Scratch

fire219 · 2011-04-24 12:40:35

The ESE is online! big_smile

scratcher7_13 · 2011-04-24 14:20:27

What does SIMPL-DOS stand for? (If it stands for anything.)

fire219 · 2011-04-25 16:45:04

scratcher7_13 wrote:
What does SIMPL-DOS stand for? (If it stands for anything.)

The SIMPL part of course, means "simple", and originally, SIMPL-DOS was simple and very lightweight (2-3 KB, compared to 24 KB for 0.42). the DOS part, well, you can probably figure that part out. wink

WindozeNT · 2011-04-25 17:29:38

fire219 wrote:
scratcher7_13 wrote:
What does SIMPL-DOS stand for? (If it stands for anything.)
The SIMPL part of course, means "simple", and originally, SIMPL-DOS was simple and very lightweight (2-3 KB, compared to 24 KB for 0.42). the DOS part, well, you can probably figure that part out.

Except SIMPL-DOS does not run on disks, unless you fix that bootsector issue.

meowmeow55 · 2011-04-25 17:47:06

WindozeNT wrote:
fire219 wrote:
scratcher7_13 wrote:
What does SIMPL-DOS stand for? (If it stands for anything.)
The SIMPL part of course, means "simple", and originally, SIMPL-DOS was simple and very lightweight (2-3 KB, compared to 24 KB for 0.42). the DOS part, well, you can probably figure that part out.
Except SIMPL-DOS does not run on disks, unless you fix that bootsector issue.

That was never an issue at all, it was just a fail on fire219's part. And it always runs on some sort of disk wink

bbbeb · 2011-04-25 17:47:45

Can i get a source of SDB?

meowmeow55 · 2011-04-25 17:49:38

bbbeb wrote:
Can i get a source of SDB?

Maybe. The only issue we have is with the illegal character checker in the text editor, and we need to clean up documentation. (Though I presume you won't need that wink )

fire219 · 2011-04-26 16:40:47

meowmeow55 wrote:
bbbeb wrote:
Can i get a source of SDB?
Maybe. The only issue we have is with the illegal character checker in the text editor, and we need to clean up documentation. (Though I presume you won't need that )

Really, we could just take out the illegal char checker code, and finally release SDB.

@bbbeb Yes, if we can find a way to get it to you. (The ST would not appreciate you posting your email tongue )

meowmeow55 wrote:
That was never an issue at all, it was just a fail on fire219's part. And it always runs on some sort of disk

Yes, that was a fail. I'm only human. tongue

fire219 · 2011-04-29 17:04:43

bump.

bbbeb · 2011-04-29 18:47:21

fire219 wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
bbbeb wrote:
Can i get a source of SDB?
Maybe. The only issue we have is with the illegal character checker in the text editor, and we need to clean up documentation. (Though I presume you won't need that )
Really, we could just take out the illegal char checker code, and finally release SDB.

@bbbeb Yes, if we can find a way to get it to you. (The ST would not appreciate you posting your email )

meowmeow55 wrote:
That was never an issue at all, it was just a fail on fire219's part. And it always runs on some sort of disk
Yes, that was a fail. I'm only human.

Hows about a proxy email?
(I have only used like once ever)
send it to ---

TBH i used it to exploit Facebook's non-IP checking self for more than one account.

Last edited by bbbeb (2011-07-05 22:29:26)

fire219 · 2011-04-29 20:49:03

bbbeb wrote:
fire219 wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:

Maybe. The only issue we have is with the illegal character checker in the text editor, and we need to clean up documentation. (Though I presume you won't need that )
Really, we could just take out the illegal char checker code, and finally release SDB.

@bbbeb Yes, if we can find a way to get it to you. (The ST would not appreciate you posting your email )

meowmeow55 wrote:
That was never an issue at all, it was just a fail on fire219's part. And it always runs on some sort of disk
Yes, that was a fail. I'm only human.
Hows about a proxy email?
(I have only used like once ever)
send it to awesomelyxtreme@gmail.com

TBH i used it to exploit Facebook's non-IP checking self for more than one account.

Ok, sent. smile

fire219 · 2011-04-30 17:16:45

bump

fire219 · 2011-05-01 09:55:35

bump.

I am planning to move the SIMPL-DOS website to 000webhost. Anyone have opinions about if I should move it, or stick with webs?

thebuilderdd · 2011-05-01 15:14:39

fire219 wrote:
bump.

I am planning to move the SIMPL-DOS website to 000webhost. Anyone have opinions about if I should move it, or stick with webs?

000webhost.

fire219 · 2011-05-03 16:43:32

bump

WindozeNT · 2011-05-04 18:26:28

fire219 wrote:
bump

Stay with Webs, dude. I have too many website accounts open as it is.
And try to help with Melanie and Me if you can.

Last edited by WindozeNT (2011-05-04 18:27:23)

thebuilderdd · 2011-05-04 18:30:43

Can I join the SIMPL-DOS team? I just need a link to learn Batch. I can help make you guys a website with a blog AND forums!

meowmeow55 · 2011-05-04 18:36:09

thebuilderdd wrote:
Can I join the SIMPL-DOS team? I just need a link to learn Batch. I can help make you guys a website with a blog AND forums!

