juststickman wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Diagram wrote:
As in, blew your chance of him voting for you....why has he BLEW it?! I think younger mods are better. They know how to word things so younger people understand. What I mean is this:
Person1, age 10 : Why is this project not working for me?
Now, which is more useful?
FlexiStudio : You've forgotten to add a forever block. [image of a good script]
Some Older Person : Your project is lacking the basic requirement of a 'forever' block, meaning your creation is incapable of performing the commands after the flag is pressed.
I'm voting FlexiStudio. So THERE.![]()
"easier to understand younger user"
YAY exactly my point!
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Diagram wrote:
FlexiStudio wrote:
Blew it?
![]()
As in, blew your chance of him voting for you.
...why has he BLEW it?! I think younger mods are better. They know how to word things so younger people understand. What I mean is this:
Person1, age 10 : Why is this project not working for me?
Now, which is more useful?
FlexiStudio : You've forgotten to add a forever block. [image of a good script]
Some Older Person : Your project is lacking the basic requirement of a 'forever' block, meaning your creation is incapable of performing the commands after the flag is pressed.
I'm voting FlexiStudio. So THERE.![]()
We don't talk like that
Offline
steppenwulf wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Diagram wrote:
As in, blew your chance of him voting for you....why has he BLEW it?! I think younger mods are better. They know how to word things so younger people understand. What I mean is this:
Person1, age 10 : Why is this project not working for me?
Now, which is more useful?
FlexiStudio : You've forgotten to add a forever block. [image of a good script]
Some Older Person : Your project is lacking the basic requirement of a 'forever' block, meaning your creation is incapable of performing the commands after the flag is pressed.
I'm voting FlexiStudio. So THERE.![]()
We don't talk like that
![]()
You don't, steppen!!!
I mean OTHER Scratchers running. They might try to act older and more important, I mean.
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
juststickman wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
...why has he BLEW it?! I think younger mods are better. They know how to word things so younger people understand. What I mean is this:
Person1, age 10 : Why is this project not working for me?
Now, which is more useful?
FlexiStudio : You've forgotten to add a forever block. [image of a good script]
Some Older Person : Your project is lacking the basic requirement of a 'forever' block, meaning your creation is incapable of performing the commands after the flag is pressed.
I'm voting FlexiStudio. So THERE.![]()
"easier to understand younger user"
YAY exactly my point!
![]()
1. Who actually types like that on a kid's site?
I understood that perfectly. 2 years ago I would've too. That proves nothing.
2. What about a 13 year old mod, huh? (again, down with the 14 yr old rule, it's stupid IMO)
3. You just said younger mods are better. Vote against the 14 yr rule!
Offline
juststickman wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
juststickman wrote:
"easier to understand younger user"YAY exactly my point!
![]()
1. Who actually types like that on a kid's site?
I understood that perfectly. 2 years ago I would've too. That proves nothing.
2. What about a 13 year old mod, huh? (again, down with the 14 yr old rule, it's stupid IMO)
3. You just said younger mods are better. Vote against the 14 yr rule!
Someone might. You never know
And I don't agree with the rule either; there are plenty of mature under-14s. I'm just saying, I think Flexi would do a good job because he's mature and to the point. And his Scratch Informer mags are amazing. Really helpful stuff in there. If you read it, you'll see what I mean.
Offline
juststickman wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
juststickman wrote:
"easier to understand younger user"YAY exactly my point!
![]()
1. Who actually types like that on a kid's site?
I understood that perfectly. 2 years ago I would've too. That proves nothing.
2. What about a 13 year old mod, huh? (again, down with the 14 yr old rule, it's stupid IMO)
3. You just said younger mods are better. Vote against the 14 yr rule!
Dude, let it go. The Scratch Team's decision is final.
Besides, this topic should be discussing FlexiStudio's decision of running for mod.
Offline
Epik wrote:
juststickman wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
YAY exactly my point!![]()
1. Who actually types like that on a kid's site?
I understood that perfectly. 2 years ago I would've too. That proves nothing.
