funkymonkey wrote:
it rained a couple days ago... what is the big thing about that?
In winter, it's suppossed to SNOW in Minnesota, gar!
lol......gar.
Last edited by littletonkslover (2010-01-30 13:28:50)

Offline
ScratchX wrote:
12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not
![]()
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just KiddingIt fun to see what you guys think about 9/11
Actually, I'm 14
Offline
filo5 wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not
![]()
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just KiddingIt fun to see what you guys think about 9/11
Actually, I'm 14
lol yeah i can assure you I am not 12. but i'm pretty sure adriangl is, or he's 9 or something? i can't remember

Offline
funkymonkey wrote:
filo5 wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not
![]()
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just KiddingIt fun to see what you guys think about 9/11
Actually, I'm 14
lol yeah i can assure you I am not 12. but i'm pretty sure adriangl is, or he's 9 or something? i can't remember
I'm 11.

Offline
filo5 wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not
![]()
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just KiddingIt fun to see what you guys think about 9/11
Actually, I'm 14
I find that hard to believe because of your behaviour on wave.
lol - kidding.
Offline
funkymonkey wrote:
filo5 wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
12 year olds debating if 9/11 happened or not
![]()
WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!
Just KiddingIt fun to see what you guys think about 9/11
Actually, I'm 14
lol yeah i can assure you I am not 12. but i'm pretty sure adriangl is, or he's 9 or something? i can't remember
11, not 12, I am just mature for my age
Now let's get back on topic, enough on "global warming"
Offline
Just watched another video. This one from 500 yards away taken from inside an apartment. Shows a whole new view. There is no way two planes hitting where the fire was could have made the building collapse, There was definitely a bomb somewhere inside.
Offline
adriangl wrote:
Just watched another video. This one from 500 yards away taken from inside an apartment. Shows a whole new view. There is no way two planes hitting where the fire was could have made the building collapse, There was definitely a bomb somewhere inside.
There could have been bombs IN the airplanes ehh?
Offline
ScratchX wrote:
adriangl wrote:
Just watched another video. This one from 500 yards away taken from inside an apartment. Shows a whole new view. There is no way two planes hitting where the fire was could have made the building collapse, There was definitely a bomb somewhere inside.
There could have been bombs IN the airplanes ehh?
![]()
That went down all the stairs to the first floor, and then blew up. Very realistic
Offline
adriangl wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
adriangl wrote:
Just watched another video. This one from 500 yards away taken from inside an apartment. Shows a whole new view. There is no way two planes hitting where the fire was could have made the building collapse, There was definitely a bomb somewhere inside.
There could have been bombs IN the airplanes ehh?
![]()
That went down all the stairs to the first floor, and then blew up. Very realistic
![]()
The bomb being IN the plane or IN the building?
Offline
ScratchX wrote:
adriangl wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
There could have been bombs IN the airplanes ehh?![]()
That went down all the stairs to the first floor, and then blew up. Very realistic
![]()
The bomb being IN the plane or IN the building?
What? Okay, let me explain again. For the building to collapse like it did, there would have to be bombs on the first few floors. Even a bomb in the plane would just explode where the plane was, which is the top of the building, thus, not resulting in the building collapsing.
Offline
First of all, only 2 planes hit the WTC towers. There were 4 planes hijacked, but only 3 of them hit any buildings. Also, I don't believe that there were any bombs because the government would not do something like that. If there were any bombs, they were placed before the airplane hit the building. And a plane smashing into a building would damage it enough that it would possibly make the building collapse.
Offline
BWOG wrote:
First of all, only 2 planes hit the WTC towers. There were 4 planes hijacked, but only 3 of them hit any buildings. Also, I don't believe that there were any bombs because the government would not do something like that. If there were any bombs, they were placed before the airplane hit the building. And a plane smashing into a building would damage it enough that it would possibly make the building collapse.
How do you know 4 were hijacked? They only found 3 planes. More lies from the government. And 1 plane hitting the second tower makes it collapse when it took two planes for the first tower? Bombs, lies, cover-ups.
Offline
No, the third plane *cough cough* hit *cough cough* Pentagon, and the fourth one crashed on a field. Actually, it was just some metal junk scattered around. No real plane parts. How does that feel?
Offline
filo5 wrote:
No, the third plane *cough cough* hit *cough cough* Pentagon, and the fourth one crashed on a field. Actually, it was just some metal junk scattered around. No real plane parts. How does that feel?
Umm, then why did they never find plane parts in the Pentagon.http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/ … re=related There, proof that there was no plane, but an explosion. Good enough?
Offline
filo5 wrote:
No, the third plane *cough cough* hit *cough cough* Pentagon, and the fourth one crashed on a field. Actually, it was just some metal junk scattered around. No real plane parts. How does that feel?
You're right. American Airlines flight 11 and United Airlines flight 175 both hit the WTC towers. AA flight 77 hit the Pentagon, and UA flight 93 crashed in Pennslvania.
Offline
@adriangl that's why *cough cough*. You think I didn't know that? I watched loose change-final cut. I know what d'you mean.
Last edited by filo5 (2010-01-30 14:36:01)
Offline
adriangl wrote:
filo5 wrote:
No, the third plane *cough cough* hit *cough cough* Pentagon, and the fourth one crashed on a field. Actually, it was just some metal junk scattered around. No real plane parts. How does that feel?
Umm, then why did they never find plane parts in the Pentagon.http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/ … re=related There, proof that there was no plane, but an explosion. Good enough?
Then how about this:
Now do you see the plane? And the plane isn't trees, as it's gone in the second frame.
Last edited by BWOG (2010-01-30 14:36:27)
Offline
filo5 wrote:
I know what you mean. Why would the plane leave exhaust trail? normally, they're visible only on high heights.
If the plane hit the ground, it would of probably hit the fuselage, which would make it catch on fire.
Offline
filo5 wrote:
so? still, the smoke would be black. And this one's whiteish-grey. you know what leaves trails like that? missiles.
And how would a missile be that low and not blow up? And how did a taxi get hit by a light pole by there? If it was a missle, it would of blown up when it hit the light pole.
Last edited by BWOG (2010-01-30 14:42:40)
Offline