I responded to 08jackt's comment on his project "stop tah spam people" saying "Don't be mean. I like 08jackt's project, and you're being really mean to him! This project isn't spam!" I thought it was obvious that I was kidding, but apparently, it wasn't, and now I'm being used as the next epic fail in Scratcher's Weekly.
Should I just stop joking like this altogether? I enjoy acting ignorant...
Last edited by Sunrise-Moon (2010-09-07 13:05:11)
Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
I responded to 08jackt's comment on his project "stop tah spam people" saying "Don't be mean. I like 08jackt's project, and you're being really mean to him! This project isn't spam!" I thought it was obvious that I was kidding, but apparently, it wasn't, and now I'm being used as the next epic fail in Scratcher's Weekly.
Should I just stop joking like this altogether? I enjoy acting ignorant...
Joke, but dont take it to extreme heights
Offline
Ah, I've seen cases like this before. You must remember that, on the internet, comments can often not be perceived as intended, so it is important to think about what is being posted before the post if officially submitted.
Should I just stop joking like this altogether? I enjoy acting ignorant...
There are cases where things should be ignored; this is one of those cases where showing ignorance to the situation is not good. Your comment was perceived as being hurtful; I would suggest thinking about what was said, and, in the future, watch what you type and submit.

Offline
cheddargirl wrote:
Ah, I've seen cases like this before. You must remember that, on the internet, comments can often not be perceived as intended, so it is important to think about what is being posted before the post if officially submitted.
Should I just stop joking like this altogether? I enjoy acting ignorant...
There are cases where things should be ignored; this is one of those cases where showing ignorance to the situation is not good. Your comment was perceived as being hurtful; I would suggest thinking about what was said, and, in the future, watch what you type and submit.
It wasn't quite perceived as being hurtful, but rather they thought I didn't realize I was talking to 08jackt xD.
Regardless, this is true. I should think more before I joke around on the internet.
Last edited by Sunrise-Moon (2010-09-07 13:23:29)
Offline
What project was it?
Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
cheddargirl wrote:
Ah, I've seen cases like this before. You must remember that, on the internet, comments can often not be perceived as intended, so it is important to think about what is being posted before the post if officially submitted.
Should I just stop joking like this altogether? I enjoy acting ignorant...
There are cases where things should be ignored; this is one of those cases where showing ignorance to the situation is not good. Your comment was perceived as being hurtful; I would suggest thinking about what was said, and, in the future, watch what you type and submit.
It wasn't quite perceived as being hurtful, but rather they thought I didn't realize I was talking to 08jackt xD.
Regardless, this is true. I should think more before I joke around on the internet.
Well, as stated before, jokes often don't come off the way as intended on the internet (hence why others perceived your comment as an attack rather than as a joke). So it's still best to be careful to watch what is being written.

Offline
Aidan wrote:
What project was it?
![]()
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/08jackt/1276627
Last edited by Sunrise-Moon (2010-09-07 13:28:29)
Offline
Hey cheddargirl in Scratchers Weekly there is an epic fail section where the user shows off a "fail" comment made by a random user. Obviously not everyone thinks it's funny, so wouldn't that be against the TOU?
Offline
steppenwulf wrote:
Hey cheddargirl in Scratchers Weekly there is an epic fail section where the user shows off a "fail" comment made by a random user. Obviously not everyone thinks it's funny, so wouldn't that be against the TOU?
I would say that it's against "Be Friendly" and "Be Respectful". If a new user is commenting and they "don't know their way around Scratch", then they might be really discouraged to find that they "did something wrong" and ended up on the epic fail.
Offline
steppenwulf wrote:
Hey cheddargirl in Scratchers Weekly there is an epic fail section where the user shows off a "fail" comment made by a random user. Obviously not everyone thinks it's funny, so wouldn't that be against the TOU?
It most likely might be (I haven't seen what this "fail" comment is, so it's hard to say here). The Terms of Use calls for users to be respectful and keep the site friendly, so if the "fail" comment is used to make fun of another user, then it's possible that it would be perceived as breaking the Term of Use.

