This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2010-10-13 11:30:58

ob6160
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-10-10
Posts: 500+

A more advanced Painter

I think scratch could to with a better paint program. With pre-made shapes. Also it could do with an integrated .exe compiler.

OB6160


http://i45.tinypic.com/2jcygsy.gif

Offline

 

#2 2010-10-13 11:37:41

FlexiStudio
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-28
Posts: 1000+

Re: A more advanced Painter

ob6160 wrote:

I think scratch could to with a better paint program. With pre-made shapes. Also it could do with an integrated .exe compiler.

OB6160

Maybe not a separate .exe compiler, but the text option is pretty bad. Maybe they should try and mimic some of the effects on Photoshop and GIMP. The PE is one of things that lets it down  sad


Hey I'm back!-
FlexiStudio

Offline

 

#3 2010-10-13 12:06:26

mathematics
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-03-01
Posts: 1000+

Re: A more advanced Painter

What do you mean "with pre-made shapes"?

Offline

 

#4 2010-10-13 12:42:12

ob6160
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-10-10
Posts: 500+

Re: A more advanced Painter

Like Stars or Speech bubbles which you can drag onto the designer.

OB6160

____________________________

See my blog at: oliverspcpages.blogspot.com
See my pojects at: http://scratch.mit.edu/users/ob6160


http://i45.tinypic.com/2jcygsy.gif

Offline

 

#5 2010-10-13 13:48:13

cheddargirl
Scratch Team
Registered: 2008-09-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: A more advanced Painter

FlexiStudio wrote:

ob6160 wrote:

I think scratch could to with a better paint program. With pre-made shapes. Also it could do with an integrated .exe compiler.

OB6160

Maybe not a separate .exe compiler, but the text option is pretty bad. Maybe they should try and mimic some of the effects on Photoshop and GIMP. The PE is one of things that lets it down  sad

Agreed, the text option is kind of pretty bad (especially considering the invisible text bug that is been going around) - it would be nice of all the text wasn't on one separate layer and it could be embedded right there into the image.

I don't think we really need the have too much of the same effects as with Photoshop and GIMP, though - anyone who uses Photoshop and GIMP knows that those programs are usually memory hogs, I'm a bit concerned that adding similar Photoshop and GIMP effects in Scratch will bog Scratch down, which we don't want.


http://i.imgur.com/8QRYx.png
Everything is better when you add a little cheddar, because when you have cheese your life is at ease  smile

Offline

 

#6 2010-10-13 14:25:40

FlexiStudio
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-28
Posts: 1000+

Re: A more advanced Painter

cheddargirl wrote:

FlexiStudio wrote:

ob6160 wrote:

I think scratch could to with a better paint program. With pre-made shapes. Also it could do with an integrated .exe compiler.

OB6160

Maybe not a separate .exe compiler, but the text option is pretty bad. Maybe they should try and mimic some of the effects on Photoshop and GIMP. The PE is one of things that lets it down  sad

Agreed, the text option is kind of pretty bad (especially considering the invisible text bug that is been going around) - it would be nice of all the text wasn't on one separate layer and it could be embedded right there into the image.

I don't think we really need the have too much of the same effects as with Photoshop and GIMP, though - anyone who uses Photoshop and GIMP knows that those programs are usually memory hogs, I'm a bit concerned that adding similar Photoshop and GIMP effects in Scratch will bog Scratch down, which we don't want.

I suppose it could get a bit bogged, but maybe just one simple effect like 'Blur' or 'Shine' or something small. That wouldn't slow it down too much. Maybe they should also add a 'text box' tool, so on one sprite you can have different fonts and font sizes.


Hey I'm back!-
FlexiStudio

Offline

 

#7 2010-10-13 14:51:15

cheddargirl
Scratch Team
Registered: 2008-09-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: A more advanced Painter

FlexiStudio wrote:

cheddargirl wrote:

FlexiStudio wrote:


Maybe not a separate .exe compiler, but the text option is pretty bad. Maybe they should try and mimic some of the effects on Photoshop and GIMP. The PE is one of things that lets it down  sad

Agreed, the text option is kind of pretty bad (especially considering the invisible text bug that is been going around) - it would be nice of all the text wasn't on one separate layer and it could be embedded right there into the image.

I don't think we really need the have too much of the same effects as with Photoshop and GIMP, though - anyone who uses Photoshop and GIMP knows that those programs are usually memory hogs, I'm a bit concerned that adding similar Photoshop and GIMP effects in Scratch will bog Scratch down, which we don't want.

I suppose it could get a bit bogged, but maybe just one simple effect like 'Blur' or 'Shine' or something small. That wouldn't slow it down too much. Maybe they should also add a 'text box' tool, so on one sprite you can have different fonts and font sizes.

Mnn, I think, for that, the color detection should be improved first (Scratch can't tell the differences between certain shades of color).

I think the better option would be to use some kind of integration between Scratch and the image editor of a person's choosing - ie. instead of the default paint editor, clicking on the option to create a new image would open up the computer's default image editor, and, when done, would import the image into Scratch. At least that way there isn't the issue of a top-heavy paint editor bogging Scratch down.


http://i.imgur.com/8QRYx.png
Everything is better when you add a little cheddar, because when you have cheese your life is at ease  smile

Offline

 

Board footer