We have both already tongue . And as for your second sentence, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DOS_commands and google.com. ( tongue )

thebuilderdd · 2011-05-04 19:48:42

meowmeow55 wrote:
thebuilderdd wrote:
Can I join the SIMPL-DOS team? I just need a link to learn Batch. I can help make you guys a website with a blog AND forums!
We have both already . And as for your second sentence, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DOS_commands and google.com. ( )

Nope. Not with Webs. FluxBB (Not PunBB hosting.) And google fails. It never worked.

meowmeow55 · 2011-05-04 20:38:29

thebuilderdd wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
thebuilderdd wrote:
Can I join the SIMPL-DOS team? I just need a link to learn Batch. I can help make you guys a website with a blog AND forums!
We have both already . And as for your second sentence, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DOS_commands and google.com. ( )
Nope. Not with Webs. FluxBB (Not PunBB hosting.) And google fails. It never worked.

Wow. We already link to the SIMPL forums on my site, the "news" is a blog, and we could easily create another page/site for a blog.

thebuilderdd · 2011-05-05 18:34:57

meowmeow55 wrote:
thebuilderdd wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:

We have both already . And as for your second sentence, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DOS_commands and google.com. ( )
Nope. Not with Webs. FluxBB (Not PunBB hosting.) And google fails. It never worked.
Wow. We already link to the SIMPL forums on my site, the "news" is a blog, and we could easily create another page/site for a blog.

You would have 0% webs.

meowmeow55 · 2011-05-06 17:23:48

thebuilderdd wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
thebuilderdd wrote:

Nope. Not with Webs. FluxBB (Not PunBB hosting.) And google fails. It never worked.
Wow. We already link to the SIMPL forums on my site, the "news" is a blog, and we could easily create another page/site for a blog.
You would have 0% webs.

I'm content with 50% Webs tongue

thebuilderdd · 2011-05-06 17:40:39

meowmeow55 wrote:
thebuilderdd wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:

Wow. We already link to the SIMPL forums on my site, the "news" is a blog, and we could easily create another page/site for a blog.
You would have 0% webs.
I'm content with 50% Webs

Why use webs?

thebuilderdd · 2011-05-08 09:57:06

Should this be bumped or not?

thebuilderdd · 2011-05-08 09:59:20

bbbeb wrote:
fire219 wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:

Maybe. The only issue we have is with the illegal character checker in the text editor, and we need to clean up documentation. (Though I presume you won't need that )
Really, we could just take out the illegal char checker code, and finally release SDB.

@bbbeb Yes, if we can find a way to get it to you. (The ST would not appreciate you posting your email )

meowmeow55 wrote:
That was never an issue at all, it was just a fail on fire219's part. And it always runs on some sort of disk
Yes, that was a fail. I'm only human.
Hows about a proxy email?
(I have only used like once ever)
send it to awesomelyxtreme@gmail.com

TBH i used it to exploit Facebook's non-IP checking self for more than one account.

What is a proxy email?

Scratch

archived forums

#376 2011-04-24 12:40:35

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

#377 2011-04-24 14:20:27

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

#378 2011-04-25 16:45:04

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

scratcher7_13 wrote:

#379 2011-04-25 17:29:38

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

fire219 wrote:

scratcher7_13 wrote:

#380 2011-04-25 17:47:06

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

WindozeNT wrote:

fire219 wrote:

scratcher7_13 wrote:

#381 2011-04-25 17:47:45

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

#382 2011-04-25 17:49:38

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

bbbeb wrote:

#383 2011-04-26 16:40:47

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

meowmeow55 wrote:

bbbeb wrote:

meowmeow55 wrote:

#384 2011-04-29 17:04:43

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

#385 2011-04-29 18:47:21

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

fire219 wrote:

meowmeow55 wrote:

bbbeb wrote:

meowmeow55 wrote:

#386 2011-04-29 20:49:03

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

bbbeb wrote:

fire219 wrote:

meowmeow55 wrote:

meowmeow55 wrote:

#387 2011-04-30 17:16:45

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

#388 2011-05-01 09:55:35

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

#389 2011-05-01 15:14:39

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

fire219 wrote:

#390 2011-05-03 16:43:32

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

#391 2011-05-04 18:26:28

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

fire219 wrote:

#392 2011-05-04 18:30:43

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

#393 2011-05-04 18:36:09

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

thebuilderdd wrote:

#394 2011-05-04 19:48:42

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

meowmeow55 wrote:

thebuilderdd wrote:

#395 2011-05-04 20:38:29

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

thebuilderdd wrote:

meowmeow55 wrote:

thebuilderdd wrote:

#396 2011-05-05 18:34:57

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

meowmeow55 wrote:

thebuilderdd wrote:

meowmeow55 wrote:

#397 2011-05-06 17:23:48

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread

thebuilderdd wrote:

meowmeow55 wrote:

thebuilderdd wrote:

#398 2011-05-06 17:40:39

Re: SIMPL-DOS thread