Scratch

jfmlove6 · 2010-12-30 15:00:34

I know this message may make me sound like a n00b because there are a bunch of topics about this, but I am active on the scratch website, I have 42 posts, and I don't see why I am still a new scratcher!

MiffinTheMuffin · 2010-12-30 15:05:43

Its not thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat weird. I have 100+ posts and I'm a new scratcher. I think you have to be super active to become a scratcher.

Wolfie1996 · 2010-12-30 15:06:46

In order to gain the Scratcher status, you have to be active over a period of time. You haven't been signed up on the forums for long enough to be a Scratcher just yet, but keep active, and your account status will soon change smile

MathLover12 · 2010-12-31 20:18:41

I'm still fairly new to Scratch, as well, and have not learned all of the "Scratching" ways. I love that the forums are open to all.

Amoriph · 2010-12-31 20:36:24

That answers my question too. smile

360 seconds between posts?! yikes

Don't you think that is a little harsh? Has it always been this way? If not, why was that rule added? hmm

kimmy123 · 2010-12-31 20:37:35

Amoriph wrote:
That answers my question too.

360 seconds between posts?!

Don't you think that is a little harsh? Has it always been this way? If not, why was that rule added?

It used to be 600 tongue

kingofdallamas · 2010-12-31 21:08:22

kimmy123 wrote:
Amoriph wrote:
That answers my question too.

360 seconds between posts?!

Don't you think that is a little harsh? Has it always been this way? If not, why was that rule added?
It used to be 600

Really? Mine just allows a sixty seconds interval to let me post again. tongue

Amoriph · 2010-12-31 21:51:14

kimmy123 wrote:
Amoriph wrote:
That answers my question too.

360 seconds between posts?!

Don't you think that is a little harsh? Has it always been this way? If not, why was that rule added?
It used to be 600

O_e

why?

kimmy123 · 2011-01-01 09:52:05

kingofdallamas wrote:
kimmy123 wrote:
Amoriph wrote:
That answers my question too.

360 seconds between posts?!

Don't you think that is a little harsh? Has it always been this way? If not, why was that rule added?
It used to be 600
Really? Mine just allows a sixty seconds interval to let me post again.

Because you are a Scratcher.

mathematics · 2011-01-01 10:36:32

kimmy123 wrote:
Amoriph wrote:
That answers my question too.

360 seconds between posts?!

Don't you think that is a little harsh? Has it always been this way? If not, why was that rule added?
It used to be 600

And before 600, it was 1000! tongue

Amoriph · 2011-01-01 12:23:37

mathematics wrote:
kimmy123 wrote:
Amoriph wrote:
That answers my question too.

360 seconds between posts?!

Don't you think that is a little harsh? Has it always been this way? If not, why was that rule added?
It used to be 600
And before 600, it was 1000!

Anyone care to tell me why? hmm

werdna123 · 2011-01-01 12:27:01

Amoriph wrote:
mathematics wrote:
kimmy123 wrote:

It used to be 600
And before 600, it was 1000!
Anyone care to tell me why?

To stop new scratchers spamming.

Amoriph · 2011-01-01 12:32:37

werdna123 wrote:
Amoriph wrote:
mathematics wrote:

And before 600, it was 1000!
Anyone care to tell me why?
To stop new scratchers spamming.

It doesn't look too serious now if you ask me. hmm

illusionist · 2011-01-01 12:36:12

Amoriph wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
Amoriph wrote:

Anyone care to tell me why?
To stop new scratchers spamming.
It doesn't look too serious now if you ask me.

I'll give it to you straight, because no one else will.

It was because of some troll attacks early in the year. (2010, not new year)

werdna123 · 2011-01-01 14:41:40

Amoriph wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
Amoriph wrote:

Anyone care to tell me why?
To stop new scratchers spamming.
It doesn't look too serious now if you ask me.

That's because we've got the rule. tongue

@Illusionist: What troll attack, what happened?

rufflebee · 2011-01-01 14:55:31

werdna123 wrote:
Amoriph wrote:
werdna123 wrote:

To stop new scratchers spamming.
It doesn't look too serious now if you ask me.
That's because we've got the rule.

@Illusionist: What troll attack, what happened?

