Scratch

u know what, im deleting the q method and becoming a supporter of this XD

I do this (I program for funs) but my projects end up like Greatdane's method signifies.

illusionist wrote:

If this wasn't what we've been doing for 2 years, I would agree.

But that is not the case. 

Right now this isn't what you're doing. Instead, you're acting idiotically by attempting to mass-produce games just to get on the front page. Pathetic, one might say. Pitiful. Moving and emotional. It makes one's heart feel sorrow and only sorrow.

illusionist wrote:

Fail.

Paddle2See wrote:

There are a lot of benefits to making simple games.  They are easy to learn and usually run well in Scratch - even online.  They are quicker to make.  I think it is a very good decision to make many small, games that run well rather than large ones that tend to lag.

If you still haven't figured it out:

Simplicity comes with education, runspeed (less lag), and production speed.

More production speed increases product, and product of product, or education.

To put it even simpler, simulations will make a comeback as well as games.


And Scratch will benefit even more.

Ownage Pwnage. 

Goodnight friend. 

Excuse me, I love my simple games. But you're missing the point entirely: You're still mass-producing games for the sake of a few more games on the front page. You're releasing them in a rush. You have no time to think about what you're making. You're like a robot. It's like playing a piano piece without emotion. You're producing sound, but there's nothing special about it.

cocoanut wrote:

illusionist wrote:

Fail.

Paddle2See wrote:

There are a lot of benefits to making simple games.  They are easy to learn and usually run well in Scratch - even online.  They are quicker to make.  I think it is a very good decision to make many small, games that run well rather than large ones that tend to lag.

If you still haven't figured it out:

Simplicity comes with education, runspeed (less lag), and production speed.

More production speed increases product, and product of product, or education.

To put it even simpler, simulations will make a comeback as well as games.


And Scratch will benefit even more.

Ownage Pwnage. 

Goodnight friend. 

Excuse me, I love my simple games. But you're missing the point entirely: You're still mass-producing games for the sake of a few more games on the front page. You're releasing them in a rush. You have no time to think about what you're making. You're like a robot. It's like playing a piano piece without emotion. You're producing sound, but there's nothing special about it.

Yeah, I feel the same way. To make things just to get attention on a kids site, I think there should be more too it. Clearly scratch is good with simple games, but should you spend you time making a cookie product that you already know how to make? Wouldn't your time be better spent making something new and trying new things?

RHY3756547 wrote:

cocoanut wrote:

Step 1: Make a game and have fun with it.

The end! Go ahead and enjoy your life!

I just made a game by doing this mr cocoanut sir!

Do I get a cookie?

Complete with M&Ms, Rhys.

...and peppermint fudge.

cocoanut wrote:

...and peppermint fudge.

http://www.beckyhiggins.com/blog/upload … 759491.jpg

And support for this method.

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/soupoftomato/983070

That's right, I had fun making this game and it's officially swtiching to The Proper Method.