You just won the game.
Is there any other single paradox so powerful?
The game is a game that you cannot escape once you are informed. Basically, if you are reminded of the game, you lose, but you cannot lose more than once every 30 minutes. Now that you are informed, you are forever a slave to it
Last edited by steppenwulf (2010-11-27 21:25:53)
Offline
If you're not aware of the game, that is possible.
Offline
Thanks for pointing that out. I changed the original post.
Offline
Aidan wrote:
If you're not aware of the game, that is possible.
Actually, no. You cannot acknowledge that you won the game without also acknowledging that the game exists, so therefore you are thinking about the game, and you lose.
Offline
Actually it is not a paradox
Because I read it I read the game
You are saying I won the game but because you said the game I lost
Because it is impossible to win it is not a paradox
It is like saying Candlejack makes you-
Offline
GlitchSprite wrote:
Actually it is not a paradox
Because I read it I read the game
You are saying I won the game but because you said the game I lost
Because it is impossible to win it is not a paradox
It is like saying Candlejack makes you-
Did Candlejack click subm
Offline
ThePCKid wrote:
GlitchSprite wrote:
Actually it is not a paradox
Because I read it I read the game
You are saying I won the game but because you said the game I lost
Because it is impossible to win it is not a paradox
It is like saying Candlejack makes you-Did Candlejack click subm
it
Offline
GlitchSprite wrote:
Actually it is not a paradox
Because I read it I read the game
You are saying I won the game but because you said the game I lost
Because it is impossible to win it is not a paradox
It is like saying Candlejack makes you-
No, it is a paradox because it's saying you won the game, but by saying that you lose, but according to the sentence you won, but it says the game so you lose, etc.
Offline
webgal15 wrote:
GlitchSprite wrote:
Actually it is not a paradox
Because I read it I read the game
You are saying I won the game but because you said the game I lost
Because it is impossible to win it is not a paradox
It is like saying Candlejack makes you-No, it is a paradox because it's saying you won the game, but by saying that you lose, but according to the sentence you won, but it says the game so you lose, etc.
But because it is impossible to win the game that renders the second half of the paradox obsolete
Last edited by GlitchSprite (2010-11-27 21:51:53)
Offline
ThePCKid wrote:
GlitchSprite wrote:
Actually it is not a paradox
Because I read it I read the game
You are saying I won the game but because you said the game I lost
Because it is impossible to win it is not a paradox
It is like saying Candlejack makes you-Did Candlejack click subm
What's all this nonsense about Candlejack. It's not he's real or anyth-
Last edited by Aidan (2010-11-27 21:53:11)
Offline
kimmy123 wrote:
Are questions that are paradoxes called "paradox" or something else?
I think they're sophisms. Mostly because I spoken paradox can be canceled out by untruthfulness, where in a true paradox all given information is true and contradicts itself.
Last edited by Kileymeister (2010-11-27 21:56:07)
Offline
kimmy123 wrote:
Is this a paradox:
I am good at rhythm games, and I suck at rhythm games.
If both are true, yes. As I wrote above, the difference between spoken and true paradox is the capacity to lie.
Offline
Try this one: "This is a paradox"
Offline
Aidan wrote:
Try this one: "This is a paradox"
not really man watch this
if the statement is right then whoop de do
but if its false then its not a paradox and its lost its coolness
youve got a 50 percent chance of cool
i sound like a weather forecaster

Offline
TuffGhost wrote:
Aidan wrote:
Try this one: "This is a paradox"
not really man watch this
if the statement is right then whoop de do
but if its false then its not a paradox and its lost its coolness
youve got a 50 percent chance of cool
i sound like a weather forecaster
Erm, no. At first it is not a paradox. But then because the sentence says so, there is a contradiction. So it becomes a paradox. Okay, so now it's a paradox. But wait! Now the statement and the actual truth regarding the statement agree. So it's not a paradox. But then you're back at square one, and continue. A statement that infinitely contradicts itself. Same as "This statement is a lie."
Offline
here's a paradox:
Your mission is not to accept the mission. Do you accept?
Offline