Some kid posted a bunch of *
I know who that kid is but I won't name names lol

Well at least I think thats what happened
I'm not entirely sure, as I wasn't here

jimrockford · 2011-01-01 16:58:28

Wow, this is my first scratch, I have a looonf wat to go!

werdna123 · 2011-01-02 05:25:26

rufflebee wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
Amoriph wrote:

It doesn't look too serious now if you ask me.
That's because we've got the rule.

@Illusionist: What troll attack, what happened?
Some kid posted a bunch of *
I know who that kid is but I won't name names lol

Well at least I think thats what happened
I'm not entirely sure, as I wasn't here

I see...

Nexstudent · 2011-01-02 16:18:18

To answer all questions...

To be a new scratcher, you must be active over a period of time, not posts.
The 360 second rule is to prevent spam from those who do not fully understand the forum.

jfmlove6 · 2011-01-03 11:09:28

Nexstudent wrote:
To answer all questions...

To be a new scratcher, you must be active over a period of time, not posts.
The 360 second rule is to prevent spam from those who do not fully understand the forum.

I understand the fourms because I have been on many others. I saw why we had the 360 second rule before you posted.

TVflea · 2011-01-03 23:28:04

Amoriph wrote:
That answers my question too.

360 seconds between posts?!

Don't you think that is a little harsh? Has it always been this way? If not, why was that rule added?

no.i can post in less than six minutes watch

TVflea · 2011-01-03 23:41:41

see,told you.

militarydudes · 2011-01-03 23:54:06

jfmlove6 wrote:
.......I have 42 posts.....

:OOO

cheddargirl · 2011-01-04 00:43:00

TVflea wrote:
see,told you.

Actually, the time between your two posts show that they are over ten minutes apart. ^^;

jfmlove6 · 2011-01-04 17:00:14

I'm in CST, and according to me it has been 15 days but i can't make a sig!

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2010-12-30 15:00:34

im a new scratcher still.

#2 2010-12-30 15:05:43

Re: im a new scratcher still.

#3 2010-12-30 15:06:46

Re: im a new scratcher still.

#4 2010-12-31 20:18:41

Re: im a new scratcher still.

#5 2010-12-31 20:36:24

Re: im a new scratcher still.

#6 2010-12-31 20:37:35

Re: im a new scratcher still.

Amoriph wrote:

#7 2010-12-31 21:08:22

Re: im a new scratcher still.

kimmy123 wrote:

Amoriph wrote:

#8 2010-12-31 21:51:14

Re: im a new scratcher still.

kimmy123 wrote:

Amoriph wrote:

#9 2011-01-01 09:52:05

Re: im a new scratcher still.

kingofdallamas wrote:

kimmy123 wrote:

Amoriph wrote:

#10 2011-01-01 10:36:32

Re: im a new scratcher still.

kimmy123 wrote:

Amoriph wrote:

#11 2011-01-01 12:23:37

Re: im a new scratcher still.

mathematics wrote:

kimmy123 wrote:

Amoriph wrote:

#12 2011-01-01 12:27:01

Re: im a new scratcher still.

Amoriph wrote:

mathematics wrote:

kimmy123 wrote:

#13 2011-01-01 12:32:37

Re: im a new scratcher still.

werdna123 wrote:

Amoriph wrote:

mathematics wrote:

#14 2011-01-01 12:36:12

Re: im a new scratcher still.

Amoriph wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

Amoriph wrote:

#15 2011-01-01 14:41:40

Re: im a new scratcher still.

Amoriph wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

Amoriph wrote:

#16 2011-01-01 14:55:31

Re: im a new scratcher still.

werdna123 wrote:

Amoriph wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

#17 2011-01-01 16:58:28

Re: im a new scratcher still.

#18 2011-01-02 05:25:26

Re: im a new scratcher still.

rufflebee wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

Amoriph wrote:

#19 2011-01-02 16:18:18

Re: im a new scratcher still.

#20 2011-01-03 11:09:28

Re: im a new scratcher still.

Nexstudent wrote:

#21 2011-01-03 23:28:04

Re: im a new scratcher still.

Amoriph wrote:

#22 2011-01-03 23:41:41

Re: im a new scratcher still.

#23 2011-01-03 23:54:06