A project being "inappropriate" is a sticky subject. However, a good rule of thumb is this: Would one of your parents be worried or offended if they saw what you were posting to the Scratch website? If in doubt, it's better just not to post. There are so many outlets for gratuitous violence and * on the Internet. Also, consider whether the project uses copyrighted material, as this might give the Scratch team grounds to remove it.
However, I have looked through your page and you don't seem like the kind of user whose projects fall under any of these. Try using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of the page to explain your situation to the Scratch team!
Offline
mjd wrote:
one of my projects flaged end i need to no y!! its this one: http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/mjd/1059806 plz some one help me!!!
Hi mjd - On this project, the song was considered inappropriate for an all-ages site. It has a incompletely "bleeped" swear word and also discuses adult situations. Remember that you can always use the Contact Us form or email to help@scratch.mit.edu if you want clarification from the Scratch Team on something. Scratch on!
Offline
LinkGuy wrote:
Is that the Hester Shaw pic? [removed by Forum Moderator]??? Why would it get flagged by the scratch team???? How was it innapropriate?
I'm sorry but you've confused me. I said above that the reason the project was censored was because of the song.
Offline
Paddle2see can you tell me why it said par of my sentence was removed? Didn't I say what the heck or *?
Offline
Composer wrote:
LinkGuy wrote:
Paddle2see can you tell me why it said par of my sentence was removed? Didn't I say what the heck or *?
Still—It's implying a swear.
How is fudge a swear? It's better than actually saying the real thing. That's how I try and avoid saying curses by replacing them with better words, in this case, I replaced it with fudge.
Offline
LinkGuy wrote:
Composer wrote:
LinkGuy wrote:
Paddle2see can you tell me why it said par of my sentence was removed? Didn't I say what the heck or *?
Still—It's implying a swear.
How is fudge a swear? It's better than actually saying the real thing. That's how I try and avoid saying curses by replacing them with better words, in this case, I replaced it with fudge.
But you're still implying a swear word.
Offline
LinkGuy wrote:
Composer wrote:
LinkGuy wrote:
Paddle2see can you tell me why it said par of my sentence was removed? Didn't I say what the heck or *?
Still—It's implying a swear.
How is fudge a swear? It's better than actually saying the real thing. That's how I try and avoid saying curses by replacing them with better words, in this case, I replaced it with fudge.
It's a great idea to replace swear words! You're on the right track. However, "fudge", while it may refer to chocolate, is a very close representation of the swear word that everyone knows about.
My personal favorite substitutes(They change often):
Fringadooe
Loppola
Hekank
You can be creative about your substitutes!
EDIT: Coolstuff is right though, it still implies a swear word. But such offset substitutes should do the trick. At least I think.
Last edited by Greatdane (2010-06-13 13:00:58)
Offline
StarCobra wrote:
i think you should use fudgenuggets because fudgenuggets is longer than the actual word
Good point.
Offline