Scratch

Judging by my signature, we can all agree I'm on the Twilight side [/sarcasm].

brettman98 wrote:

Wickimen wrote:

Judging by my signature, we can all agree I'm on the Twilight side [/sarcasm].

I didn't know earwax made you a Twilight fan 

The earwax-flavored Bertie Botts' Bean 

soupoftomato wrote:

Put it all here I guess since we've been driven out of the thread we were using and I like debating this. 

So which is better and why?

I think it depends on what the user is interested in. ^^

You know I'd like to see someone who is both a Harry Potter and Twilight fan to give his/her point of view. Less bias ftw. 

Last edited by cheddargirl (2011-07-18 17:01:48)

Harry Potter wins. Twilight is just stupid. Seriously, sparkling vampires? What kind of vampire sparkles? Vampires are supposed to be evil creatures, not weak creatures that are made out of sequins and glitter. 

Wickimen wrote:

GravityCatisalie wrote:

Wickimen wrote:

The earwax-flavored Bertie Botts' Bean 

I once ate a puke flavored one D:

Moldy cheese and skunk spray are bad too 0_0
But I was talking about that part at the end of Book one. It's one of my favorite Dumbledore quotes.

Yeah, I knew you were referencing that.

  Really people. You won't convince someone that your book is better than theirs. True fans will stay fans no matter what others say. I, for one, have not and will not read either.

lilacfuzz101 wrote:

  Really people. You won't convince someone that your book is better than theirs. True fans will stay fans no matter what others say. I, for one, have not and will not read either.

It's just fun to discuss.

And seriously? What in Merlin's saggy left- I mean what made you decide to not read either.

bananaman114 wrote:

Yer' a vampire, Edward.

But but I'm . . . just . . . Edward.

And the whole red thing, even I know he's a vampire. 

Last edited by soupoftomato (2011-07-18 20:33:45)

Although I don't like any of them, Twilight and Harry Potter have nothing in common, except for that fact they're both darkly-themed. This debate is useless. Since when did wizards and vampires go along the same line? 

...Just saying.

Last edited by PandaGuy (2011-07-18 20:45:26)

Necromaster wrote:

Harry Potter. The Twilight series is all cult vampire action and has really no story. Harry Potter on the other hand is actually well thought out. Unlike the Vampire Werewolf counterpart...

And just to further explain my point, they're not counterparts. Like I said, they have nothing in common. 

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

lilacfuzz101 wrote:

  Really people. You won't convince someone that your book is better than theirs. True fans will stay fans no matter what others say. I, for one, have not and will not read either.

I VOTE FOR YOU FOR PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD!!! 

She's voted president of the world for not reading Twilight?

You are confusing one.

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

I VOTE FOR YOU FOR PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD!!! 

She's voted president of the world for not reading Twilight?

You are confusing one.

She speaks wisdom that is the hardcore truth!!!

It's still fun to discuss.