I made a chart displaying the number of Scratch projects on the website. I will update it every sunday. After a while we may be able to predict when we will reach 1,000,000 projects!
Current 1,000,000 prediction date:
October 2010
Here are the progress charts:
Points of Interest:
The spike at week 5-6, Thanksgiving week.
The fall at week 9-10, Christmas week.
The spike at week 10-11, new year's week.
Data:
1. 573587
2. 581847
3. 589740
4. 597465
5. 604688
6. 614437
7. 621479
8. 629111
9. 636673
10. 642656
11. 651219
12. 657544
13. 665199
14. 673481
15. 681905
16. 689652
17. 698305
Made in Microsoft Office Excel 2007
Last edited by illusionist (2010-02-14 13:46:53)
Offline
Offline
jacool wrote:
Nice, do you use any special software for the chart or like excel?
You are both right.
I use Xcell. It IS DA WORST EVAHHHH
EDIT:
Now I use Excel 2007!
Last edited by illusionist (2009-12-08 09:00:21)
Offline
The rate of projects uploaded is ever increasing, so your prediction may be wrong.
Offline
floatingmagictree wrote:
The rate of projects uploaded is ever increasing, so your prediction may be wrong.
SO FAR it looks like we will hit 1,000,000 before...
Offline
illusionist wrote:
floatingmagictree wrote:
The rate of projects uploaded is ever increasing, so your prediction may be wrong.
SO FAR it looks like we will hit 1,000,000 before...
I predict we will hit 1,000,000 before the end of 2010.
Offline
floatingmagictree wrote:
illusionist wrote:
floatingmagictree wrote:
The rate of projects uploaded is ever increasing, so your prediction may be wrong.
SO FAR it looks like we will hit 1,000,000 before...
I predict we will hit 1,000,000 before the end of 2010.
I agree. I was basing my prediction off of the data I have collected.
I don't think that data is ready to tell the future yet though.
We need to find the rate of increase to properly date 1,000,000.
Last edited by illusionist (2009-11-16 20:38:56)
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
We definately need more data.
Only time will tell![]()
I managed to fill the 4-week gap. Is 6 points enough data?
Offline
7 point added!
I noticed a slightly higher rise this time! This proves that the frequency of uploads per week is changing!
Offline
*Drumroll please*
I have calculated...
That we will reach 1,000,000 projects...
in early December 2010.
What's more, I didn't adjust it for inflation, so it will happen earlier.
I'll look at the patterns and find a more appropriate date.
My calculator showed it would take:
54.729613733905579399141630901288 weeks to do it. Just more than a year.
Notice a pattern here?
It took two years to reach 500,000 and it took 1 year to reach 1,000,000. So it'll take six months to reach 2,000,000 after we reach 1,000,000. The rate is quadrupuling. Probably I'm wrong though.
Last edited by Greatdane (2009-11-22 12:26:24)
Offline
Greatdane wrote:
*Drumroll please*
I have calculated...
That we will reach 1,000,000 projects...
in early December 2010.
What's more, I didn't adjust it for inflation, so it will happen earlier.
I'll look at the patterns and find a more appropriate date.
My calculator showed it would take:
54.729613733905579399141630901288 weeks to do it. Just more than a year.
Notice a pattern here?
It took two years to reach 500,000 and it took 1 year to reach 1,000,000. So it'll take six months to reach 2,000,000 after we reach 1,000,000. The rate is quadrupuling. Probably I'm wrong though.
Your prediction also matches FMT's!
I think I'll add this to my sig...
Offline
The equation of the graph for the first 7 weeks is 7820 x weeks + 550380
and it has a very strong relationship of 0.99998869 out of 1.
So by week 57.4962 there will be 1000000. So it will be between 20-24 december 2010 if the rate of change doesn't increase.
These equations proudly brought to you by my $300 doller caculator
Last edited by what-the (2009-11-22 21:07:01)
My site Offline
You won't believe this guys...
The rate is decreasing. As my list says:
604688
597465 Difference: 7223
589740 Difference: 7725
581847 Difference: 7893
573953 Difference: 7894
565960 Difference: 7993
557967 Difference: 7993
It's real. It's true. And I proved it.
The number will come down.
Offline
Greatdane wrote:
You won't believe this guys...
The rate is decreasing. As my list says:
604688
597465 Difference: 7223
589740 Difference: 7725
581847 Difference: 7893
573953 Difference: 7894
565960 Difference: 7993
557967 Difference: 7993
It's real. It's true. And I proved it.
The number will come down.
What two numbers are the differences between? and sorry about the identicle intervals.
I had to find some way to fill the gap...
I Guess I should have varied it more...
At least two of the values are fake.
Last edited by illusionist (2009-11-22 21:22:43)
Offline
Greatdane wrote:
You won't believe this guys...
The rate is decreasing. As my list says:
604688
597465 Difference: 7223
589740 Difference: 7725
581847 Difference: 7893
573953 Difference: 7894
565960 Difference: 7993
557967 Difference: 7993
It's real. It's true. And I proved it.
The number will come down.
Yeah that came up in my calculations but like I said the equation was 7820 x weeks + 550380 even with that in mind and thats why my prediction is in december and not before it. Once there's about 15 weeks of real data and not made up data to fill the spaces, then I could predict the equation with more accuracy but remember all predictions are incorrect unless the relationship is 1 or -1. (but a relationship of 0.9999 like I got is fine to use)
My site Offline
what-the wrote:
Greatdane wrote:
You won't believe this guys...
The rate is decreasing. As my list says:
604688
597465 Difference: 7223
589740 Difference: 7725
581847 Difference: 7893
573953 Difference: 7894
565960 Difference: 7993
557967 Difference: 7993
It's real. It's true. And I proved it.
The number will come down.Yeah that came up in my calculations but like I said the equation was 7820 x weeks + 550380 even with that in mind and thats why my prediction is in december and not before it. Once there's about 15 weeks of real data and not made up data to fill the spaces, then I could predict the equation with more accuracy but remember all predictions are incorrect unless the relationship is 1 or -1. (but a relationship of 0.9999 like I got is fine to use)
I will remove the fake data once I update this again.
Offline
what-the wrote:
These equations proudly brought to you by my $300 doller caculator
![]()
I can do it with my 100 dollar one. Have you thought of a quadratic equation might be a better fit? Probably will once we get more data.
Offline
TheSaint wrote:
what-the wrote:
These equations proudly brought to you by my $300 doller caculator
![]()
I can do it with my 100 dollar one. Have you thought of a quadratic equation might be a better fit? Probably will once we get more data.
Bow down to my o mighty powerful touch screen caculator that you can play games on and with a screen bigger than the nintendo dsi's, it's awesome.
_____________________________
I did think of a quadratic equation but the linear equation had a relationship of 0.9999 which is almost perfect and a quadratic equation would be something like 0.001
My site Offline
what-the wrote:
TheSaint wrote:
what-the wrote:
These equations proudly brought to you by my $300 doller caculator
![]()
I can do it with my 100 dollar one. Have you thought of a quadratic equation might be a better fit? Probably will once we get more data.
Bow down to my o mighty powerful touch screen caculator that you can play games on and with a screen bigger than the nintendo dsi's, it's awesome.
_____________________________
I did think of a quadratic equation but the linear equation had a relationship of 0.9999 which is almost perfect and a quadratic equation would be something like 0.001
I may not have a touch screen, but my calculator has Super Mario, Pheonix Z, Snake, Mario Level Creator, Fast Tunnel, Avalanche, Connect 4, Boxing, Lotus, and Fall Down
Offline