Scratch

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-03-11 16:57:12

How about a Comment BB Code?

[comment][/comment]

Harakou · 2011-03-11 17:20:19

What would it do/look like?

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-03-15 15:05:36

Harakou wrote:
What would it do/look like?

It would allow only people who were editing it to see it.

LS97 · 2011-03-15 15:46:33

It wouldn't be a major feature, but considering it takes about 3 minutes to add something like that, I support.

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-03-16 07:37:10

LS97 wrote:
It wouldn't be a major feature, but considering it takes about 3 minutes to add something like that, I support.

Thanks. I could even code it.

scimonster · 2011-03-16 08:33:19

LS97 · 2011-03-16 08:39:49

scimonster wrote:

No, in the tradition of BBCode, [comment]like bbcode[/comment]

or something more shorthand like [!]comment[/!]

scimonster · 2011-03-16 08:42:45

LS97 wrote:
scimonster wrote:

No, in the tradition of BBCode, [comment]like bbcode[/comment]

or something more shorthand like [!]comment[/!]

I know. Act like  .

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-03-16 08:44:16

scimonster wrote:
LS97 wrote:
scimonster wrote:

No, in the tradition of BBCode, [comment]like bbcode[/comment]

or something more shorthand like [!]comment[/!]
I know. Act like  .

Yes.

LS97 · 2011-03-16 08:50:27

ProgrammingFreak wrote:
scimonster wrote:
LS97 wrote:

No, in the tradition of BBCode, [comment]like bbcode[/comment]

or something more shorthand like [!]comment[/!]
I know. Act like  .
Yes.

Why are you not on skype?

Paddle2See · 2011-03-16 08:56:14

But who would use it and under what circumstances? I'm concerned that it would be another not-obvious place that moderators would have to check for inappropriate content. So that's the downside I see...what's the upside? Who would it benefit?

LS97 · 2011-03-16 09:09:55

Paddle2See wrote:
But who would use it and under what circumstances? I'm concerned that it would be another not-obvious place that moderators would have to check for inappropriate content. So that's the downside I see...what's the upside? Who would it benefit?

I see no upside other than notes for the editors and occasionally mods.
You make a good point there, it's probably not a good idea.

scimonster · 2011-03-16 09:45:09

LS97 wrote:
Paddle2See wrote:
But who would use it and under what circumstances? I'm concerned that it would be another not-obvious place that moderators would have to check for inappropriate content. So that's the downside I see...what's the upside? Who would it benefit?
I see no upside other than notes for the editors and occasionally mods.
You make a good point there, it's probably not a good idea.

+1. tongue
Sparks had a reason for it, but... hmm

LS97 · 2011-03-16 10:20:58

can I see this? I don't know... tongue
Why does the comment make a difference?

Last edited by LS97 (2011-03-16 10:21:23)

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-03-16 11:26:27

LS97 wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
scimonster wrote:

I know. Act like  .
Yes.
Why are you not on skype?

Using my moms cpu. Shhh. jk. But this cpu doesn't have skype on it. Be on after lunch.

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-03-16 11:27:40

LS97 wrote:
can I see this? I don't know...
Why does the comment make a difference?

Comment wouldn't be transparent. It couldn't be seen. Such as on the wiki.

scimonster · 2011-03-16 14:00:46

ProgrammingFreak wrote:
LS97 wrote:
can I see this? I don't know...
Why does the comment make a difference?
Comment wouldn't be transparent. It couldn't be seen. Such as on the wiki.

Mods would have a really hard time. I support against.

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-03-16 14:07:02

scimonster wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
LS97 wrote:
can I see this? I don't know...
Why does the comment make a difference?
Comment wouldn't be transparent. It couldn't be seen. Such as on the wiki.
Mods would have a really hard time. I support against.

I suppose.

sparks · 2011-03-23 18:26:06

scimonster wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
LS97 wrote:
can I see this? I don't know...
Why does the comment make a difference?
Comment wouldn't be transparent. It couldn't be seen. Such as on the wiki.
Mods would have a really hard time. I support against.

But if no one other than the OP could actually see the notes, as in they are not copied even when quoted, then there is no need to moderate the comments! You could write all the obscenities and swear words you liked and you would be the only person able to see it! If comments cannot be seen in the post, cannot be seen when quoted and do not appear in a search result of the fora then there is no harm there, it's just like saving the text to your computer because only you can see it!

kayybee · 2011-03-23 19:32:38

Paddle2See wrote:
But who would use it and under what circumstances? I'm concerned that it would be another not-obvious place that moderators would have to check for inappropriate content. So that's the downside I see...what's the upside? Who would it benefit?

Maybe it would always show for mods?

It would be good for a guide, where it shows, but goes much into detail for very new scratchers, saving others time if they can't read the whole thing but want to get the main points.

scratch_yoshi · 2011-03-23 19:50:49

sparks wrote:
scimonster wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:

Comment wouldn't be transparent. It couldn't be seen. Such as on the wiki.
Mods would have a really hard time. I support against.
But if no one other than the OP could actually see the notes, as in they are not copied even when quoted, then there is no need to moderate the comments! You could write all the obscenities and swear words you liked and you would be the only person able to see it! If comments cannot be seen in the post, cannot be seen when quoted and do not appear in a search result of the fora then there is no harm there, it's just like saving the text to your computer because only you can see it!

Actually, mods and ST can edit posts that aren't theirs. That's how they do the whole [removed] thing.

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2011-03-11 16:57:12

Comment Code

#2 2011-03-11 17:20:19

Re: Comment Code

#3 2011-03-15 15:05:36

Re: Comment Code

Harakou wrote:

#4 2011-03-15 15:46:33

Re: Comment Code

#5 2011-03-16 07:37:10

Re: Comment Code

LS97 wrote:

#6 2011-03-16 08:33:19

Re: Comment Code

#7 2011-03-16 08:39:49

Re: Comment Code

scimonster wrote:

#8 2011-03-16 08:42:45

Re: Comment Code

LS97 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

#9 2011-03-16 08:44:16

Re: Comment Code

scimonster wrote:

LS97 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

#10 2011-03-16 08:50:27

Re: Comment Code

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

scimonster wrote:

LS97 wrote:

#11 2011-03-16 08:56:14

Re: Comment Code

#12 2011-03-16 09:09:55

Re: Comment Code

Paddle2See wrote:

#13 2011-03-16 09:45:09

Re: Comment Code

LS97 wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

#14 2011-03-16 10:20:58

Re: Comment Code

#15 2011-03-16 11:26:27

Re: Comment Code

LS97 wrote:

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

scimonster wrote:

#16 2011-03-16 11:27:40

Re: Comment Code

LS97 wrote:

#17 2011-03-16 14:00:46

Re: Comment Code

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

LS97 wrote:

#18 2011-03-16 14:07:02

Re: Comment Code

scimonster wrote:

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

LS97 wrote:

#19 2011-03-23 18:26:06

Re: Comment Code

scimonster wrote:

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

LS97 wrote:

#20 2011-03-23 19:32:38

Re: Comment Code

Paddle2See wrote:

#21 2011-03-23 19:50:49

Re: Comment Code

sparks wrote:

scimonster wrote:

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

Board footer