Scratch

zammer990 · 2012-09-04 12:02:20

jji7skyline wrote:
bobbybee wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:

But 'pro' scratchers may get hacked.
But 'community' mods might get hacked as well. Actually, the mods are still bigger targets.
Yet they are a small portion of the community and are advised to have strong passwords.

Sp are all people, besides, "hacking" is just a hyped up word that means very little. A spammer isn't going to bother trying to passguess a mod on a relatively small site when most passwords are 7+ letters, and 40^7 is not easy to macro guess.

thebriculator · 2012-09-04 16:43:16

bobbybee wrote:
Maybe there is a formula (weighted average) that incorporates [everything] into a single number. The number has to be greater than x.

That's the method I agree with.

MrFlash67 wrote:
with manual upgrading

I agree with this.

benjamin2 wrote:
NO 60 SECOND RULE

and this too, but maybe 30 seconds.

So I support.

veggieman001 · 2012-09-04 16:47:14

I think that there should be some sort of rank like this (not so keen on the name) but that requires manual upgrading and is decided on a case-by-case basis, like with, for example, the Collab Counselors.

MrFlash67 · 2012-09-04 17:03:00

pizza22 wrote:
MrFlash67 wrote:
Could you put me in the supporters with my conditions?
Okay, we are changing the list,

Also, my case is meant to be MrFlash67, not mrflash67.

Wes64 · 2012-09-04 17:48:00

bobbybee wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
But 'pro' scratchers may get hacked.
But 'community' mods might get hacked as well. Actually, the mods are still bigger targets.

name one instance of someone being "hacked"

its never happened before, why should it now? besides, scratch has the most efficient moderation on any website of this size and purpose

Firedrake969 · 2012-09-04 19:47:33

Wes64 wrote:
bobbybee wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
But 'pro' scratchers may get hacked.
But 'community' mods might get hacked as well. Actually, the mods are still bigger targets.
name one instance of someone being "hacked"

its never happened before, why should it now? besides, scratch has the most efficient moderation on any website of this size and purpose

The only example is Kaj, and nothing happened. And besides, nothing is worth hacking here except maybe the MIT stuff.

funelephant · 2012-09-04 19:59:22

ImagineIt wrote:
I support all but the tutorial part. You can help out without doing that.

jji7skyline · 2012-09-04 21:17:14

Wes64 wrote:
bobbybee wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
But 'pro' scratchers may get hacked.
But 'community' mods might get hacked as well. Actually, the mods are still bigger targets.
name one instance of someone being "hacked"

its never happened before, why should it now? besides, scratch has the most efficient moderation on any website of this size and purpose

A TBG moderator got hacked once, and many valuable topics were lost.

Mokat · 2012-09-04 21:21:12

I support but maybe it should be called something like Trusted Scratcher or Senior Scratcher.

jji7skyline · 2012-09-04 21:28:00

Mokat wrote:
I support but maybe it should be called something like Trusted Scratcher or Senior Scratcher.

I like Über Scratcher :3

Mokat · 2012-09-04 21:33:29

jji7skyline wrote:
Mokat wrote:
I support but maybe it should be called something like Trusted Scratcher or Senior Scratcher.
I like Über Scratcher :3

c:

veggieman001 · 2012-09-04 23:01:19

Firedrake969 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
bobbybee wrote:

But 'community' mods might get hacked as well. Actually, the mods are still bigger targets.
name one instance of someone being "hacked"

its never happened before, why should it now? besides, scratch has the most efficient moderation on any website of this size and purpose
The only example is Kaj, and nothing happened. And besides, nothing is worth hacking here except maybe the MIT stuff.

How is Kaj significant? Many users have made claims/threats of hacking the site, and never done anything. I don't think Kaj is more important just because (s)he is more infamous.

jji7skyline · 2012-09-04 23:02:17

veggieman001 wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:

name one instance of someone being "hacked"

its never happened before, why should it now? besides, scratch has the most efficient moderation on any website of this size and purpose
The only example is Kaj, and nothing happened. And besides, nothing is worth hacking here except maybe the MIT stuff.
How is Kaj significant? Many users have made claims/threats of hacking the site, and never done anything. I don't think Kaj is more important just because (s)he is more infamous.

Kaj didn't actually hack scratch, she just threatened to take over scratch in a project.

veggieman001 · 2012-09-04 23:29:05

jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:

The only example is Kaj, and nothing happened. And besides, nothing is worth hacking here except maybe the MIT stuff.
How is Kaj significant? Many users have made claims/threats of hacking the site, and never done anything. I don't think Kaj is more important just because (s)he is more infamous.
Kaj didn't actually hack scratch, she just threatened to take over scratch in a project.