Offline
cheddargirl wrote:
steppenwulf wrote:
Hey cheddargirl in Scratchers Weekly there is an epic fail section where the user shows off a "fail" comment made by a random user. Obviously not everyone thinks it's funny, so wouldn't that be against the TOU?
It most likely might be (I haven't seen what this "fail" comment is, so it's hard to say here). The Terms of Use calls for users to be respectful and keep the site friendly, so if the "fail" comment is used to make fun of another user, then it's possible that it would be perceived as breaking the Term of Use.
It is used to make fun of other users. In the last issue, he just found a random project, posted a link to it, and told everyone to spam "speghetti pickle" on it. The project got front page, but it had over 400 "speghetti pickle" comments.
Offline
ask yourself this, is ignorance bliss?

Offline
Nexstudent wrote:
ask yourself this, is ignorance bliss?
xD.
steppenwulf wrote:
cheddargirl wrote:
steppenwulf wrote:
Hey cheddargirl in Scratchers Weekly there is an epic fail section where the user shows off a "fail" comment made by a random user. Obviously not everyone thinks it's funny, so wouldn't that be against the TOU?
It most likely might be (I haven't seen what this "fail" comment is, so it's hard to say here). The Terms of Use calls for users to be respectful and keep the site friendly, so if the "fail" comment is used to make fun of another user, then it's possible that it would be perceived as breaking the Term of Use.
It is used to make fun of other users. In the last issue, he just found a random project, posted a link to it, and told everyone to spam "speghetti pickle" on it. The project got front page, but it had over 400 "speghetti pickle" comments.
Yeah, that would be really annoying if you were trying to look for a few serious comments. I can see why the kid was mad about the spaghetti pickle comments.
Last edited by Sunrise-Moon (2010-09-07 13:43:19)
Offline
steppenwulf wrote:
cheddargirl wrote:
steppenwulf wrote:
Hey cheddargirl in Scratchers Weekly there is an epic fail section where the user shows off a "fail" comment made by a random user. Obviously not everyone thinks it's funny, so wouldn't that be against the TOU?
It most likely might be (I haven't seen what this "fail" comment is, so it's hard to say here). The Terms of Use calls for users to be respectful and keep the site friendly, so if the "fail" comment is used to make fun of another user, then it's possible that it would be perceived as breaking the Term of Use.
It is used to make fun of other users. In the last issue, he just found a random project, posted a link to it, and told everyone to spam "speghetti pickle" on it. The project got front page, but it had over 400 "speghetti pickle" comments.
Then yes, it would be against the TOU.

Offline
steppenwulf wrote:
cheddargirl wrote:
steppenwulf wrote:
Hey cheddargirl in Scratchers Weekly there is an epic fail section where the user shows off a "fail" comment made by a random user. Obviously not everyone thinks it's funny, so wouldn't that be against the TOU?
It most likely might be (I haven't seen what this "fail" comment is, so it's hard to say here). The Terms of Use calls for users to be respectful and keep the site friendly, so if the "fail" comment is used to make fun of another user, then it's possible that it would be perceived as breaking the Term of Use.
It is used to make fun of other users. In the last issue, he just found a random project, posted a link to it, and told everyone to spam "speghetti pickle" on it. The project got front page, but it had over 400 "speghetti pickle" comments.
Who told everyone to spam 'speghetti pickle'?
08jackt?
Offline
FlexiStudio wrote:
steppenwulf wrote:
cheddargirl wrote:
It most likely might be (I haven't seen what this "fail" comment is, so it's hard to say here). The Terms of Use calls for users to be respectful and keep the site friendly, so if the "fail" comment is used to make fun of another user, then it's possible that it would be perceived as breaking the Term of Use.It is used to make fun of other users. In the last issue, he just found a random project, posted a link to it, and told everyone to spam "speghetti pickle" on it. The project got front page, but it had over 400 "speghetti pickle" comments.
Who told everyone to spam 'speghetti pickle'?
08jackt?
No, but we can't say who because it'd be 'gossip' in a way.
Offline
Yeah I know what you mean. I was surprised and wanted to geth things straight. 08jackt wouldnt do that
Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
I responded to 08jackt's comment on his project "stop tah spam people" saying "Don't be mean. I like 08jackt's project, and you're being really mean to him! This project isn't spam!" I thought it was obvious that I was kidding, but apparently, it wasn't, and now I'm being used as the next epic fail in Scratcher's Weekly.
Should I just stop joking like this altogether? I enjoy acting ignorant...
Ahaha
Keep joking like that, I love misunderstandings
Offline