I'm bad at vocabulary. Plus I haven't done that stuff for 3 YEARS and I'm 14, so, we're even
Offline