What's the best file type to use for images when you convert them from .Psd to something Scratch can use? I've had problems with JPGs when the project is uploaded and want to know what the best kind is to use.
Offline
.bmp and .png are the same except .bmp is larger and .png supports transparency.
Offline
Here's my opinion:
GIF's are huge files compared to the others, so only use them if you want animated pictures.
PNGs are rather good quality for their size, so they are my pick.
JPEGs can have lots of compression, but lose quality in the process.
I personally wouldn't use any other types of images (excluding vector images) on the web just because not all browsers will support them
Last edited by SJRCS_011 (2012-07-30 21:52:42)
Offline
Scratch only sees transparency if it's 1-bit, and it's in GIF format, so GIF get's my vote.
Offline
Personally, I like .bmp because I enjoy the discolored, gritty look your pictures obtain when converted to it.
Really, though, I think .png is the way to go.
Offline
Genesix wrote:
Doesn't .bmp have less compression and quality loss? The only problem I've had with those is that the colors change slightly.
*ahem*
.PNGs are lossless, meaning that no quality is lost. BMPs have NO compression whatsoever so the file size is MASSIVE. BMPs are also restricted to 16bpp -- no transparency support. PNGs, however, do not have this restriction, and support 32bpp images -- transparency and semi-transparency -- therefore making it the best image format available. Let's compare it to GIF:
GIF PNG
Animation: Animation No animation
Depth: 24bpp 32bpp
File size: Medium Small
Support: 100% IE has some issues
GIF is quite a competitor, but if you're going for quality, go for PNG.
Offline
Genesix wrote:
Yeah, GIF loses too much quality and doesn't display all colors correctly so I'll go with PNG
well, GIFs don't really lose quality, they just have massive filesizes if the image is good quality
Offline
SJRCS_011 wrote:
Genesix wrote:
Yeah, GIF loses too much quality and doesn't display all colors correctly so I'll go with PNG
well, GIFs don't really lose quality, they just have massive filesizes if the image is good quality
No, GIFs only support 256 colours so it does lose quality.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
SJRCS_011 wrote:
Genesix wrote:
Yeah, GIF loses too much quality and doesn't display all colors correctly so I'll go with PNG
well, GIFs don't really lose quality, they just have massive filesizes if the image is good quality
No, GIFs only support 256 colours so it does lose quality.
Ehm ehm! 256 colours would mean 8-bit pictures... that's how many colours pre-millennium computers could support!
GIFs I believe have true colour support in their palette, with only 256 (yes) colours per frame.
Offline
roijac wrote:
i like svgs
edit:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … h_ball.png
animated png guys...
It isn't moving for me.
Offline
nama wrote:
roijac wrote:
i like svgs
edit:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … h_ball.png
animated png guys...It isn't moving for me.
Me neither. Maybe some browsers/OSes don't support it.
Offline
LS97 wrote:
nama wrote:
roijac wrote:
i like svgs
edit:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … h_ball.png
animated png guys...It isn't moving for me.
Me neither. Maybe some browsers/OSes don't support it.
It's moving now. I was using chrome earlier- now I'm in firefox.
Must be a browser thing,
Offline
nama wrote:
LS97 wrote:
nama wrote:
It isn't moving for me.
Me neither. Maybe some browsers/OSes don't support it.
It's moving now. I was using chrome earlier- now I'm in firefox.
Must be a browser thing,
Yep. I did some research and "GIF intrinsically supports animated images. PNG supports animation only via unofficial extensions."
Furthermore, "Mozilla's unofficial APNG format is a potential solution"
So it makes sense
Last edited by LS97 (2012-08-01 17:07:06)
Offline
LS97 wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
SJRCS_011 wrote:
well, GIFs don't really lose quality, they just have massive filesizes if the image is good qualityNo, GIFs only support 256 colours so it does lose quality.
Ehm ehm! 256 colours would mean 8-bit pictures... that's how many colours pre-millennium computers could support!
GIFs I believe have true colour support in their palette, with only 256 (yes) colours per frame.
Yeah, they're 8-bit pictures. 256 colours per frame.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
LS97 wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
No, GIFs only support 256 colours so it does lose quality.Ehm ehm! 256 colours would mean 8-bit pictures... that's how many colours pre-millennium computers could support!
GIFs I believe have true colour support in their palette, with only 256 (yes) colours per frame.Yeah, they're 8-bit pictures. 256 colours per frame.
regardless, pngs are the best, right veggie?
Offline