This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#401 2012-03-31 22:08:56

LiquidMetal
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-06-15
Posts: 500+

Re: Image tags disabled

Paddle2See wrote:

Because of some recent abuses of the embedded image feature (the [img] tag),  we have disabled it on our forums.  We regret the inconvenience but feel that it's the best thing to do given the circumstances.  If an image is necessary for a forum discussion, we suggest that you upload it in a Scratch project and link to the project from your forum post.

Why not have images await mod approval before display?

Offline

 

#402 2012-03-31 22:22:30

Mokat
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-12-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: Image tags disabled

LiquidMetal wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

Because of some recent abuses of the embedded image feature (the [img] tag),  we have disabled it on our forums.  We regret the inconvenience but feel that it's the best thing to do given the circumstances.  If an image is necessary for a forum discussion, we suggest that you upload it in a Scratch project and link to the project from your forum post.

Why not have images await mod approval before display?

Way too much work for the (already overworked) moderators.


http://www.eggcave.com/egg/977371.pnghttp://www.eggcave.com/egg/977376.pnghttp://www.eggcave.com/egg/1005291.pnghttp://www.eggcave.com/egg/996745.png

Offline

 

#403 2012-04-01 14:29:01

scimonster
Community Moderator
Registered: 2010-06-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: Image tags disabled

funelephant wrote:

scimonster wrote:

Unite wrote:

I think this descision is good for the community, however there are some disadvanages too. Here is what Ive collected from some posts before:

Pros:
Pages Load faster
No more spam
No more confusion between pic and sig ( some people will just think it is signature and pass it )

Cons:
Less colorful/beautiful ( besides the fact that sratch blocks and Signatures are still going


So in the final debate, I think that disableing the IMG tag is fair way of telling us not to spam in images, here or on scratch. However I believe that there may be some ways to rehandle it:

Make it so that only full scratchers could use the IMG tags
                                             OR
Watch the current activeness of spam and see if the rates go up or down over the past month year ect. If they go up then wait abit longer, i they go down allow the IMG tags until some massive spam or other comes from it.
                                              OR
Have the moderators veiw it first before it can be veiwed, but make sure the moderators are doing their job almost every day.

I think that these type of descisions in scratch are completely okay to debate about and if you do not like one of my ideas please feel free to tell me why you think it wont work, but just one please.
                    From Unite

Before this, only full Scratchers could use the IMG tag.
The last one is rather impossible, as the Scratch moderator team is few, and they're just volunteers.

It could take forever to get all of them approved!

There's a bot on the Scratch site that does it every night.  wink

Mokat wrote:

LiquidMetal wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

Because of some recent abuses of the embedded image feature (the [img] tag),  we have disabled it on our forums.  We regret the inconvenience but feel that it's the best thing to do given the circumstances.  If an image is necessary for a forum discussion, we suggest that you upload it in a Scratch project and link to the project from your forum post.

Why not have images await mod approval before display?

Way too much work for the (already overworked) moderators.

Yep. People forget that our mods are volunteers, who prefer not to spend all their time approving images.

Offline

 

#404 2012-04-01 18:57:04

Mokat
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-12-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: Image tags disabled

scimonster wrote:

funelephant wrote:

scimonster wrote:

Unite wrote:

I think this descision is good for the community, however there are some disadvanages too. Here is what Ive collected from some posts before:

Pros:
Pages Load faster
No more spam
No more confusion between pic and sig ( some people will just think it is signature and pass it )

Cons:
Less colorful/beautiful ( besides the fact that sratch blocks and Signatures are still going


So in the final debate, I think that disableing the IMG tag is fair way of telling us not to spam in images, here or on scratch. However I believe that there may be some ways to rehandle it:

Make it so that only full scratchers could use the IMG tags
                                             OR
Watch the current activeness of spam and see if the rates go up or down over the past month year ect. If they go up then wait abit longer, i they go down allow the IMG tags until some massive spam or other comes from it.
                                              OR
Have the moderators veiw it first before it can be veiwed, but make sure the moderators are doing their job almost every day.

I think that these type of descisions in scratch are completely okay to debate about and if you do not like one of my ideas please feel free to tell me why you think it wont work, but just one please.
                    From Unite

Before this, only full Scratchers could use the IMG tag.
The last one is rather impossible, as the Scratch moderator team is few, and they're just volunteers.

It could take forever to get all of them approved!

There's a bot on the Scratch site that does it every night.  wink

Mokat wrote:

LiquidMetal wrote:


Why not have images await mod approval before display?

Way too much work for the (already overworked) moderators.

Yep. People forget that our mods are volunteers, who prefer not to spend all their time approving images.

If they [the mods] spend all their time approving images, then people would troll all over the place (without images)


http://www.eggcave.com/egg/977371.pnghttp://www.eggcave.com/egg/977376.pnghttp://www.eggcave.com/egg/1005291.pnghttp://www.eggcave.com/egg/996745.png

Offline

 

#405 2012-04-05 00:18:44

zippynk
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-07-23
Posts: 500+

Re: Image tags disabled

Wait... I saw this post about whitelisted sites...

What's this about?


https://dl.dropbox.com/u/60598636/trifocal_interlude_soundcloud_button.png

Offline

 

#406 2012-04-05 04:45:24

RedRocker227
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-10-26
Posts: 1000+

Re: Image tags disabled

zippynk wrote:

Wait... I saw this post about whitelisted sites...

What's this about?

My post :'3

See this post by Lightnin.


Why

Offline

 

#407 2012-04-10 19:34:45

ihaveamac
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-09-22
Posts: 1000+

Re: Image tags disabled

Can we ask for certain sites for some users to be allowed, or some directories of sites? I use dropbox to host most of my images which would be http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11485779/file-name-or-directory. 11485779 means it's my public folder, and only I manage it.


~ihaveamac - visit ihaveamac.net

Offline

 

#408 2012-04-13 17:17:13

Mokat
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-12-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: Image tags disabled

They're back now, so I suppose this can be closed.


http://www.eggcave.com/egg/977371.pnghttp://www.eggcave.com/egg/977376.pnghttp://www.eggcave.com/egg/1005291.pnghttp://www.eggcave.com/egg/996745.png

Offline

 

#409 2012-04-16 15:46:37

Bklecka
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-08-27
Posts: 1000+

Re: Image tags disabled

yep


http://i48.tinypic.com/106ijc9.jpg

Offline

 

#410 2012-04-16 18:04:28

Paddle2See
Scratch Team
Registered: 2007-10-27
Posts: 1000+

Re: Image tags disabled

Images are back on  smile


http://i39.tinypic.com/2nav6o7.gif

Offline

 

Board footer