I support, I think it should be like
change [x v] stretch by [10]and the same for setting stretch though, so you can adjust the x and y stretch separately.
Last edited by RedRocker227 (2012-08-07 14:44:30)
Offline
support
Offline
This will highly promote 3D engines. Support. Including a Taper Block would be nice, as it would allow FULL textured 3D.
Offline
Support! :3
This would be easy to implement into Scratch 2.0 before release.
Offline
soniku3 wrote:
Mokat wrote:
Support. I don't know why they were even removed.
Basically, I agree with everyone above.
Offline
complex wrote:
This will highly promote 3D engines. Support. Including a Taper Block would be nice, as it would allow FULL textured 3D.
You could still do it with only the stretch block...in a highly convoluted way.
Offline
Support. I added these blocks in once upon a time but forgot to save
The image and Ive been too lazy since. Oh well I must say these are some of my favorite blocks XD
Offline
A stretch block would be very useful for making 3D games. I support.
Offline
+1
Offline
BirdByte wrote:
Maybe they could have deform effects (taper, twist, bend, stretch, etc.) in the "change [] effect by ()" and "set [] effect to ()" blocks?
Offline
scimonster wrote:
BirdByte wrote:
Maybe they could have deform effects (taper, twist, bend, stretch, etc.) in the "change [] effect by ()" and "set [] effect to ()" blocks?
+999999999999999......9
Offline