soupoftomato wrote:
I've never really cared for wanting an Incredibles sequel.
Or a Finding Nemo sequel.
I can't picture Toy Story without a sequel (because I wasn't alive when it came out, most likely :P )
And I probably would have preferred a Monsters Inc. sequel not prequel
but eh.
But I mean, they all wrap themselves up really well! And some of them definitely don't need sequels.
But a Bug's Life one could be cool but you never really hear about that movie.
I think a Bug's Life works great as a standalone, but it's very underrated these days.
Also Monsters Inc. works better as a prequel, because afterwords you don't really know where they can go from there, but with a prequel we're seeing how Mike and Sulley first began their relationship and where everything comes into place.
Besides I'm still having trouble believing that Finding Dory is actually happening. I refuse to believe! I refuse!
Also Toy Story even when you just watch it without seeing the other two, it still kind of opens doors for sequels.
Last edited by banana500 (2013-04-04 23:52:05)
Offline
the incredibles ended implying that there would be a sequel and then there wasnt one which irked me a bit
i agree with señor soup on the others, though: they wrap themselves up
((btw thats how i feel about toy story 2 also! toy story 3 should go away))
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
the incredibles ended implying that there would be a sequel and then there wasnt one which irked me a bit
i agree with señor soup on the others, though: they wrap themselves up
((btw thats how i feel about toy story 2 also! toy story 3 should go away))
Why didn't you like Toy Story 3?
Offline
banana500 wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
the incredibles ended implying that there would be a sequel and then there wasnt one which irked me a bit
i agree with señor soup on the others, though: they wrap themselves up
((btw thats how i feel about toy story 2 also! toy story 3 should go away))Why didn't you like Toy Story 3?
Offline
Cozyhut3 wrote:
Glad I'm not the only one who knows about this! I have a friend who's going to be eccastic, but I myself want...
...an Incredibles sequel. Brilliant minds think alike, hm?
Anybody with a good taste in movies are brilliant.
When I heard this was announced I was like OMG!
Offline
I think its a weird idea. I dont know the plotline yet, but...idk. It just seems like Nemo should have stopped at the first movie. Although I can see Dory getting lost very easily, lol.
My friend is ecstatic about this movie though.
Offline
Waffle27 wrote:
I think its a weird idea. I dont know the plotline yet, but...idk. It just seems like Nemo should have stopped at the first movie. Although I can see Dory getting lost very easily, lol.
My friend is ecstatic about this movie though.
I'm pretty sure it's about Dory's past. Why was Dory in the middle of the ocean? I heard that they are searching for Dory's family or something. I don't remember.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
banana500 wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
the incredibles ended implying that there would be a sequel and then there wasnt one which irked me a bit
i agree with señor soup on the others, though: they wrap themselves up
((btw thats how i feel about toy story 2 also! toy story 3 should go away))Why didn't you like Toy Story 3?
Okay then I'm sorry if I've asked too many times. I have a habit of repeating myself.
Offline
Sellout wrote:
For a long time I thought Toy Story 2 was the first and only one because that was the only one we had on tape. I think I was 8 or 9 when I saw the first one
me too!!! thats like my exact life
Offline
Sellout wrote:
For a long time I thought Toy Story 2 was the first and only one because that was the only one we had on tape. I think I was 8 or 9 when I saw the first one
Funny thing is that I can't remember at which point in my life I actually understood what went on in Toy Story. I know it was at a very young age, but it's still very unclear to me. Same as when you can't remember when you began remembering things.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
Sellout wrote:
For a long time I thought Toy Story 2 was the first and only one because that was the only one we had on tape. I think I was 8 or 9 when I saw the first one
me too!!! thats like my exact life
Copycat. Get your own life!
Offline
Sellout wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
Sellout wrote:
For a long time I thought Toy Story 2 was the first and only one because that was the only one we had on tape. I think I was 8 or 9 when I saw the first one
me too!!! thats like my exact life
Copycat. Get your own life!
i had my life first!!
Offline
I'm really excited for this. Thank god it wasn't Planes.
Offline
banana500 wrote:
mythbusteranimator wrote:
AnimeCreatorArtist wrote:
Yeah, Incredibles was due for a sequel a long time ago
I'm sorry, but what was so good about that movie?
It was (I think) Pixar's first movie with mainly human characters, but the humans didn't look realistic, but that added to the charm.
pixar is never ever ever going to make realistic people
Offline
NeilWest wrote:
I'm really excited for this. Thank god it wasn't Planes.
They are going to make that though.
And I think the only Pixar movies that shouldn't have sequels are Up, Bug's Life, Wall. E, and Brave.
Offline
mythbusteranimator wrote:
AnimeCreatorArtist wrote:
Yeah, Incredibles was due for a sequel a long time ago
I'm sorry, but what was so good about that movie?
What?!?!?! It's one of my favourite superhero movies! I much prefer it to The Avengers.
Offline
Waffle27 wrote:
My friend is ecstatic about this movie though.
I bet we share the same friend. :3
Anywho, I'd like to point out that Planes isn't being made by Pixar, since it was mentioned earlier in the thread. It is actually being made by Disney.
Offline
haxcharsol wrote:
NeilWest wrote:
I'm really excited for this. Thank god it wasn't Planes.
They are going to make that though.
And I think the only Pixar movies that shouldn't have sequels are Up, Bug's Life, Wall. E, and Brave.
Yeah.
Offline
Honestly, I was watching Up the other day (Which is a fantastic film, don't get me wrong) but I was really distracted by how out of place and ridiculous the blocky, smooth, people looked when all other details and surfaces were beautifully rendered. I understand the style + separation of reality and fantasy they're trying to convey with it but it still looks so strange and wrong to me :'(
Offline
Sellout wrote:
Honestly, I was watching Up the other day (Which is a fantastic film, don't get me wrong) but I was really distracted by how out of place and ridiculous the blocky, smooth, people looked when all other details and surfaces were beautifully rendered. I understand the style + separation of reality and fantasy they're trying to convey with it but it still looks so strange and wrong to me :'(
I was watching it and pointing out some impossibilities and plot holes
Offline
mythbusteranimator wrote:
Sellout wrote:
Honestly, I was watching Up the other day (Which is a fantastic film, don't get me wrong) but I was really distracted by how out of place and ridiculous the blocky, smooth, people looked when all other details and surfaces were beautifully rendered. I understand the style + separation of reality and fantasy they're trying to convey with it but it still looks so strange and wrong to me :'(
I was watching it and pointing out some impossibilities and plot holes
Yeah, the first time I watched it I really didn't like it because of how silly it got after they reached South America. The second time I watched it, I stopped watching before it got to that point! ^O^
Offline
mythbusteranimator wrote:
Sellout wrote:
Honestly, I was watching Up the other day (Which is a fantastic film, don't get me wrong) but I was really distracted by how out of place and ridiculous the blocky, smooth, people looked when all other details and surfaces were beautifully rendered. I understand the style + separation of reality and fantasy they're trying to convey with it but it still looks so strange and wrong to me :'(
I was watching it and pointing out some impossibilities and plot holes
What do you mean?
Offline