This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#76 2010-01-30 13:24:49

ScratchX
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-05
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not  lol 
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just Kidding  tongue  It fun to see what you guys think about 9/11


Happy New Year!
http://i45.tinypic.com/1nyasi.pnghttp://i50.tinypic.com/219pez8.pnghttp://i49.tinypic.com/e5s4zr.pnghttp://i48.tinypic.com/23l18hf.jpghttp://i49.tinypic.com/66zymu.png

Offline

 

#77 2010-01-30 13:27:08

littletonkslover
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-12-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

funkymonkey wrote:

it rained a couple days ago... what is the big thing about that?

In winter, it's suppossed to SNOW in Minnesota, gar!

lol......gar.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/Lepisosteus_oculatus.jpg

Last edited by littletonkslover (2010-01-30 13:28:50)


http://www.coxlab.org/images/rat_banner.jpg
That's the dark nature of capitalism. ~ Wonder Showzen

Offline

 

#78 2010-01-30 13:29:44

filo5
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

ScratchX wrote:

12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not  lol 
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just Kidding  tongue  It fun to see what you guys think about 9/11

Actually, I'm 14


Converting my Scratch projects to Python!

Offline

 

#79 2010-01-30 13:37:09

funkymonkey
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-06-03
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

filo5 wrote:

ScratchX wrote:

12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not  lol 
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just Kidding  tongue  It fun to see what you guys think about 9/11

Actually, I'm 14

lol yeah i can assure you I am not 12. but i'm pretty sure adriangl is, or he's 9 or something? i can't remember


http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/ff67/hprules_photos/banner2.jpg
Kuzimu: Dawn of a New Age                                                                                                  Coming May 2010

Offline

 

#80 2010-01-30 13:42:56

littletonkslover
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-12-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

funkymonkey wrote:

filo5 wrote:

ScratchX wrote:

12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not  lol 
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just Kidding  tongue  It fun to see what you guys think about 9/11

Actually, I'm 14

lol yeah i can assure you I am not 12. but i'm pretty sure adriangl is, or he's 9 or something? i can't remember

I'm 11.


http://www.coxlab.org/images/rat_banner.jpg
That's the dark nature of capitalism. ~ Wonder Showzen

Offline

 

#81 2010-01-30 13:51:32

RHY3756547
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-08-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

filo5 wrote:

ScratchX wrote:

12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not  lol 
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just Kidding  tongue  It fun to see what you guys think about 9/11

Actually, I'm 14

I find that hard to believe because of your behaviour on wave.  tongue

lol - kidding.

Offline

 

#82 2010-01-30 13:55:52

adriangl
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

funkymonkey wrote:

filo5 wrote:

ScratchX wrote:

12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not  lol 
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just Kidding  tongue  It fun to see what you guys think about 9/11

Actually, I'm 14

lol yeah i can assure you I am not 12. but i'm pretty sure adriangl is, or he's 9 or something? i can't remember

11, not 12, I am just mature for my age  big_smile

Now let's get back on topic, enough on "global warming"


Scratchin' since 2007

Offline

 

#83 2010-01-30 14:01:30

filo5
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

Ok... who likes bananas in chocolate?


Converting my Scratch projects to Python!

Offline

 

#84 2010-01-30 14:10:01

ScratchX
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-05
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

filo5 wrote:

Ok... who likes bananas in chocolate?

Back on topic  tongue


Happy New Year!
http://i45.tinypic.com/1nyasi.pnghttp://i50.tinypic.com/219pez8.pnghttp://i49.tinypic.com/e5s4zr.pnghttp://i48.tinypic.com/23l18hf.jpghttp://i49.tinypic.com/66zymu.png

Offline

 

#85 2010-01-30 14:13:41

adriangl
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

Just watched another video. This one from 500 yards away taken from inside an apartment. Shows a whole new view. There is no way two planes hitting where the fire was could have made the building collapse, There was definitely a bomb somewhere inside.


Scratchin' since 2007

Offline

 

#86 2010-01-30 14:14:20

ScratchX
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-05
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

adriangl wrote:

Just watched another video. This one from 500 yards away taken from inside an apartment. Shows a whole new view. There is no way two planes hitting where the fire was could have made the building collapse, There was definitely a bomb somewhere inside.

There could have been bombs IN the airplanes ehh?  tongue


Happy New Year!
http://i45.tinypic.com/1nyasi.pnghttp://i50.tinypic.com/219pez8.pnghttp://i49.tinypic.com/e5s4zr.pnghttp://i48.tinypic.com/23l18hf.jpghttp://i49.tinypic.com/66zymu.png

Offline

 

#87 2010-01-30 14:18:40

adriangl
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

ScratchX wrote:

adriangl wrote:

Just watched another video. This one from 500 yards away taken from inside an apartment. Shows a whole new view. There is no way two planes hitting where the fire was could have made the building collapse, There was definitely a bomb somewhere inside.

There could have been bombs IN the airplanes ehh?  tongue

That went down all the stairs to the first floor, and then blew up. Very realistic  smile


Scratchin' since 2007

Offline

 

#88 2010-01-30 14:19:47

ScratchX
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-05
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

adriangl wrote:

ScratchX wrote:

adriangl wrote:

Just watched another video. This one from 500 yards away taken from inside an apartment. Shows a whole new view. There is no way two planes hitting where the fire was could have made the building collapse, There was definitely a bomb somewhere inside.

