This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#126 2010-10-01 19:08:04

recycle49
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?

kimmy123 wrote:

Chrischb wrote:

scratch_yoshi wrote:


This.

This.

This.

This.


"Every challenge must be met, every battle must be won, and every story will end." -Me
Recycle49 December 09 - November 11 Goodbye

Offline

 

#127 2010-10-01 19:08:06

helltank
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?

Actually, that was a minor concern. Before this rule was implemented, I was already wondering about the Shocksites(look it up). Although I'm kind off >_< over the rule, at least I don't have to worry about the Sites for 3 more years!  big_smile  O

Oh, and S65, maturity has NO PART IN THE DECISION. Read this quote:

cheddargirl wrote:

The Scratch Team is aware that there are mature users under the age of 14. What they are not comfortable with is those under the age of 14 being exposed to some of the issues that moderators have to deal with, regardless on whether or not the underage user feels that he/she could handle them (please see the thread in announcements for more info).


Error:Signature could not load. Please wait for an indefinite amount of time, until you realize you're gullible and go off to look for another potentially interesting signature to stare at.

Offline

 

#128 2010-10-01 19:08:43

Blade-Edge
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?

Just quote kimmy if you want to keep spamming that chain


http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5145/scratchycat.gif CLASSY

Offline

 

#129 2010-10-01 19:10:47

S65
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-05-18
Posts: 100+

Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?

helltank wrote:

Oh, and S65, maturity has NO PART IN THE DECISION. Read this quote:

cheddargirl wrote:

The Scratch Team is aware that there are mature users under the age of 14. What they are not comfortable with is those under the age of 14 being exposed to some of the issues that moderators have to deal with, regardless on whether or not the underage user feels that he/she could handle them (please see the thread in announcements for more info).

What people say and what they're really thinking, or maybe in this case what their bosses are really thinking, can be two very different things

Offline

 

#130 2010-10-01 19:14:59

helltank
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?

S65 wrote:

helltank wrote:

Oh, and S65, maturity has NO PART IN THE DECISION. Read this quote:

cheddargirl wrote:

The Scratch Team is aware that there are mature users under the age of 14. What they are not comfortable with is those under the age of 14 being exposed to some of the issues that moderators have to deal with, regardless on whether or not the underage user feels that he/she could handle them (please see the thread in announcements for more info).

What people say and what they're really thinking, or maybe in this case what their bosses are really thinking, can be two very different things

So... the Scratch Team lied to cheddargirl, who then reported inaccurate information? I don't think so.


Error:Signature could not load. Please wait for an indefinite amount of time, until you realize you're gullible and go off to look for another potentially interesting signature to stare at.

Offline

 

Board footer