2. What about a 13 year old mod, huh? (again, down with the 14 yr old rule, it's stupid IMO)
3. You just said younger mods are better. Vote against the 14 yr rule!Dude, let it go. The Scratch Team's decision is final.
Besides, this topic should be discussing FlexiStudio's decision of running for mod.
I'm voting FlexiStudio. Who else?
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Epik wrote:
juststickman wrote:
1. Who actually types like that on a kid's site?
I understood that perfectly. 2 years ago I would've too. That proves nothing.
2. What about a 13 year old mod, huh? (again, down with the 14 yr old rule, it's stupid IMO)
3. You just said younger mods are better. Vote against the 14 yr rule!Dude, let it go. The Scratch Team's decision is final.
Besides, this topic should be discussing FlexiStudio's decision of running for mod.I'm voting FlexiStudio. Who else?
![]()
I definitely will - FlexiStudio is an integral part of the community who was contributed so much
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Epik wrote:
Dude, let it go. The Scratch Team's decision is final.
Besides, this topic should be discussing FlexiStudio's decision of running for mod.I'm voting FlexiStudio. Who else?
![]()
I definitely will - FlexiStudio is an integral part of the community who was contributed so much
![]()
I think that too. His informer news thread is really good. Have you seen it? It's really good for new AND experienced users!
Offline
Epik wrote:
juststickman wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
YAY exactly my point!![]()
1. Who actually types like that on a kid's site?
I understood that perfectly. 2 years ago I would've too. That proves nothing.
2. What about a 13 year old mod, huh? (again, down with the 14 yr old rule, it's stupid IMO)
3. You just said younger mods are better. Vote against the 14 yr rule!Dude, let it go. The Scratch Team's decision is final.
Besides, this topic should be discussing FlexiStudio's decision of running for mod.
If it becomes the #1 suggestion, it's probably gonna happen.
Offline
juststickman wrote:
Epik wrote:
juststickman wrote:
1. Who actually types like that on a kid's site?
I understood that perfectly. 2 years ago I would've too. That proves nothing.
2. What about a 13 year old mod, huh? (again, down with the 14 yr old rule, it's stupid IMO)
3. You just said younger mods are better. Vote against the 14 yr rule!Dude, let it go. The Scratch Team's decision is final.
Besides, this topic should be discussing FlexiStudio's decision of running for mod.If it becomes the #1 suggestion, it's probably gonna happen.
Not true - it's a definite final answer, at least for the time being. I can say with complete confidence that it won't be changing in the near future. I'm afraid this is one of those things that won't be changing just because people want it to; quite similar to the "be respectful" rule and the TOU.
Offline
JeanTheFox wrote:
Kileymeister wrote:
JeanTheFox wrote:
I'll consider. I dropped out though, so I won't be so focused on the campaigns.
![]()
You dropped out??
Not six months old. I'll try again next year.
Why so surprised?
Good luck next year, and I hope you consider my vote
Thanks for reading and @ juststickman, thanks for the explanation.
Offline
Thank you coolstuff for your kind comments, and yours to Dancing_Donut! I'm really glad you guys have my vote and are taking me seriously.
Anyway, Scratchers Inforumer #4 will be released when the news on the elections is, so stay tuned!
Offline
FlexiStudio wrote:
Thank you coolstuff for your kind comments, and yours to Dancing_Donut! I'm really glad you guys have my vote and are taking me seriously.
Anyway, Scratchers Inforumer #4 will be released when the news on the elections is, so stay tuned!
Why wouldn't we take you seriously?
Some of the other candidates are getting really pushy, but you seem like, um, you're pretty cool about the whole thing. That's a good thing, because mods can't really be easily stressed, or frustrated.
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
FlexiStudio wrote:
Thank you coolstuff for your kind comments, and yours to Dancing_Donut! I'm really glad you guys have my vote and are taking me seriously.
Anyway, Scratchers Inforumer #4 will be released when the news on the elections is, so stay tuned!
Why wouldn't we take you seriously?
