Scratch

SilverBells · 2012-09-21 22:32:37

Is it necessary? I'm just suggesting that we remove this, but you post excessively, like 6 posts in a minute, then it'll stop you. But I think it'll be much easier and more convenient if we don't have to wait 60/180 seconds in between posting. ^_^ Thanks~ c:x

funelephant · 2012-09-21 22:35:35

Read this

Wes64 · 2012-09-21 22:37:28

it's to stop commercial spammers and regular spammers

this way they won't be able to post spam out of control. i think a small sacrifice of 1/3 minute is much better than having forums full of spam

edit: grr outposted

Last edited by Wes64 (2012-09-21 22:37:51)

SilverBells · 2012-09-21 22:38:13

funelephant wrote:
Read this

Sorry 'bout that. ^^"

funelephant · 2012-09-21 22:40:00

It's no biggie!

Just remember to read that before you suggest anything wink

chongyian · 2012-09-24 01:51:58

Yes, true, or else it will just waste time and effort to close the topic, or even open the topic in the first place...

soniku3 · 2012-09-24 06:47:20

chongyian wrote:
Yes, true, or else it will just waste time and effort to close the topic, or even open the topic in the first place...

That's why I made a topic about it! big_smile

KrIsMa · 2012-09-24 13:18:34

The 60/180 rule is for anti spam, because a spammer could just type a useless post, and send it,and keep doing it again. The 180 rule is because new scratchers may be spammers, and the Scratch team only upgrades a new scratcher to a scratcher because they trust the scratcher and believes that the scratcher is not spam bot or a "troll".

Mokat · 2012-09-24 22:09:27

Yes.

JH1010 · 2012-09-25 02:34:34

The 60/180 second rule stops spammers. They can only spam once every 3 minutes. It is very unlikely for a Scratcher to spam so I do not see the point of the 60 second rule, but the 180 second rule is needed.

500TH POST!

Mokat · 2012-09-25 17:45:56

JH1010 wrote:
The 60/180 second rule stops spammers. They can only spam once every 3 minutes. It is very unlikely for a Scratcher to spam so I do not see the point of the 60 second rule, but the 180 second rule is needed.

500TH POST!

Maybe it could be 59 seconds. tongue

chongyian · 2012-09-26 07:28:12

lol?

KrIsMa · 2012-09-26 10:31:58

Above

Please do not just post "lol". No one know what you are refering to and this can be refered as spam. If you really think something is funny, quote what you think is funny then say whatever you want.

dvd4 · 2012-09-26 18:06:42

answer:yes.

simple as that.

jukyter · 2012-09-26 18:15:22

KrIsMa wrote:
Above

Please do not just post "lol". No one know what you are refering to and this can be refered as spam. If you really think something is funny, quote what you think is funny then say whatever you want.

LOL

KrIsMa · 2012-09-26 19:14:48

jukyter wrote:
KrIsMa wrote:
Above

Please do not just post "lol". No one know what you are refering to and this can be refered as spam. If you really think something is funny, quote what you think is funny then say whatever you want.
LOL

Haha

dvd4 · 2012-09-26 21:23:51

KrIsMa wrote:
jukyter wrote:
KrIsMa wrote:
Above

Please do not just post "lol". No one know what you are refering to and this can be refered as spam. If you really think something is funny, quote what you think is funny then say whatever you want.
LOL
Haha

LOL

Mokat · 2012-09-26 21:30:23

dvd4 wrote:
KrIsMa wrote:
jukyter wrote:

LOL
Haha
LOL

soacl

mythbusteranimator · 2012-09-27 10:49:33

Lol=Laugh out Loud.

SOACL=Sitting On A Chair Laughing

KrIsMa · 2012-09-27 10:53:30

This is getting out of control. Please do not go off topic! Thanks!

The 60 180 rules is to prevent excessive spam, but Moderators do not have to wait 60 seconds because the scratch team trusts them.

mythbusteranimator · 2012-09-27 10:55:49

We know that; we are saying that for the more trusted members, maybe we can decrease the number of seconds.

dvd4 · 2012-09-27 15:08:57

mythbusteranimator wrote:
We know that; we are saying that for the more trusted members, maybe we can decrease the number of seconds.

isn't there going to be a new type of scratchers that don't have to wait long before posting in 2.0?

RedRocker227 · 2012-09-27 15:14:33

dvd4 wrote:
mythbusteranimator wrote:
We know that; we are saying that for the more trusted members, maybe we can decrease the number of seconds.
isn't there going to be a new type of scratchers that don't have to wait long before posting in 2.0?

Nothing's been confirmed yet

dvd4 · 2012-09-27 15:17:42

RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
mythbusteranimator wrote:
We know that; we are saying that for the more trusted members, maybe we can decrease the number of seconds.
isn't there going to be a new type of scratchers that don't have to wait long before posting in 2.0?
Nothing's been confirmed yet

But rumours can be true...

RedRocker227 · 2012-09-27 15:20:53

dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
isn't there going to be a new type of scratchers that don't have to wait long before posting in 2.0?
Nothing's been confirmed yet
But rumours can be true...

Well yeah, they can be, doesn't mean it isthough

If I started a rumour that 2.0 is cancelled because the Scratch Team can't be bothered to work on it anymore then that doesn't mean that'd be true

Last edited by RedRocker227 (2012-09-27 15:21:22)

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2012-09-21 22:32:37

Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#2 2012-09-21 22:35:35

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#3 2012-09-21 22:37:28

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#4 2012-09-21 22:38:13

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

funelephant wrote:

#5 2012-09-21 22:40:00

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#6 2012-09-24 01:51:58

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#7 2012-09-24 06:47:20

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

chongyian wrote:

#8 2012-09-24 13:18:34

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#9 2012-09-24 22:09:27

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#10 2012-09-25 02:34:34

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#11 2012-09-25 17:45:56

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

JH1010 wrote:

#12 2012-09-26 07:28:12

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#13 2012-09-26 10:31:58

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#14 2012-09-26 18:06:42

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#15 2012-09-26 18:15:22

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

KrIsMa wrote:

#16 2012-09-26 19:14:48

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

jukyter wrote:

KrIsMa wrote:

#17 2012-09-26 21:23:51

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

KrIsMa wrote:

jukyter wrote:

KrIsMa wrote:

#18 2012-09-26 21:30:23

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

dvd4 wrote:

KrIsMa wrote:

jukyter wrote:

#19 2012-09-27 10:49:33

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#20 2012-09-27 10:53:30

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#21 2012-09-27 10:55:49

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

#22 2012-09-27 15:08:57

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

mythbusteranimator wrote:

#23 2012-09-27 15:14:33

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

dvd4 wrote:

mythbusteranimator wrote:

#24 2012-09-27 15:17:42

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

RedRocker227 wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

mythbusteranimator wrote:

#25 2012-09-27 15:20:53

Re: Do we need the 60 / 180 second rule in between posting?

dvd4 wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

Board footer