I bet that there are a lot of old accounts on scratch that will never be used again.
After a lot of discussion, I improved my idea a bit:
A few weeks before Scratch 2.0 + Website are released, there could be a special notification or something that all Scratch accounts with no (/few comentless) projects that have been inactive for a while will be deleted. Though if great Scratchers are inactive but have projects that kind of belong to Scratch's history, they will ofc stay. You can say "No!" if your account might be in danger (because of few projects or views) and noone will delete you!
Why do so?
It saves some space on the server (not much, maybe) and makes it a bit faster and more efficient.
It makes a lot of user-names avaiable again.
The statistics will change and therefore be up-to-date and right again (whats the point of statistics if they involve people that are not scratchers any more?)
It's just tidier and it shrinks the community to those who are still Scratchers and not a bunch of inactives as well.
Please comment and tell me what you think about this.
Last edited by xJira (2012-09-05 15:23:05)
Offline
i dont support, all user data should be permanent even if the account is no longer being used. we could lose some pretty revolutionary projects and history
Offline
Wes64 wrote:
i dont support, all user data should be permanent even if the account is no longer being used. we could lose some pretty revolutionary projects and history
Offline
No.
Instead, just remove all multiple-month old projectless and commentless users.
Offline
OverPowered wrote:
No.
Instead, just remove all multiple-month old projectless and commentless users.
i also dont support this.
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
i dont support, all user data should be permanent even if the account is no longer being used. we could lose some pretty revolutionary projects and history
Offline
Wes64 wrote:
i dont support, all user data should be permanent even if the account is no longer being used. we could lose some pretty revolutionary projects and history
Uh, ofc I didn't think about that... Well, maybe they should leave these accounts, but some that were never used might as well be deleted
joingmy00 wrote:
Some people just register to download projects...
But they could keep their accounts if they just click the "Stay"-Button...
Offline
An active scratchemay go on a holiday for 3 weeks. And as stated above, there is too much to lose. Sorry, but I don't support.
Offline
xJira wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
i dont support, all user data should be permanent even if the account is no longer being used. we could lose some pretty revolutionary projects and history
Uh, ofc I didn't think about that... Well, maybe they should leave these accounts, but some that were never used might as well be deleted
joingmy00 wrote:
Some people just register to download projects...
But they could keep their accounts if they just click the "Stay"-Button...
What if they had an account an went inactive for a period of time, and came back only to find their accounts gone?
Offline
jontmy00 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
This should only apply to users with no projects, comments, or forum posts.
Some people just register to download projects...
And if they have no projects, comments, or forums posts, how would it matter to them if their account was deleted? They can very simply create a new one and all would be well...
Offline
OverPowered wrote:
jontmy00 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
This should only apply to users with no projects, comments, or forum posts.
Some people just register to download projects...
And if they have no projects, comments, or forums posts, how would it matter to them if their account was deleted? They can very simply create a new one and all would be well...
Then they can't use the same username and password.
Offline
jontmy00 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
This should only apply to users with no projects, comments, or forum posts.
Some people just register to download projects...
You can do that by appending /downloadsb to the url: ex.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Molybdenum/2757424
|
V
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Molybde … downloadsb
Offline
Molybdenum wrote:
jontmy00 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
This should only apply to users with no projects, comments, or forum posts.
Some people just register to download projects...
You can do that by appending /downloadsb to the url: ex.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Molybdenum/2757424
|
V
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Molybde … downloadsb
not all people know that
Offline
777w wrote:
Molybdenum wrote:
jontmy00 wrote:
Some people just register to download projects...You can do that by appending /downloadsb to the url: ex.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Molybdenum/2757424
|
V
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Molybde … downloadsbnot all people know that
+1.
Offline
777w wrote:
Molybdenum wrote:
jontmy00 wrote:
Some people just register to download projects...You can do that by appending /downloadsb to the url: ex.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Molybdenum/2757424
|
V
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Molybde … downloadsbnot all people know that
Teach them.
Offline
OverPowered wrote:
And if they have no projects, comments, or forums posts, how would it matter to them if their account was deleted?
if someone has no job, no friends, and no social interaction, should we kill them?
no.
so if a scratcher has no projects, no comments, and no forum posts, does that make them worthless?
no.
so should we remove their stuff?
no.
Offline