![]()
Some of the other candidates are getting really pushy, but you seem like, um, you're pretty cool about the whole thing. That's a good thing, because mods can't really be easily stressed, or frustrated.![]()
I'm just taking it in my stride, and if I'm not chosen then, there's always the next elections to look forward too. Besides, it's an experience; and I'm out to help - and hopefully this will help me to achieve my goal.
Last edited by FlexiStudio (2010-10-14 14:35:01)
Offline
Very nice speech! I'm really glad so many people are interested in helping out the community. I've seen you around the forums, and you've always been a help to others. I'll definitely consider giving you my vote
Offline
FlexiStudio wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
FlexiStudio wrote:
Thank you coolstuff for your kind comments, and yours to Dancing_Donut! I'm really glad you guys have my vote and are taking me seriously.
Anyway, Scratchers Inforumer #4 will be released when the news on the elections is, so stay tuned!
Why wouldn't we take you seriously?
![]()
Some of the other candidates are getting really pushy, but you seem like, um, you're pretty cool about the whole thing. That's a good thing, because mods can't really be easily stressed, or frustrated.![]()
I'm just taking it in my stride, and if I'm not chosen then, there's always the next elections to look forward too. Besides, it's an experience; and I'm out to help - and hopefully this will help me to achieve my goal.
Yeah, the InForumer is boosting your chances too.
Best of luck anyways. I'm gonna upload my project now.
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
juststickman wrote:
Epik wrote:
Dude, let it go. The Scratch Team's decision is final.
Besides, this topic should be discussing FlexiStudio's decision of running for mod.If it becomes the #1 suggestion, it's probably gonna happen.
Not true - it's a definite final answer, at least for the time being. I can say with complete confidence that it won't be changing in the near future. I'm afraid this is one of those things that won't be changing just because people want it to; quite similar to the "be respectful" rule and the TOU.
TOU:
Be respectful. When sharing projects or posting comments, remember that people of many different ages and backgrounds will see your contributions.
Give one reason why not. Without this, there would be chaos. Without the 14 year limit, there would not be chaos.
Offer constructive comments. Instead of just criticizing a project or forum post, say what you like about it and offer suggestions on how to make it better.
Effectively the same as first one.
Give credit. Feel free to make modified versions of other people's projects - just make sure to give them credit. One place to give credit is in your Project Notes.
Copyrights...
Be honest. Don't pretend to be someone other than who you are or try to game the community.
Respectful argument.
Keep personal information private. Don't share your email address, phone number, or other personal contact information.
Legal thing if I remember correctly.
Help keep the site friendly. If you feel others would find a project or comment mean, insulting, too violent, or otherwise inappropriate, click the link that says "flag as inappropriate." In the Forums, you can do the same thing by clicking on the "Report" link below a post. The Scratch team will review, and may remove any project, comment or post.
Give one reason why not. Without this, there would be chaos. Without the 14 year limit, there would not be chaos.
Offline
juststickman wrote:
Give one reason why not. Without this, there would be chaos. Without the 14 year limit, there would not be chaos.
I can't imagine how adding such a rule would create chaos, as much as removing the rule would.
To state it again, The Scratch Team is not comfortable with those under 14 running for moderator. It is similar to how a parent doesn't want to expose their kids to certain things, even if the child does feels they are capable of handling such content.
The Scratch Team does think the age limit does have some cons in some ways, but, considering what moderators have to go through and the options available, the age limit was the best compromise they could come up with - they would rather have the age limit rather than have younger users handling the content that moderators have to handle at times (even if they, the younger users, appear to be mature enough to handle it).
Lastly, this argument is spilling over where it should not be - this is FlexiStudios' campaign thread. Please move this conversation over to the appropriate thread on the Announcements forum.

Offline
It is similar to how a parent doesn't want to expose their kids to certain things, even if the child does feels they are capable of handling such content.
Brilliant reason. I couldn't put it any better myself. Anyway, shall we get back on-topic? Thanks for all the response guys!
Offline
Best of luck, fellow runner
Offline
steppenwulf wrote:
Best of luck, fellow runner
![]()
You too
Offline