Yes, that's a great summary of my post.

zubblewu · 2012-09-04 23:30:25

veggieman001 wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:

How is Kaj significant? Many users have made claims/threats of hacking the site, and never done anything. I don't think Kaj is more important just because (s)he is more infamous.
Kaj didn't actually hack scratch, she just threatened to take over scratch in a project.
Yes, that's a great summary of my post.

Indeed. It brings tears to my eyes c';

jji7skyline · 2012-09-04 23:30:34

veggieman001 wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:

How is Kaj significant? Many users have made claims/threats of hacking the site, and never done anything. I don't think Kaj is more important just because (s)he is more infamous.
Kaj didn't actually hack scratch, she just threatened to take over scratch in a project.
Yes, that's a great summary of my post.

My post explains your post very well.

veggieman001 · 2012-09-04 23:33:12

jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:

Kaj didn't actually hack scratch, she just threatened to take over scratch in a project.
Yes, that's a great summary of my post.
My post explains your post very well.

I think all your posts are just summaries of my posts.

jji7skyline · 2012-09-04 23:36:50

veggieman001 wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:

Yes, that's a great summary of my post.
My post explains your post very well.
I think all your posts are just summaries of my posts.

Only when I feel like it.

zubblewu · 2012-09-04 23:46:21

jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:

My post explains your post very well.
I think all your posts are just summaries of my posts.
Only when I feel like it.

If I may, that makes no sense, considering all includes every post you've made, therefore you can't only sometimes summarize his posts. All or nothing. Make up your mind U_U

jji7skyline · 2012-09-04 23:50:33

zubblewu wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
I think all your posts are just summaries of my posts.
Only when I feel like it.
If I may, that makes no sense, considering all includes every post you've made, therefore you can't only sometimes summarize his posts. All or nothing. Make up your mind U_U

I meant, I only summarise his posts when I feel like it -.-

zubblewu · 2012-09-04 23:51:09

jji7skyline wrote:
zubblewu wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
Only when I feel like it.
If I may, that makes no sense, considering all includes every post you've made, therefore you can't only sometimes summarize his posts. All or nothing. Make up your mind U_U
I meant, I only summarise his posts when I feel like it -.-

I know. I just like messing with people tongue

Last edited by zubblewu (2012-09-04 23:51:48)

veggieman001 · 2012-09-04 23:52:14

I don't really think summaries of my posts are strictly necessary; one should be able to look past the thick layers of hostility and sarcasm to find the dreary underlying message of hopelessness.

jji7skyline · 2012-09-04 23:52:44

Not everyone can always understand what you are saying.

zubblewu · 2012-09-04 23:54:52

veggieman001 wrote:
I don't really think summaries of my posts are strictly necessary; one should be able to look past the thick layers of hostility and sarcasm to find the dreary underlying message of hopelessness.

Indeed, not all individuals are capable of such great feats sadly. 'Tis a darn shame, though.

jji7skyline · 2012-09-04 23:58:46

Zubble, now you're summarising my posts tongue

Scratch

archived forums

#26 2012-09-04 12:02:20

Re: Pro Scratchers

jji7skyline wrote:

bobbybee wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

#27 2012-09-04 16:43:16

Re: Pro Scratchers

bobbybee wrote:

MrFlash67 wrote:

benjamin2 wrote:

#28 2012-09-04 16:47:14

Re: Pro Scratchers

#29 2012-09-04 17:03:00

Re: Pro Scratchers

pizza22 wrote:

MrFlash67 wrote:

#30 2012-09-04 17:48:00

Re: Pro Scratchers

bobbybee wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

#31 2012-09-04 19:47:33

Re: Pro Scratchers

Wes64 wrote:

bobbybee wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

#32 2012-09-04 19:59:22

Re: Pro Scratchers

ImagineIt wrote:

#33 2012-09-04 21:17:14

Re: Pro Scratchers

Wes64 wrote:

bobbybee wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

#34 2012-09-04 21:21:12

Re: Pro Scratchers

#35 2012-09-04 21:28:00

Re: Pro Scratchers

Mokat wrote:

#36 2012-09-04 21:33:29

Re: Pro Scratchers

jji7skyline wrote:

Mokat wrote:

#37 2012-09-04 23:01:19

Re: Pro Scratchers

Firedrake969 wrote:

Wes64 wrote:

bobbybee wrote:

#38 2012-09-04 23:02:17

Re: Pro Scratchers

veggieman001 wrote:

Firedrake969 wrote:

Wes64 wrote:

#39 2012-09-04 23:29:05

Re: Pro Scratchers

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

Firedrake969 wrote:

#40 2012-09-04 23:30:25

Re: Pro Scratchers

veggieman001 wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

#41 2012-09-04 23:30:34

Re: Pro Scratchers

veggieman001 wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

#42 2012-09-04 23:33:12

Re: Pro Scratchers

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

#43 2012-09-04 23:36:50

Re: Pro Scratchers

veggieman001 wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

#44 2012-09-04 23:46:21