There could have been bombs IN the airplanes ehh?  tongue

That went down all the stairs to the first floor, and then blew up. Very realistic  smile

The bomb being IN the plane or IN the building?


Happy New Year!
http://i45.tinypic.com/1nyasi.pnghttp://i50.tinypic.com/219pez8.pnghttp://i49.tinypic.com/e5s4zr.pnghttp://i48.tinypic.com/23l18hf.jpghttp://i49.tinypic.com/66zymu.png

Offline

 

#89 2010-01-30 14:23:45

adriangl
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

ScratchX wrote:

adriangl wrote:

ScratchX wrote:


There could have been bombs IN the airplanes ehh?  tongue

That went down all the stairs to the first floor, and then blew up. Very realistic  smile

The bomb being IN the plane or IN the building?

What? Okay, let me explain again. For the building to collapse like it did, there would have to be bombs on the first few floors. Even a bomb in the plane would just explode where the plane was, which is the top of the building, thus, not resulting in the building collapsing.


Scratchin' since 2007

Offline

 

#90 2010-01-30 14:25:02

BWOG
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-09-19
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

First of all, only 2 planes hit the WTC towers. There were 4 planes hijacked, but only 3 of them hit any buildings. Also, I don't believe that there were any bombs because the government would not do something like that. If there were any bombs, they were placed before the airplane hit the building. And a plane smashing into a building would damage it enough that it would possibly make the building collapse.

Offline

 

#91 2010-01-30 14:29:11

adriangl
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

BWOG wrote:

First of all, only 2 planes hit the WTC towers. There were 4 planes hijacked, but only 3 of them hit any buildings. Also, I don't believe that there were any bombs because the government would not do something like that. If there were any bombs, they were placed before the airplane hit the building. And a plane smashing into a building would damage it enough that it would possibly make the building collapse.

How do you know 4 were hijacked? They only found 3 planes. More lies from the government. And 1 plane hitting the second tower makes it collapse when it took two planes for the first tower? Bombs, lies, cover-ups.


Scratchin' since 2007

Offline

 

#92 2010-01-30 14:31:47

filo5
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

No, the third plane *cough cough* hit *cough cough* Pentagon, and the fourth one crashed on a field. Actually, it was just some metal junk scattered around. No real plane parts. How does that feel?


Converting my Scratch projects to Python!

Offline

 

#93 2010-01-30 14:33:18

adriangl
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

filo5 wrote:

No, the third plane *cough cough* hit *cough cough* Pentagon, and the fourth one crashed on a field. Actually, it was just some metal junk scattered around. No real plane parts. How does that feel?

Umm, then why did they never find plane parts in the Pentagon.http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/ … re=related There, proof that there was no plane, but an explosion. Good enough?


Scratchin' since 2007

Offline

 

#94 2010-01-30 14:34:12

BWOG
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-09-19
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

filo5 wrote:

No, the third plane *cough cough* hit *cough cough* Pentagon, and the fourth one crashed on a field. Actually, it was just some metal junk scattered around. No real plane parts. How does that feel?

You're right. American Airlines flight 11 and United Airlines flight 175 both hit the WTC towers. AA flight 77 hit the Pentagon, and UA flight 93 crashed in Pennslvania.

Offline

 

#95 2010-01-30 14:34:38

filo5
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

@adriangl that's why *cough cough*. You think I didn't know that? I watched loose change-final cut. I know what d'you mean.

Last edited by filo5 (2010-01-30 14:36:01)


Converting my Scratch projects to Python!

Offline

 

#96 2010-01-30 14:35:49

BWOG
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-09-19
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

adriangl wrote:

filo5 wrote:

No, the third plane *cough cough* hit *cough cough* Pentagon, and the fourth one crashed on a field. Actually, it was just some metal junk scattered around. No real plane parts. How does that feel?

Umm, then why did they never find plane parts in the Pentagon.http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/ … re=related There, proof that there was no plane, but an explosion. Good enough?

Then how about this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/757_pentagon.gif
Now do you see the plane? And the plane isn't trees, as it's gone in the second frame.

Last edited by BWOG (2010-01-30 14:36:27)

Offline

 

#97 2010-01-30 14:37:50

filo5
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

I know what you mean. Why would the plane leave exhaust trail? normally, they're visible only on high heights.


Converting my Scratch projects to Python!

Offline

 

#98 2010-01-30 14:38:52

BWOG
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-09-19
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

filo5 wrote:

I know what you mean. Why would the plane leave exhaust trail? normally, they're visible only on high heights.

If the plane hit the ground, it would of probably hit the fuselage, which would make it catch on fire.

Offline

 

#99 2010-01-30 14:41:07

filo5
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

so? still, the smoke would be black. And this one's whiteish-grey. you know what leaves trails like that? missiles.


Converting my Scratch projects to Python!

Offline

 

#100 2010-01-30 14:42:00

BWOG
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-09-19
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread

filo5 wrote:

so? still, the smoke would be black. And this one's whiteish-grey. you know what leaves trails like that? missiles.

And how would a missile be that low and not blow up? And how did a taxi get hit by a light pole by there? If it was a missle, it would of blown up when it hit the light pole.

Last edited by BWOG (2010-01-30 14:42:40)

Offline

 

Board footer