Scratch

Ace-Of-Hearts wrote:

urhungry wrote:

If that is true I will be unhappy. That's five days before my birthday, and I want my presents before the end of the world.

My birthday is close to that too. Lots of May/June birthdays around here

wow, my b-day is may 30th.    wow

Sunrise-Moon wrote:

Does anyone actually believe this? I personally don't. I mean, they even said zombies will overrun the earth.

Those who died unsaved will be raised up as well, but only to have their lifeless bodies scattered about the face of all the earth. Death will be everywhere.

Also, where do they get their dates? They just say that something happened in a year, but don't say how they know this.

Lol whut

imsosuperswell1 wrote:

Only a few of those reasons in that link are reasonable. But it does have good proof.

It was a joke.

Pecola1 wrote:

12three wrote:

imsosuperswell1 wrote:

Then it would of happened in 2010, but we are in 2011. They added a extra year for a reason that dosen't really matter. AHA!!!

Facepalm
did you read it? There is no 0ad so you take away a year from 4990. Dude come on get a third grade reading comprehension level.

That was uncalled for. Let's be nicer to each-other. All you needed to say is to point out the reason why, and even then imsosuperswell1 may have meant that there being no 0 ad isn't enough of a reason to call it a reason at all! Just because there isn't an 0 ad for humans doesn't mean that the world will end a year later.

I'm explaining the rational. And I do think that thits person needs a higher comp level so I said it. Problem?

777w wrote:

Everyone assumes the world ends when WE end. Not nessicarily...

I've always thought the same thing. When the human race is gone, the rest of the universe will keep on going like nothing ever happened.

On that note, I think this whole thing is ludicrous. If you read the "logic" they use, the assumptions they make are really quite outlandish; it's only one preposterous conclusion on top of another several layers thick. If you want to read an article on the way they came to this conclusion, you can find it here.

I'd like to also say that I don't intend to insult the intelligence of Christians or the validity of their beliefs. Obviously the people making these claims are not indicative of most Christians out there. I'm just baffled at how they can make so many crazy connections and assumptions while glossing over verses that quite clearly state "No one knows when that day or hour will come" (Matthew 24:36)

/rant

Pecola1 wrote:

blazerv82 wrote:

bananaman114 wrote:

What's next?
*spins random wheel*
Aha! It landed on 2099!
2099 IS THE END OF THE WORLD! THE WHEEL SAID SO!

*spins again*
It landed on 3003! 3003 is plan B, if 2099 fails.

In all seriousness, nothing is going to happen. Nothing ever happened in...whatever those many other years where the world was going to end, such as Y2K.

Wait! The wheel only has 9999 stops! That's unfair, it needs to be an even number! Lets make that with eight stops the wheel went around five times so we need to subtract 5 from it, THE WORLD WILL END 2998 (if 2099 fails)! I WILL BE DEAD BY THEN! (wait, if the world is ending then won't everyone? XD)

I'm sure that the fundamentalists wouldn't agree.

Just in case you haven't noticed, there is rationale behind this one. You just can't respect that, not that I care, but this is the second time I've seen a similar post to this in this topic.

Last edited by 12three (2011-05-18 19:50:51)

Wait a second, what happened to that 2012 thing?

12three wrote:

Harakou wrote:

777w wrote:

Everyone assumes the world ends when WE end. Not nessicarily...

I've always thought the same thing. When the human race is gone, the rest of the universe will keep on going like nothing ever happened.

On that note, I think this whole thing is ludicrous. If you read the "logic" they use, the assumptions they make are really quite outlandish; it's only one preposterous conclusion on top of another several layers thick. If you want to read an article on the way they came to this conclusion, you can find it here.

I'd like to also say that I don't intend to insult the intelligence of Christians or the validity of their beliefs. Obviously the people making these claims are not indicative of most Christians out there. I'm just baffled at how they can make so many crazy connections and assumptions while glossing over verses that quite clearly state "No one knows when that day or hour will come" (Matthew 24:36)

/rant

Also, the human race deserves to die. We're messing up a beautiful world that is the Power's creation, not ours. Post Industrial society resulted in a mess.

Of course this power is unprovable and should not be mentioned on Scratch. Unless you mean Mother Nature of course.

12three wrote:

Pecola1 wrote:

12three wrote:

I'm explaining the rational. And I do think that thits person needs a higher comp level so I said it. Problem?

momma lucy wrote:

If you don't have something nice to say YOU KEEP YOU'R MOUTH CLOSED!

If you want to supress the truth then leave.

I just tell you to be nicer and you tell me to leave? If this gets any farther than they're going to close this for sure.

I am just telling you not to be so mean, and you act like you had the right to be mean because it was true.

A great guy told me once if it isn't kind, or it isn't true, or it isn't necessary, then don't say it.

What you said
kind - no
true - yes
necessary - no

Pecola1 wrote:

12three wrote:

Pecola1 wrote:

12three wrote:

I'm explaining the rational. And I do think that thits person needs a higher comp level so I said it. Problem?

If you want to supress the truth then leave.

I just tell you to be nicer and you tell me to leave? If this gets any farther than they're going to close this for sure.

I am just telling you not to be so mean, and you act like you had the right to be mean because it was true.

A great guy told me once if it isn't kind, or it isn't true, or it isn't necessary, then don't say it.

What you said
kind - no
true - yes
necessary - no

we should all listen to momma lucy

Pecola1 wrote:

12three wrote:

Pecola1 wrote:

12three wrote:

I'm explaining the rational. And I do think that thits person needs a higher comp level so I said it. Problem?

If you want to supress the truth then leave.

I just tell you to be nicer and you tell me to leave? If this gets any farther than they're going to close this for sure.

I am just telling you not to be so mean, and you act like you had the right to be mean because it was true.

A great guy told me once if it isn't kind, or it isn't true, or it isn't necessary, then don't say it.

What you said
kind - no
true - yes
necessary - yes

Pecola1 wrote:

12three wrote:

Pecola1 wrote:

I just tell you to be nicer and you tell me to leave? If this gets any farther than they're going to close this for sure.

I am just telling you not to be so mean, and you act like you had the right to be mean because it was true.

A great guy told me once if it isn't kind, or it isn't true, or it isn't necessary, then don't say it.

What you said
kind - no
true - yes
necessary - yes

LOL its debatable, why do you think it IS necessary? BTW If it is in anyway debatable for necessary, that means it most likely is necessary, your right.

Because I'm tired of human ignorance. It wastes time and time is something we as humans don't have.