Scratch

kayybee · 2011-12-30 19:53:37

Servine wrote:
could the mods allow the following img...

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/41073707/get_antidote.png

Mods cannot allow a certain image, sorry.

Also, for joefarebrother's idea, it's great, but the mods already have too much to do that it wouldn't work out...

fg123 · 2011-12-30 19:57:35

Perhaps only Scratchers can post images, not New Scratchers?

cheddargirl · 2011-12-30 20:03:38

fg123 wrote:
Perhaps only Scratchers can post images, not New Scratchers?

New Scratchers already have that limitation, we're talking about regular Scratcher accounts this time. hmm

fg123 · 2011-12-30 20:10:00

cheddargirl wrote:
fg123 wrote:
Perhaps only Scratchers can post images, not New Scratchers?
New Scratchers already have that limitation, we're talking about regular Scratcher accounts this time.

Oh man! yikes

I'm out of ideas...

Add another rank?

midnightleopard · 2011-12-30 20:12:03

Pure injustice.
Oh well, like the youtube repeat fiasco, time to make a new chrome extension.

Mokat · 2011-12-30 20:55:05

I guess that it's not really a concern for me, since I'm a New Scratcher and can't post images anyway. EDIT: Not anymore! xP
But couldn't people just post a link to pictures?

Last edited by Mokat (2012-02-23 19:46:20)

Chrischb · 2011-12-30 21:09:34

fg123 wrote:
cheddargirl wrote:
fg123 wrote:
Perhaps only Scratchers can post images, not New Scratchers?
New Scratchers already have that limitation, we're talking about regular Scratcher accounts this time.
Oh man!

I'm out of ideas...

Add another rank?

The current New Scratcher/Scratcher thing is bad enough to lots of people though tongue

mattb777 · 2011-12-30 22:29:45

Do past posts have the images taken out?

mattb777 · 2011-12-30 22:41:32

I got a genius idea. How about a user is limited to one image every 24 hours?

kayybee · 2011-12-31 00:07:26

mattb777 wrote:
Do past posts have the images taken out?

Yes. They appear as bbcode.

jji7skyline · 2011-12-31 00:43:23

Seems like a really bad way to end the year neutral

Good bye good days :'(

mattb777 · 2011-12-31 00:52:51

mattb777 wrote:
I got a genius idea. How about a user is limited to one image every 24 hours?

fg123 · 2011-12-31 01:36:56

It's back in! smile

TVflea · 2011-12-31 02:30:39

fg123 wrote:
It's back in!

*ahem*

mattb777 · 2011-12-31 02:44:25

mattb777 wrote:
I got a genius idea. How about a user is limited to one image every 24 hours?

Reposting...

PlutoIsHades · 2011-12-31 08:29:32

You guys are seriously overreacting. Hundreds of us are being punished for something we took absolutely no part in! mad

You guys always tell us not to feed the trolls. But right now, you're overreacting to the troll, which means you're feeding the trolls.

This was a horrible decision on your part.

midnightleopard · 2011-12-31 10:17:43

PlutoIsHades wrote:
You guys are seriously overreacting. Hundreds of us are being punished for something we took absolutely no part in!

You guys always tell us not to feed the trolls. But right now, you're overreacting to the troll, which means you're feeding the trolls.

This was a horrible decision on your part.

coolstuff · 2011-12-31 10:36:22

PlutoIsHades wrote:
You guys are seriously overreacting. Hundreds of us are being punished for something we took absolutely no part in!

You guys always tell us not to feed the trolls. But right now, you're overreacting to the troll, which means you're feeding the trolls.

This was a horrible decision on your part.

This is not a punishment; it's a precaution. We understand that none of you had anything to do with the attacks and it was an outsider troll (though it could be one of the people who have trolled our forums before). And while it would be all well and good to keep images on, these measures are necessary so the trolls cannot strike again in the same ways as before. smile

We're aware that this is a difficult sacrifice to make, but we're only doing it temporarily until we work out some sort of a better solution. In the meantime, you can have fun typing the [img] tags without an image appearing! big_smile

SJRCS_011 · 2011-12-31 10:40:34

What did I miss? I was away on vacation, and couldn't get on Scratch 'cause I didn't have Internet access.
So, what happened?
(they still work in sigs, though)

SJRCS_011 · 2011-12-31 10:41:50

coolstuff wrote:
PlutoIsHades wrote:
You guys are seriously overreacting. Hundreds of us are being punished for something we took absolutely no part in!

You guys always tell us not to feed the trolls. But right now, you're overreacting to the troll, which means you're feeding the trolls.

This was a horrible decision on your part.
This is not a punishment; it's a precaution. We understand that none of you had anything to do with the attacks and it was an outsider troll (though it could be one of the people who have trolled our forums before). And while it would be all well and good to keep images on, these measures are necessary so the trolls cannot strike again in the same ways as before.

