Scratch

XenoK · 2012-05-27 15:53:18

^^

jvvg · 2012-05-27 15:57:51

Since it appears the whole thing will be made in Flash, I doubt it.

stevetheipad · 2012-05-27 15:59:03

Nope, only Flash player.

RedRocker227 · 2012-05-27 16:08:50

Why would they? The Java player sucks, they're not gonna want to do even more work on something nobody will use. tongue

XenoK · 2012-05-27 16:14:24

RedRocker227 wrote:
Why would they? The Java player sucks, they're not gonna want to do even more work on something nobody will use.

I would use it! I'm going to uninstall flash on my computer shortly.

XenoK · 2012-05-27 16:16:29

RedRocker227 wrote:
Why would they? The Java player sucks, they're not gonna want to do even more work on something nobody will use.

tell me, when had you last used the java player? They've done some upgrading on it. It's a lot faster than it used to be. It glitches way less than the flash player does as well. And every five minutes, the flash player crashes. It also takes a good five minutes to load. The flash player sucks, thank you very much.

RedRocker227 · 2012-05-27 16:17:00

XenoK wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Why would they? The Java player sucks, they're not gonna want to do even more work on something nobody will use.
I would use it! I'm going to uninstall flash on my computer shortly.

Oh yeah, were you the one who made the thread about protesting against Flash?

Well, in that case you may as well quit Scratch, because you won't be able to do anything without Flash (apart from the forums).

777w · 2012-05-27 16:47:50

XenoK wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Why would they? The Java player sucks, they're not gonna want to do even more work on something nobody will use.
tell me, when had you last used the java player? They've done some upgrading on it. It's a lot faster than it used to be. It glitches way less than the flash player does as well. And every five minutes, the flash player crashes. It also takes a good five minutes to load. The flash player sucks, thank you very much.

flash works perfectly fine for me

XenoK · 2012-05-27 17:45:43

777w wrote:
XenoK wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Why would they? The Java player sucks, they're not gonna want to do even more work on something nobody will use.
tell me, when had you last used the java player? They've done some upgrading on it. It's a lot faster than it used to be. It glitches way less than the flash player does as well. And every five minutes, the flash player crashes. It also takes a good five minutes to load. The flash player sucks, thank you very much.
flash works perfectly fine for me

I use Firefox on Linux 12.04. Accessibility, one of the pillars of web design, is pretty low here.

Harakou · 2012-05-27 18:10:09

XenoK wrote:
777w wrote:
XenoK wrote:

tell me, when had you last used the java player? They've done some upgrading on it. It's a lot faster than it used to be. It glitches way less than the flash player does as well. And every five minutes, the flash player crashes. It also takes a good five minutes to load. The flash player sucks, thank you very much.
flash works perfectly fine for me
I use Firefox on Linux 12.04. Accessibility, one of the pillars of web design, is pretty low here.

I think you'll find that the Flash player will work significantly better when projects are both made and viewed in the same application both offline and online. That's one of the advantages of the move to Flash. smile

I also hope that saying you have "Linux 12.04" was a simple slip-up. tongue

XenoK · 2012-05-27 20:45:30

Harakou wrote:
XenoK wrote:
777w wrote:

flash works perfectly fine for me
I use Firefox on Linux 12.04. Accessibility, one of the pillars of web design, is pretty low here.
I think you'll find that the Flash player will work significantly better when projects are both made and viewed in the same application both offline and online. That's one of the advantages of the move to Flash.

I also hope that saying you have "Linux 12.04" was a simple slip-up.

Yes, it was. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS is what I meant.

ImagineIt · 2012-05-27 20:53:20

777w wrote:
XenoK wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Why would they? The Java player sucks, they're not gonna want to do even more work on something nobody will use.
tell me, when had you last used the java player? They've done some upgrading on it. It's a lot faster than it used to be. It glitches way less than the flash player does as well. And every five minutes, the flash player crashes. It also takes a good five minutes to load. The flash player sucks, thank you very much.
flash works perfectly fine for me

veggieman001 · 2012-05-27 20:55:07

XenoK wrote:
Harakou wrote:
XenoK wrote:

I use Firefox on Linux 12.04. Accessibility, one of the pillars of web design, is pretty low here.
I think you'll find that the Flash player will work significantly better when projects are both made and viewed in the same application both offline and online. That's one of the advantages of the move to Flash.

I also hope that saying you have "Linux 12.04" was a simple slip-up.
Yes, it was. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS is what I meant.

