Scratch

Firedrake969 wrote:

ActionTrev wrote:

Firedrake969 wrote:

Sorry, no, it seems like an uncredited remix of this.

Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa! Take a look at that one you just suggested, and then look at wariobro's. Donkey Kong is a highly remade game, so you can't just say it's a remix! I'm wariobro's actual brother and I know for a fact that this game was completely original. He even custom made that level! And to be honest, wariobro's project is a heck of a lot better than your 'uncredited remix.'

1.  Anybody can say anything on the internet, how do I know?
2.  I've seen too many with the same scripts.  About 20.
3.  He didn't custom make the level.
4.  It isn't better or worse.

1.  You're right. Anyone can say anything. So, how do we know that you didn't like the game and are just hiding your emotions through the Internet. We are legit brothers.
2.  Well, Donkey Kong is Donkey Kong, no matter how it's made. Also, take a look at that first fire. It doesn't move like that in any other game I've ever played/seen.
3.  He took like 2 hrs. on that level. The original Spriter's Resource sheet was too skinny and tall, so he custom made one to fit.
4.  It may not be better or worse, but in my opinion it is. Besides, what makes your opinion any better than anyone else? Just because you can post reviews doesn't make it any more true.

Firedrake969 wrote:

LockedOn wrote:

Here's another one!

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/LockedOn/3001529

Sorry for the long string, I would have posted after you'd reviewed the others, but I might have forgotten to if I waited. 

-- LockedOn.

GAME:
Originality:  8/10--nice.
Addictiveness/replayability:  3/10--buggy
Sounds:  2/5--repetitive, when it glitched, the loop broke
Graphics:  3/5--good graphics separately, together, they didn't fit.
Smoothness of scripts:  4/10--you used the when key pressed hat block...
Any bugs/glitches:  3/10--Couldn't go two directions at once (see above), enemy couldn't attack in a certain way
Length (too long/too short):  3/10--you had to wait a while to find the enemy, you couldn't really beat the enemy
Ease of use:  3/10--see all above, you didn't have good instructions
Plot:  2/10--No plot.
My comments:  15/20
I liked the idea and such of this.  However, because of all the glitches, it was marked down.

SCORE:  46/100

Thank you for the review. 
I'm especially thankful that you gave me a few suggestions on ways to improve the game, as I'm trying to make this game better with each iteration. However, I have a few gripes, (doesn't everyone?), that'd I'd like to get out of my system.

You said that not being able to go two directions at once was a glitch, but I don't think it counts as a glitch, I just didn't code it in, (will definitely fix in 1.9). The length was indeed too short— you only played the demo version, which also does not include the plot, that comes in a bit later, in the full game.

I'm sorry to "review your review" so to speak, but this game took a long time for me to complete,  (everything you see and hear was created by me, over the course of many months), and, as its creator, my only intent is for you to enjoy it, and since it seems as though you didn't I felt the need to explain myself. 

That said, thank you again for the prompt review. Don't feel like you have to re-review it because of my comments, I know you said you would be harsh in your first post. 

-- LockedOn.

Firedrake969 wrote:

LockedOn wrote:

Firedrake969 wrote:

GAME:
Originality:  8/10--nice.
Addictiveness/replayability:  3/10--buggy
Sounds:  2/5--repetitive, when it glitched, the loop broke
Graphics:  3/5--good graphics separately, together, they didn't fit.
Smoothness of scripts:  4/10--you used the when key pressed hat block...
Any bugs/glitches:  3/10--Couldn't go two directions at once (see above), enemy couldn't attack in a certain way
Length (too long/too short):  3/10--you had to wait a while to find the enemy, you couldn't really beat the enemy
Ease of use:  3/10--see all above, you didn't have good instructions
Plot:  2/10--No plot.
My comments:  15/20
I liked the idea and such of this.  However, because of all the glitches, it was marked down.

SCORE:  46/100

Thank you for the review. 
I'm especially thankful that you gave me a few suggestions on ways to improve the game, as I'm trying to make this game better with each iteration. However, I have a few gripes, (doesn't everyone?), that'd I'd like to get out of my system.

You said that not being able to go two directions at once was a glitch, but I don't think it counts as a glitch, I just didn't code it in, (will definitely fix in 1.9). The length was indeed too short— you only played the demo version, which also does not include the plot, that comes in a bit later, in the full game.

I'm sorry to "review your review" so to speak, but this game took a long time for me to complete,  (everything you see and hear was created by me, over the course of many months), and, as its creator, my only intent is for you to enjoy it, and since it seems as though you didn't I felt the need to explain myself. 

That said, thank you again for the prompt review. Don't feel like you have to re-review it because of my comments, I know you said you would be harsh in your first post. 

-- LockedOn.

   Thanks for the feedback.  I know it's a demo, so I suggested things you may want to change/add.

I'll be updating a lot in 1.9, definitely. A lot of the reviews I've received so far have been very helpful. 
If you can tell me which sound loop was glitching, that'd be helpful so I can get a fix up and running soon. 

-- LockedOn.

can you check out my first project that I have uploaded, it might not be vey much and I am aware of bugs.

Borrego6165 wrote:

Would you be able to rate the first two of these (I'm not sure if the first long is long enough for you to have reviewed it deep enough, but I had to make them short so people could learn easier)

Python Lesson 1
Python Lesson 2

Thanks!

Sorry, it doesn't fit any category.

OS:
Originality:  3/10--Basic OS.
Addictiveness/reuseability:  3/10--Your basic OS.
Sounds:  5/5
Graphics:  3/5---Text in extras was hard to read.  Nice graphics for everything else.
Smoothness of scripts:  8/10--Relatively smooth
Any bugs/glitches:  2/10--Wouldn't let me exit an app.
Apps (enough, too few, I got lost in too many):  X/10
Ease of use:  3/10--please enter soconds?  No instructions?
Usefulness to owner:  3/10--Basic OS, same apps and such.
My comments:  15/20
Pretty nice OS.  I liked the sliding-out feature!  Gives a unique twist.  I'd suggest adding a start-up.

SCORE:  42/100

Firedrake969 wrote:

Bump

/http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Vortex_/3031053

This is my game Paper Avoid. Please review it. (Note: There is no plot, as this game is a series of related mini-games)

sonicfan12p wrote:

Hello Firedrake, I've created a thread to track the top ten rated projects of the week. I was wondering if every Friday, starting today, that you could post on that thread telling me the two projects that received the highest rating from your reviewer that week? Thanks if you can!

Ok, sure.  I posted on it.
@numberonegamers No, read the rules.

creeperangel wrote:

Check out my characters, Mr. Meow and AngelClaw! Can you advertise/review them? PLEASE *does cute kitty eyes*

Sorry but if you read the OP, I don't do art, and you're kind of spamming by asking for advertisement.

hmm bumpa

If you want to jump out of your skin play/review this game.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/fredmaster45/3031010

Bump--New logo!