Well, at least you don't pay $10 a month for the Microsoft Wireless watch...
Offline
Mokat wrote:
The iPhone 3 is like $1 at Walmart
*Cough*andthe4sodon'twasteyourtimebuyingthatone*
Offline
I've actually been thinking of purchasing an iPhone (4s or 5) or iPod touch (2012) without a cellular plan to use as a camera and such. My iPad 2 cameras are absolutely awful. Unfortunately they're insanely expensive without the contract. Like, I could buy a decent SLR for the same price.
Last edited by 16Skittles (2012-10-21 10:24:54)
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
I've actually been thinking of purchasing an iPhone (4s or 5) or iPod touch (2012) without a cellular plan to use as a camera and such. My iPad 2 cameras are absolutely awful. Unfortunately they're insanely expensive without the contract. Like, I could buy a decent SLR for the same price.
You should probably get the iPod touch 2012. From what I can tell, it has a pretty decent camera. I have an iPad 3, and I've used the camera on that a lot. The 5MP still shots look nice, but only from the rear camera--the front facing camera pictures are awful, since they're so grainy. The 1080p video on the iPad 3 is not bad, actually. When you're shooting, it looks pretty bad, but when it comes out, it's about the same quality as a camcorder. I believe the iPod touch has the same camera specs too.
Though the iPod touch would be the better choice, since its smaller and more portable.
Offline
banana500 wrote:
16Skittles wrote:
I've actually been thinking of purchasing an iPhone (4s or 5) or iPod touch (2012) without a cellular plan to use as a camera and such. My iPad 2 cameras are absolutely awful. Unfortunately they're insanely expensive without the contract. Like, I could buy a decent SLR for the same price.
You should probably get the iPod touch 2012. From what I can tell, it has a pretty decent camera. I have an iPad 3, and I've used the camera on that a lot. The 5MP still shots look nice, but only from the rear camera--the front facing camera pictures are awful, since they're so grainy. The 1080p video on the iPad 3 is not bad, actually. When you're shooting, it looks pretty bad, but when it comes out, it's about the same quality as a camcorder. I believe the iPod touch has the same camera specs too.
Though the iPod touch would be the better choice, since its smaller and more portable.
Oh, it would just break my back to carry around an iPhone
The main reason an iPhone would be even considered is that if/when I want a plan, I could just switch in a SIM card and not need another phone. But this is really pretty off topic The camera on the iPad 2 is just pathetic.
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
banana500 wrote:
16Skittles wrote:
I've actually been thinking of purchasing an iPhone (4s or 5) or iPod touch (2012) without a cellular plan to use as a camera and such. My iPad 2 cameras are absolutely awful. Unfortunately they're insanely expensive without the contract. Like, I could buy a decent SLR for the same price.
You should probably get the iPod touch 2012. From what I can tell, it has a pretty decent camera. I have an iPad 3, and I've used the camera on that a lot. The 5MP still shots look nice, but only from the rear camera--the front facing camera pictures are awful, since they're so grainy. The 1080p video on the iPad 3 is not bad, actually. When you're shooting, it looks pretty bad, but when it comes out, it's about the same quality as a camcorder. I believe the iPod touch has the same camera specs too.
Though the iPod touch would be the better choice, since its smaller and more portable.Oh, it would just break my back to carry around an iPhone
The main reason an iPhone would be even considered is that if/when I want a plan, I could just switch in a SIM card and not need another phone. But this is really pretty off topic The camera on the iPad 2 is just pathetic.
An iPhone would be fine too, if you don't mind paying extra for the service, or extra for unlocking it.
Offline
We're just one short day (less, actually) away from the event!
Offline
A rumor I saw on Gizmodo suggested that the iPad Mini may be named the "iPad Air."
Offline
I look forward to a Retina-ready Macbook.
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
A rumor I saw on Gizmodo suggested that the iPad Mini may be named the "iPad Air."
That'd be a cooler name.
Offline
Hours away! I'm still not convinced about the iPad mini though.
Offline
So, they only announced a 13" rMBP?
Offline
Well there is a new Mac mini, and the iPad mini is also there!!!!!
Offline
New iMac is amazing, but no optical drive? I'm sticking with mine
Offline
iPad Mini = not that great, I'd never buy it...but it's good for those who want to spend less than $499
Offline
You said something negative about apple!! :0
Offline
I'd rather buy a Kindle Fire and spend the $130 I'd save on content and apps.
Plus, the Kindle Fire runs flash, so it works with Scratch.
Offline
BoltBait wrote:
I'd rather buy a Kindle Fire and spend the $130 I'd save on content and apps.
Plus, the Kindle Fire runs flash, so it works with Scratch.
If you got the iPad, I'd be happy to send you a copy of the Scratch app to install, so that's not a problem.
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
You said something negative about apple!! :0
I'm not (or at least really try not to be) an Apple fanboy that just loves everything Apple and hates everything Microsoft. I actually care about the best technology, no matter who it's from. But, it's true that I'm a big Apple fan, and enjoy their technology over other companies in general.
Offline
stevetheipad wrote:
BoltBait wrote:
I'd rather buy a Kindle Fire and spend the $130 I'd save on content and apps.
Plus, the Kindle Fire runs flash, so it works with Scratch.If you got the iPad, I'd be happy to send you a copy of the Scratch app to install, so that's not a problem.
Scratch app?
Offline
Mokat wrote:
The iPhone 3 is like $1 at Walmart
The iPhone 4 is FREE at Apple's site. (I'm guessing you have to buy a wireless plan with it, though.)
Offline
technoboy10 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
BoltBait wrote:
I'd rather buy a Kindle Fire and spend the $130 I'd save on content and apps.
Plus, the Kindle Fire runs flash, so it works with Scratch.If you got the iPad, I'd be happy to send you a copy of the Scratch app to install, so that's not a problem.
Scratch app?
Woah, steve even made an app??? ME WANT NOW!
Offline