I've had issues with Flash on Ubuntu, although I don't know why. 32 or 64-bit?

ftf841 · 2012-05-27 21:06:15

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/ftf841/2537264 java toataly messed up this project it works in flash though

ftf841 · 2012-05-27 21:08:01

java crashes on 64-bit browsers

XenoK · 2012-05-27 22:16:12

Just want the current java player to be accessible via embed until an html5 player comes.

Mokat · 2012-05-27 22:53:41

No because everything will be in Flash.

veggieman001 · 2012-05-27 22:57:39

ftf841 wrote:
java crashes on 64-bit browsers

I've never had problems with it on a 64-bit machine. Maybe you've only had the 32-bit version of Java?

XenoK · 2012-05-28 07:39:43

veggieman001 wrote:
XenoK wrote:
Harakou wrote:

I think you'll find that the Flash player will work significantly better when projects are both made and viewed in the same application both offline and online. That's one of the advantages of the move to Flash.

I also hope that saying you have "Linux 12.04" was a simple slip-up.
Yes, it was. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS is what I meant.
I've had issues with Flash on Ubuntu, although I don't know why. 32 or 64-bit?

32-bit. My dell inspiron mini isnt a very supporting 64-bit. Its 32

XenoK · 2012-05-28 07:41:58

veggieman001 wrote:
ftf841 wrote:
java crashes on 64-bit browsers
I've never had problems with it on a 64-bit machine. Maybe you've only had the 32-bit version of Java?

Yeah, i went to this one programming camp last year. They had java on 64-bit computers, and it was faster than ever.

ftf841 · 2012-05-28 07:43:55

XenoK wrote:
777w wrote:
XenoK wrote:

tell me, when had you last used the java player? They've done some upgrading on it. It's a lot faster than it used to be. It glitches way less than the flash player does as well. And every five minutes, the flash player crashes. It also takes a good five minutes to load. The flash player sucks, thank you very much.
flash works perfectly fine for me
I use Firefox on Linux 12.04. Accessibility, one of the pillars of web design, is pretty low here.

how old is your computer?

XenoK · 2012-05-28 13:01:12

ftf841 wrote:
XenoK wrote:
777w wrote:

flash works perfectly fine for me
I use Firefox on Linux 12.04. Accessibility, one of the pillars of web design, is pretty low here.
how old is your computer?

I think it is 2-3 years old.

scimonster · 2012-05-28 13:52:46

You can download the current Java player to use.

lallaway12 · 2012-05-28 14:14:15

scimonster wrote:
You can download the current Java player to use.

How as I am 2

conbot · 2012-06-08 10:41:37

XenoK wrote:
777w wrote:
XenoK wrote:

tell me, when had you last used the java player? They've done some upgrading on it. It's a lot faster than it used to be. It glitches way less than the flash player does as well. And every five minutes, the flash player crashes. It also takes a good five minutes to load. The flash player sucks, thank you very much.
flash works perfectly fine for me
I use Firefox on Linux 12.04. Accessibility, one of the pillars of web design, is pretty low here.

Linux 12.04? Wow, I thought the Linux kernel version was still 3.2.

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2012-05-27 15:53:18

Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

#2 2012-05-27 15:57:51

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

#3 2012-05-27 15:59:03

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

#4 2012-05-27 16:08:50

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

#5 2012-05-27 16:14:24

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

RedRocker227 wrote:

#6 2012-05-27 16:16:29

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

RedRocker227 wrote:

#7 2012-05-27 16:17:00

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

XenoK wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

#8 2012-05-27 16:47:50

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

XenoK wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

#9 2012-05-27 17:45:43

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

777w wrote:

XenoK wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

#10 2012-05-27 18:10:09

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

XenoK wrote:

777w wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#11 2012-05-27 20:45:30

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

Harakou wrote:

XenoK wrote:

777w wrote:

#12 2012-05-27 20:53:20

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

777w wrote:

XenoK wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

#13 2012-05-27 20:55:07

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

XenoK wrote:

Harakou wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#14 2012-05-27 21:06:15

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

#15 2012-05-27 21:08:01

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

#16 2012-05-27 22:16:12

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

#17 2012-05-27 22:53:41

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

#18 2012-05-27 22:57:39

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

ftf841 wrote:

#19 2012-05-28 07:39:43

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

veggieman001 wrote:

XenoK wrote:

Harakou wrote:

#20 2012-05-28 07:41:58

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

veggieman001 wrote:

ftf841 wrote:

#21 2012-05-28 07:43:55

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

XenoK wrote:

777w wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#22 2012-05-28 13:01:12

Re: Will Scratch 2.0 have a java player?

ftf841 wrote:

XenoK wrote:

777w wrote:

#23 2012-05-28 13:52:46