Actually, that was a minor concern. Before this rule was implemented, I was already wondering about the Shocksites(look it up). Although I'm kind off >_< over the rule, at least I don't have to worry about the Sites for 3 more years!
O
Oh, and S65, maturity has NO PART IN THE DECISION. Read this quote:
cheddargirl wrote:
The Scratch Team is aware that there are mature users under the age of 14. What they are not comfortable with is those under the age of 14 being exposed to some of the issues that moderators have to deal with, regardless on whether or not the underage user feels that he/she could handle them (please see the thread in announcements for more info).
Offline
helltank wrote:
Oh, and S65, maturity has NO PART IN THE DECISION. Read this quote:
cheddargirl wrote:
The Scratch Team is aware that there are mature users under the age of 14. What they are not comfortable with is those under the age of 14 being exposed to some of the issues that moderators have to deal with, regardless on whether or not the underage user feels that he/she could handle them (please see the thread in announcements for more info).
What people say and what they're really thinking, or maybe in this case what their bosses are really thinking, can be two very different things
Offline
S65 wrote:
helltank wrote:
Oh, and S65, maturity has NO PART IN THE DECISION. Read this quote:
cheddargirl wrote:
The Scratch Team is aware that there are mature users under the age of 14. What they are not comfortable with is those under the age of 14 being exposed to some of the issues that moderators have to deal with, regardless on whether or not the underage user feels that he/she could handle them (please see the thread in announcements for more info).
What people say and what they're really thinking, or maybe in this case what their bosses are really thinking, can be two very different things
So... the Scratch Team lied to cheddargirl, who then reported inaccurate information? I don't think so.
Offline