Offline
CheckItNow12 wrote:
Pecola1 wrote:
CheckItNow12 wrote:
Nope. Younger children shouldn't be denied from seeing projects.
*facepalm* ... but the parent would be allowed to say weather they could or not.
Do i have to explain this all again or will you just read my posts. XDCould you stop using other people's sigs? XD
>:) Yes.
I CAN.
Last edited by Pecola1 (2011-11-20 17:16:38)
Offline
SpriteMaster wrote:
So is a bad word?
yeah... the cra word is too.
Remember when they made up carpletunnel surgery?
Offline
Anyone else support?
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
If you want to make such a site, using the ScratchR platform, feel free to talk to the Scratch Team about it. I'd definitely be happy to join such a site, and I've done such in the past.
Offline
There a bunch of CR Words that aren't even bad, like:
CRicket
CRanberry
CRaigslist
CRane
See?
Offline
CheckItNow12 wrote:
There a bunch of CR Words that aren't even bad, like:
CRicket
CRanberry
CRaigslist
CRane
See?
Yeah but you don't think I'de say the word do you?
XD
Offline
SpriteMaster wrote:
So CRUD is a bad word?
apperently, yes
OOOOOOooooh, you said a bad woOOOOooOOOrd
Offline
nightmarescratcher wrote:
SpriteMaster wrote:
So CRUD is a bad word?
apperently, yes
OOOOOOooooh, you said a bad woOOOOooOOOrd
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Offline
veggieman wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
If you want to make such a site, using the ScratchR platform, feel free to talk to the Scratch Team about it. I'd definitely be happy to join such a site, and I've done such in the past.
Offline
Scratch isn't about that. Scratch is for children. And LOTS of children lie about their age. If I was seven, and I had my own Email, then I would say I was thirteen so I could use my own Email, instead of my parent's.
Offline
jurk wrote:
no offence but I think it is childish that you want to put a bad word on scratch.
The above sentence is pure irony.
Offline
henley wrote:
jurk wrote:
no offence but I think it is childish that you want to put a bad word on scratch.
The above sentence is pure irony.
LOL
But guys, it would not allow you to put bad words, only block slightly more bad words for children, and if the child lies, there's nothing for the ST to do, if the child wants to see bad words so be it!
Offline
Pecola1 wrote:
henley wrote:
jurk wrote:
no offence but I think it is childish that you want to put a bad word on scratch.
The above sentence is pure irony.
LOL
But guys, it would not allow you to put bad words, only block slightly more bad words for children, and if the child lies, there's nothing for the ST to do, if the child wants to see bad words so be it!
that is a bit better but still why do you want to do it :-S
Offline
KyleK7 wrote:
Pecola1 wrote:
Come on doesn't anyone think it would be nice to not see as many bloody projects out there which have slightly bad words?
I'm -10. This means I couldn't view half the projects on scratch.
Me too. I would file a complaint to the ST and they would unblock everything of course. Because if they dont I know what I will do >:D
Last edited by Daroach1 (2011-11-27 07:45:38)
Offline
I agree and disagree.
-Let's say there are three users; user 1 is over 10. User 2 is over 12. User 3 is over 14.
-User 3 tells users 1 and 2 to view one of their projects.
-User 3 has rated the project "10+ only for mild blood."
-Users 1 and 2 are given the choice to view this project. It is their choice, provided user 3 is not lying.
-If user 3 is lying, he can be reported and warned.
-User 3 then releases another project, "12+ only for violence and mild language."
-User 1, who is under 12, cannot view at all.
-User 2, who is over 12, can choose to view if they wish.
-Once someone is over 15, they no longer have to choose. Everything becomes automatically available.
Offline
JJROCKER wrote:
No, I do not agree. Scratch should be for everyone and a certain people should not be zoned out.
Did you read any of the posts?
Offline
joty231 wrote:
another small problem is that younger people lie about their age when signing up
i didnt
Offline
What I suggest is that there should be two different scratch sites, one for teens and one for children. I understand that some teens like making games for young children, but I think it is not fair that teens cannot post anything that they want to post and that there is no other program that has the freedom that scratch has to offer. All I am trying to say is why not scratch would still get the benefit of people still using there sites. So I think that scratch should have two sites.
Offline
I support, they did this on Wurm online, as it was rated 18+ due to the community swearing. They forced the censor on accounts with the owner's age under 14, and if they lied then they couldn't really complain about the swearing as:
1. They lied, it's their fault.
2. There's a censor which you can turn on and off anyway (unless you're under 14 ofcourse, then it'd be locked on on).
This wouldn't split the community, this'd enrich it, if the project owner wanted a younger audience to view it they'd at least make another project which is censored. If Scratch had a censor which was locked at on when the owner is under 14 it'd indeed enrich it, if on a Minecraft server topic someone said "Banned XXXX for saying the c word" people can then get a lot of bad words from that. And if they lie about their age then complain about swearing then that's their own fault.
Offline