Scratch
archived forums
#101 2012-04-12 18:51:20
- agscratcher
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-09
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
GLaDOS2 wrote:
wolvesstar97 wrote:
agscratcher wrote:
Exactly. Anything can be unobtainium. It could do anything as well. Therefore, our time travel/FTL/whatever theories could be proven.
Onto the actual thread, I have a new discussion point: parapsychology.BUT WE'RE NOT DONE WITH TIME!!
But parapsycology is cool too.
Thats like out-of-body experiences and telepathy, right?Yes.
I know someone who's had OOOBEs and instead could feel from the consciousness of animals. She knows what it's like to die, because once she had one in a squirrel that got hit by a truck. O_O
Considering your friend has these weird visions/experiences, don't you think he/she could be the protagonist of Final Destination 6?
EDIT: Page 5 get
Last edited by agscratcher (2012-04-12 18:56:42)
Offline
#102 2012-04-12 19:53:00
- agscratcher
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-09
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
I hate to bump twice in a single day, but okay.
Offline
#103 2012-04-12 19:56:18
#104 2012-04-12 20:01:56
Re: Theoretical Physics
echs wrote:
Rather than discussing such a cliche topic, why don't we move into a new one.
This will probably be a bit too hard for most of you, but hear me out.
Swamplands.
Landscapes?
Last edited by trinary (2012-04-12 20:02:50)
Offline
#105 2012-04-12 20:04:56
Re: Theoretical Physics
trinary wrote:
echs wrote:
Rather than discussing such a cliche topic, why don't we move into a new one.
This will probably be a bit too hard for most of you, but hear me out.
Swamplands.Landscapes?
A swampland is the opposite of a landscape.
Offline
#106 2012-04-12 20:07:50
Re: Theoretical Physics
echs wrote:
trinary wrote:
echs wrote:
Rather than discussing such a cliche topic, why don't we move into a new one.
This will probably be a bit too hard for most of you, but hear me out.
Swamplands.Landscapes?
A swampland is the opposite of a landscape.
Do continue.
Offline
#107 2012-04-12 20:11:05
Re: Theoretical Physics
trinary wrote:
echs wrote:
trinary wrote:
Landscapes?A swampland is the opposite of a landscape.
Do continue.
I did not mean for swamplands to become the aspect of the discussion, but to base theories around the concept of a swampland. I might have worded that a bit too vaguely.
Offline
#108 2012-04-13 06:49:09
#109 2012-04-13 15:18:26
#110 2012-04-13 15:45:41
#111 2012-04-14 23:15:41
- stevetheipad
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-08-06
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
This is like the awesomest topic ever. 
gone
Offline
#112 2012-04-15 00:30:44
- TorbyFork234
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-03-01
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
Is parapsycology also seeing the future in your dreams?
Offline
#113 2012-04-15 07:35:45
#114 2012-04-15 12:48:11
- wolvesstar97
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-08-31
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
I will not be able to participate in this for a bit, as I just saw Back to the Future, so all of my theories will involve a flux capacitor. 
Offline
#115 2012-04-15 12:59:42
- MoreGamesNow
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-10-12
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
wolvesstar97 wrote:
I will not be able to participate in this for a bit, as I just saw Back to the Future, so all of my theories will involve a flux capacitor.
"Cogito ergo sum" -- I think, therefore I am
Offline
#116 2012-04-15 13:00:44
- wolvesstar97
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-08-31
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
stevetheipad wrote:
This is like the awesomest topic ever.
Why thank you!
This also is made awesome by all the awesome people who participate!
Offline
#117 2012-04-15 13:04:59
- TorbyFork234
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-03-01
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
Spy-TF2 wrote:
TorbyFork234 wrote:
Is parapsycology also seeing the future in your dreams?
Actually, yes, I believe so. :1
More to discuss, I guess.
Then how does it work?
Offline
#118 2012-04-15 13:22:28
- wolvesstar97
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-08-31
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
Okay... just watched Imaginging the 10th Dimmension again. Now I can discuss.
And TobyFork, did you know that your signature is a 2-D rendering of a 3-D shadow of an object in the 4th dimmension?
Offline
#119 2012-04-15 13:28:51
- samtwheels
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-03-20
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
wolvesstar97 wrote:
Okay... just watched Imaginging the 10th Dimmension again. Now I can discuss.
And TobyFork, did you know that your signature is a 2-D rendering of a 3-D shadow of an object in the 4th dimmension?
It's a tesseract, right? A 4D hypercube?
Offline
#120 2012-04-15 13:42:43
- TorbyFork234
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-03-01
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
wolvesstar97 wrote:
Okay... just watched Imaginging the 10th Dimmension again. Now I can discuss.
And TobyFork, did you know that your signature is a 2-D rendering of a 3-D shadow of an object in the 4th dimmension?
You believe every show you watch about science? Some of those shows are just crazy, it's like saying everything on the history channel is true even though they have Ancient Aliens on 3 hours a day(not joking, it's like that).
Offline
#121 2012-04-15 16:05:41
#122 2012-04-15 16:20:55
- wolvesstar97
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-08-31
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
TorbyFork234 wrote:
wolvesstar97 wrote:
Okay... just watched Imaginging the 10th Dimmension again. Now I can discuss.
And TobyFork, did you know that your signature is a 2-D rendering of a 3-D shadow of an object in the 4th dimmension?You believe every show you watch about science? Some of those shows are just crazy, it's like saying everything on the history channel is true even though they have Ancient Aliens on 3 hours a day(not joking, it's like that).
No, watching it just restored my sanity. Also, it's a theory, NOT a TV show. The link is in the topic post.
Offline
#123 2012-04-16 15:58:47
#124 2012-04-16 16:23:49
#125 2012-04-16 16:33:44
- wolvesstar97
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-08-31
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Theoretical Physics
agscratcher wrote:
Alright, let's discuss...white holes.
YYYYYEEESSSS!!!!!!!! THANK YOU!
I've been wanting to introduce that topic. But you beat me to it.
Offline