We're aware that this is a difficult sacrifice to make, but we're only doing it temporarily until we work out some sort of a better solution. In the meantime, you can have fun typing the [url]tags without an image appearing!

Or you could provide a direct link to the picture.

Hardmath123 · 2012-01-01 04:44:07

coolstuff wrote:
PlutoIsHades wrote:
You guys are seriously overreacting. Hundreds of us are being punished for something we took absolutely no part in!

You guys always tell us not to feed the trolls. But right now, you're overreacting to the troll, which means you're feeding the trolls.

This was a horrible decision on your part.
This is not a punishment; it's a precaution. We understand that none of you had anything to do with the attacks and it was an outsider troll (though it could be one of the people who have trolled our forums before). And while it would be all well and good to keep images on, these measures are necessary so the trolls cannot strike again in the same ways as before.

We're aware that this is a difficult sacrifice to make, but we're only doing it temporarily until we work out some sort of a better solution. In the meantime, you can have fun typing the [url]tags without an image appearing!

For some reason, in the original post, the rest appears as "big_smile"

joefarebrother · 2012-01-01 07:09:24

does the meow image still work? let me test... _meow_

HD123 · 2012-01-01 09:47:56

Trolls are mean.

DigiTechs · 2012-01-01 11:41:35

I am not going to post the idea i just had, incase the ST and mods actually do it, as another precaution >_< anyway, this [ img] tag ban has no affect on me, and I don't know why at all. I still see images, where the [ img] tags are, and it's just odd.. really, odd....

mmww · 2012-01-01 20:57:00

Paddle2See wrote:
Servine wrote:
I respect your desicion, but...

@ The forums are now a bit more boring
Security always has a price. I don't like having to use keys to get into my house and car all the time - but I lock them anyway because I think it makes them more secure. It's unfortunate that everyone has to suffer because of the actions of a few individuals.
Servine wrote:
@ Bye-bye Block Library
It's too bad about the block library. Maybe it should be moved over to the wiki?
Servine wrote:
@ Everything is less attractive
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I've heard. On the plus side, the pages will load faster and there won't be any more image spamming.
Servine wrote:
Couldn't we just upload the post, but until a mod looks at it, the tags are disabled.
We are happy to consider suggestions as long as they meet our security concerns and don't create a large drain on our moderation or development resources. There's no feature in the current forum software for doing what you suggest.

Honestly no offense Paddle2see, but those kind of sound like cheezy excuses.... sad

Scratch

archived forums

#101 2011-12-30 19:53:37

Re: Image tags disabled

Servine wrote:

#102 2011-12-30 19:57:35

Re: Image tags disabled

#103 2011-12-30 20:03:38

Re: Image tags disabled

fg123 wrote:

#104 2011-12-30 20:10:00

Re: Image tags disabled

cheddargirl wrote:

fg123 wrote:

#105 2011-12-30 20:12:03

Re: Image tags disabled

#106 2011-12-30 20:55:05

Re: Image tags disabled

#107 2011-12-30 21:09:34

Re: Image tags disabled

fg123 wrote:

cheddargirl wrote:

fg123 wrote:

#108 2011-12-30 22:29:45

Re: Image tags disabled

#109 2011-12-30 22:41:32

Re: Image tags disabled

#110 2011-12-31 00:07:26

Re: Image tags disabled

mattb777 wrote:

#111 2011-12-31 00:43:23

Re: Image tags disabled

#112 2011-12-31 00:52:51

Re: Image tags disabled

mattb777 wrote:

#113 2011-12-31 01:36:56

Re: Image tags disabled

#114 2011-12-31 02:30:39

Re: Image tags disabled

fg123 wrote:

#115 2011-12-31 02:44:25

Re: Image tags disabled

mattb777 wrote:

#116 2011-12-31 08:29:32

Re: Image tags disabled

#117 2011-12-31 10:17:43

Re: Image tags disabled

PlutoIsHades wrote:

#118 2011-12-31 10:36:22

Re: Image tags disabled

PlutoIsHades wrote:

#119 2011-12-31 10:40:34

Re: Image tags disabled

#120 2011-12-31 10:41:50

Re: Image tags disabled

coolstuff wrote:

PlutoIsHades wrote:

#121 2012-01-01 04:44:07

Re: Image tags disabled

coolstuff wrote:

PlutoIsHades wrote:

#122 2012-01-01 07:09:24

Re: Image tags disabled

#123 2012-01-01 09:47:56

Re: Image tags disabled

#124 2012-01-01 11:41:35

Re: Image tags disabled

#125 2012-01-01 20:57:00

Re: Image tags disabled

Paddle2See wrote:

Servine wrote:

Servine wrote:

Servine wrote:

Servine wrote:

Board footer