Scratch

@rookwood101, last month I got a beast too    My dad is an IT guy who gets allot of free stuff from his work place so for a long time I got nothing but hand me down dino's. Then I bought something pretty sweet for my bday.

xly wrote:

@ Jens

THANK YOU FOR SCROLLING SPEED UP !!

http://www.xleroy.net/ByobTuto/New/Snap!/flowers.gif

show off 

What's the 16:25? 

New scrolling is awesome! Thanks, Jens. 

My dual core Pentium thanks you very much Jens.    Though I've noticed any momentum the scrolling had is now gone. Have you decided to remove that feature?

Jens wrote:

okay, you guys can now start experimenting with the new reporter slot in the CALL block!

is this what you're talking about, or is it a bug?

Here's a not very good list implementation:

Taneb wrote:

Here's a not very good list implementation:

That's a great list implementation!  Except, I would pick different names for the inputs to make it a little easier to read.     And I would start with an empty list (could just be the word "the-empty-list" or anything other than a function) instead of a singleton list.

bharvey wrote:

roijac wrote:

i made a BYOB .deb package!

Thanks!  It's up on the web page.  Now see if you can convert it to a .rpm package. 

don't think i'll make also a .rpm, i'm too lazy 
anyway, the site doesn't look like updated :S

Hardmath123 wrote:

roijac wrote:

bharvey wrote:

Thanks!  It's up on the web page.  Now see if you can convert it to a .rpm package. 

don't think i'll make also a .rpm, i'm too lazy 
anyway, the site doesn't look like updated :S

It is, look in downloads.

i deleted cache and it's there 
oops...

bharvey wrote:

Taneb wrote:

Here's a not very good list implementation:

That's a great list implementation!  Except, I would pick different names for the inputs to make it a little easier to read.     And I would start with an empty list (could just be the word "the-empty-list" or anything other than a function) instead of a singleton list.

I made these changes, wasn't hard at all:


I also think there should be a shorthand for call with inputs. With big projects in 3.1, I generally make one myself. As it stands, they are REALLLY LONG compared to other languages where they are just brackets, or in Haskell, just implied. (call (the (( ) + ( )) block) with inputs (8) (9)) is equivalent to Haskell's (+) 8 9.

ALSO also, the .deb installer doesn't work for me. I'm on Ubuntu 11.04, which may explain it, but still.

joefarebrother wrote:

UNLESS you made a "list" class using[url=http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=73428]my idea[/url!!!

Ah.  I have to confess, I rarely manage to get to the (other) Advanced Topics (let alone anywhere else in the fora), so it's best to put suggestions either here or at byobugs.com.

We are pretty committed to prototyping OOP rather than class/instance OOP.  The latter is a trivial extension to the former, but not the other way around.  And we're at the moment committed to using sprites as the objects; you can make some other kind of object by just hiding the associated sprite (but you can still find it in the sprite corral, to edit its properties, which is a plus).

But, yeah, you could make a List sprite, with a constructor method (although we don't call them that; you'd just write a global New List block that would ASK [ASK (List) [CLONE]] [Constructor <val>...]

Summary:  We can already do what you want in 3.1 and will be able to do it in 4.0 before its official release.

i made a cool spring

...

By any chance, could you give me the code for an individual block? I'd like to try making some Snap! blocks.

EDIT: I know about the empty hole in the Set block, I took that out before taking the picture. And yes, I did run the set one before.

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2011-10-22 08:07:45)