roijac_test wrote:
are u going to update soon?
It seems as if we need more librarians, cause not everyone is active.
Offline
I'm not sure more is the right term, perhapse it might be worth asking those librarians who haven't been very active if they truly feel they have the time at the moment and then if any step down - even temporarily, we can look for suitable replacements?
Offline
sparks wrote:
I'm not sure more is the right term, perhapse it might be worth asking those librarians who haven't been very active if they truly feel they have the time at the moment and then if any step down - even temporarily, we can look for suitable replacements?
Yeah, I didn't think we needed more. I was just saying that maybe we need some new ones to replace.
Offline
SJRCS_011 wrote:
BYOB blocks:
Forever when % is true:
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6225/625 … b8eb_m.jpg
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6093/625 … e7df_m.jpg
Forever when % is false:
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6103/625 … 37e5_m.jpg
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6045/625 … 12e7_m.jpg
Theese wont work, because the condition is evaluated at the start and is never changed. What you need to do is replace the boolean with a boolean unevaluated input, and replace |wait until (condition)| with |wait until (call (condition))| (make sure there is no gray border in the call block)
Offline
Amos wrote:
Hi Miles,
Sorry about that! Paddle2See and I were just discussing coming up with new rules about linking that will make linking to weebly sites totally fine (and take it off the black list). Hopefully they'll go into effect in the next day or so.... So sit tight.
-Amos
Offline
joefarebrother wrote:
SJRCS_011 wrote:
BYOB blocks:
Forever when % is true:
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6225/625 … b8eb_m.jpg
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6093/625 … e7df_m.jpg
Forever when % is false:
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6103/625 … 37e5_m.jpg
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6045/625 … 12e7_m.jpgTheese wont work, because the condition is evaluated at the start and is never changed. What you need to do is replace the boolean with a boolean unevaluated input, and replace |wait until (condition)| with |wait until (call (condition))| (make sure there is no gray border in the call block)
use this as a suggestion.
Last edited by tpaley (2011-10-17 19:15:15)
Offline
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
sparks wrote:
I'm not sure more is the right term, perhapse it might be worth asking those librarians who haven't been very active if they truly feel they have the time at the moment and then if any step down - even temporarily, we can look for suitable replacements?
Yeah, I didn't think we needed more. I was just saying that maybe we need some new ones to replace.
Don't we still need a replacement for TheSuccessor?
Offline
Hey, Greenatic, you'd make a great librarian! I nominate him.
Offline
sparks wrote:
I'm not sure more is the right term, perhapse it might be worth asking those librarians who haven't been very active if they truly feel they have the time at the moment and then if any step down - even temporarily, we can look for suitable replacements?
I feel that I'm not active. I would be willing to step down if other felt the need.
Offline
Greenatic wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
sparks wrote:
I'm not sure more is the right term, perhapse it might be worth asking those librarians who haven't been very active if they truly feel they have the time at the moment and then if any step down - even temporarily, we can look for suitable replacements?
Yeah, I didn't think we needed more. I was just saying that maybe we need some new ones to replace.
Don't we still need a replacement for TheSuccessor?
Yes, I don't think he's posted in a while.
Yeah, I think that you would be a good nominee.
Meanwhile, I need to get more active in coding in Squeak.
Offline
tpaley wrote:
...
use this as a suggestion.
what is this block for?
Offline
sparks wrote:
Amos wrote:
Hi Miles,
Sorry about that! Paddle2See and I were just discussing coming up with new rules about linking that will make linking to weebly sites totally fine (and take it off the black list). Hopefully they'll go into effect in the next day or so.... So sit tight.
-Amos
YAY! Thank you Amos and Paddle2See!
Offline
roijac_test wrote:
tpaley wrote:
...
use this as a suggestion.
http://i51.tinypic.com/245dco8.gifwhat is this block for?
It seems it simply runs the blocks. XD
Offline
Thanks to the Hardmath123 and ProgrammingFreak for nominating me. So long as it doesn't involve giving out any personal information, such as my e-mail address, then I might be able to...
Offline
Greenatic wrote:
Thanks to the Hardmath123 and ProgrammingFreak for nominating me. So long as it doesn't involve giving out any personal information, such as my e-mail address, then I might be able to...
Any time.
Offline
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
Greenatic wrote:
Thanks to the Hardmath123 and ProgrammingFreak for nominating me. So long as it doesn't involve giving out any personal information, such as my e-mail address, then I might be able to...
Any time.
+1
You're the most active user around here. We need someone like that.
Oh, and two blocks.
('Evaluate Squeak code: %s' #- #evaluateSqu: #'self beep') ('Evaluate mathematical expression: %s' #r #evalMath: #'1+1')
evaluateSqu:code "by LS97" Compiler evaluate: code
evalMath:exp "by Hardmath, partial credit to LS97" ^ Compiler evaluate: exp
Last edited by Hardmath123 (2011-10-19 04:35:44)
Offline
Greenatic, I do think that you might do a good job as a librarian to replace TheSuccessor. You have been know in the past to be a little impatient/rude so as long as you can remember to remain polite and friendly on this thread
You will need to give me your email, the same as the other librarians so that private contact can be established, however, you won't need to post the email here, I'll post my Scratch email and you can send your address to that.
Offline
If he doesn't feel comfortable doing that, I can setup an alternative means of contact. It doesn't take that much effort.
And it would be similar to emailing.
Last edited by ssss (2011-10-19 06:35:26)
Offline
ssss wrote:
If he doesn't feel comfortable doing that, I can setup an alternative means of contact. It doesn't take that much effort.
And it would be similar to emailing.
Yeah, I can think of many ways.
Offline
Well, it just happens that my e-mail itself gives away my full name/identity, so it's probably not a good idea.
@Sparks: I understand what you mean, and I'll do my best to change that.
Offline
Greenatic wrote:
Well, it just happens that my e-mail itself gives away my full name/identity, so it's probably not a good idea.
@Sparks: I understand what you mean, and I'll do my best to change that.
well we can do a workaround, I'm sure! Otherwise you could always create an email account using your greenatic name like myself, yahoo, google etc all offer free mail accounts!
If I can fix the MySQL problems on the block library site (I might use one of my own sites as a database host) then it might simply be easier for all the librarians to have a private contact/chat area there. It could even email you if you get a message (Then you could enter the email but no-one would be able to see it.
Yes, I actually like the idea of trying to move the MySQL... It's a pain that it only sometimes works at the moment...
Last edited by sparks (2011-10-20 02:15:16)
Offline
Happy Birthday To Sparks
Last edited by ProgrammingFreak (2011-10-20 10:45:12)
Offline