for making a scratch account, I think there should be censors on the name (if already there, add more words), because what good can happen from a user who's name has another term for adult entertainment in it, (I'm making this suggestion because the mods aren't on and there's commercial spam for it)?
Offline
So, from looking at the code, there is indeed a censor in the usernames. It censors out most bad words.
However, I just looked through the censor list, and the word you are referencing there wasn't on it (although it is censored on the forums). I agree, it should be there, at least in Scratch 2.0.
(I support, just giving a technical explanation)
Last edited by jvvg (2012-11-20 21:44:24)
Offline
jvvg wrote:
So, from looking at the code, there is indeed a censor in the usernames. It censors out most bad words.
However, I just looked through the censor list, and the word you are referencing there wasn't on it (although it is censored on the forums). I agree, it should be there, at least in Scratch 2.0.
(I support, just giving a technical explanation)
it's not censored on the forums. The website the commercial spammer was linking to, had the term in there, in a post, on the forums.
Offline
jvvg wrote:
So, from looking at the code, there is indeed a censor in the usernames. It censors out most bad words.
However, I just looked through the censor list, and the word you are referencing there wasn't on it (although it is censored on the forums). I agree, it should be there, at least in Scratch 2.0.
(I support, just giving a technical explanation)
How exactly did you look at the code, I'm just curious.
Also, do you really get banned for using the word ****?
Last edited by sparks (2012-11-21 12:09:06)
Offline
zammer990 wrote:
Also, do you really get banned for using the word ****?
On a first offence I doubt you would get banned, though it depends on the context. But the word would be removed and I don't think the moderation team would be very happy with you!
Has the commercial spam people were talking about above been cleaned up?
EDIT: Never mind, I see it's been deleted already
The thing with word censoring is often best known as the Scunthorpe Problem. If you read the linked wiki page, perhaps you can see the problems with having an automatic filter like the one you suggest. Usually us Mods or one of the community spot the name and it's removed fairly quickly anyway, which is a slower, but more failproof method.
EDIT2: I've removed the link to the Scunthorpe problem Wikipedia page. Don't be surprised if you check it out yourself and discover that a page DISCUSSING bad language filters contains some. ¬_¬
Last edited by sparks (2012-11-21 16:15:36)
Offline
soniku3 wrote:
zammer990 wrote:
How exactly did you look at the code, I'm just curious.
He has a copy of the Scratch website.
can i have the code
Offline
mythbusteranimator wrote:
soniku3 wrote:
zammer990 wrote:
How exactly did you look at the code, I'm just curious.
He has a copy of the Scratch website.
can i have the code
Scratch is open source and the code can be found on Assembla. He'll probably link to it.
Offline
Yup, the code for the Scratch Forums can be found here: https://www.assembla.com/code/scratchfo … sion/nodes
Last edited by sparks (2012-11-21 16:15:01)
Offline
sparks wrote:
zammer990 wrote:
Also, do you really get banned for using the word ****?
On a first offence I doubt you would get banned, though it depends on the context. But the word would be removed and I don't think the moderation team would be very happy with you!
Has the commercial spam people were talking about above been cleaned up?
EDIT: Never mind, I see it's been deleted already
The thing with word censoring is often best known as the Scunthorpe Problem. If you read the linked wiki page, perhaps you can see the problems with having an automatic filter like the one you suggest. Usually us Mods or one of the community spot the name and it's removed fairly quickly anyway, which is a slower, but more failproof method.
EDIT2: I've removed the link to the Scunthorpe problem Wikipedia page. Don't be surprised if you check it out yourself and discover that a page DISCUSSING bad language filters contains some. ¬_¬
That link contains inappropriate language on the page.
Last edited by sparks (2012-11-21 16:16:03)
Offline
joefarebrother wrote:
sparks wrote:
zammer990 wrote:
Also, do you really get banned for using the word ****?
On a first offence I doubt you would get banned, though it depends on the context. But the word would be removed and I don't think the moderation team would be very happy with you!
Has the commercial spam people were talking about above been cleaned up?
EDIT: Never mind, I see it's been deleted already
The thing with word censoring is often best known as the Scunthorpe Problem. If you read the linked wiki page, perhaps you can see the problems with having an automatic filter like the one you suggest. Usually us Mods or one of the community spot the name and it's removed fairly quickly anyway, which is a slower, but more failproof method.
EDIT2: I've removed the link to the Scunthorpe problem Wikipedia page. Don't be surprised if you check it out yourself and discover that a page DISCUSSING bad language filters contains some. ¬_¬That link contains inappropriate language on the page.
While it's protocol, is a child really going to scroll through a wikipedia page?
Last edited by sparks (2012-11-21 16:16:28)
Offline