rookwood101 wrote:
comp500 wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
Nope.
@sidharth thanks!and you need to transfer database.
the database is lost, when they suspended my account I was given no access to any of it.
What happened anyway that they suspended you?
Offline
WindowsExplorer wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
comp500 wrote:
and you need to transfer database.the database is lost, when they suspended my account I was given no access to any of it.
What happened anyway that they suspended you?
He overused their cpu xD
Offline
ssss wrote:
WindowsExplorer wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
the database is lost, when they suspended my account I was given no access to any of it.What happened anyway that they suspended you?
He overused their cpu xD
Is that server memory?
Offline
WindowsExplorer wrote:
ssss wrote:
WindowsExplorer wrote:
What happened anyway that they suspended you?He overused their cpu xD
Is that server memory?
? You don't know what a cpu is?
central processing unit...
Offline
ssss wrote:
WindowsExplorer wrote:
ssss wrote:
He overused their cpu xDIs that server memory?
? You don't know what a cpu is?
central processing unit...
what is the max % of cpu ur allowed to use?
Offline
Suspended for violating 20%+ CPU usage limit for more than 1000 times.
Offline
rookwood101 wrote:
the database is lost, when they suspended my account I was given no access to any of it.
How un-smart of them! Atleast they could have let you take all the files out and host them somewhere else! That was your work, and your account's suspension came very quickly!

Offline
Sidharth wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
the database is lost, when they suspended my account I was given no access to any of it.
How un-smart of them! Atleast they could have let you take all the files out and host them somewhere else! That was your work, and your account's suspension came very quickly!
Actually, all the files I have are from my pc, as they didn't let me take the files either
Offline
rookwood101 wrote:
Sidharth wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
the database is lost, when they suspended my account I was given no access to any of it.
How un-smart of them! Atleast they could have let you take all the files out and host them somewhere else! That was your work, and your account's suspension came very quickly!
Actually, all the files I have are from my pc, as they didn't let me take the files either
![]()
Better than paid webhosting my eye!
Offline
WindowsExplorer wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
Sidharth wrote:
How un-smart of them! Atleast they could have let you take all the files out and host them somewhere else! That was your work, and your account's suspension came very quickly!Actually, all the files I have are from my pc, as they didn't let me take the files either
![]()
Better than paid webhosting my eye!
I don't understand why you keep saying this.
Offline
WindowsExplorer wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
Sidharth wrote:
How un-smart of them! Atleast they could have let you take all the files out and host them somewhere else! That was your work, and your account's suspension came very quickly!Actually, all the files I have are from my pc, as they didn't let me take the files either
![]()
Better than paid webhosting my eye!
Well, actually, it is in most cases. Just because it's public, they have to have /some/ restructions.
@rookwood101: Did they send you a warning? 999 times?

Offline
Sidharth wrote:
WindowsExplorer wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
Actually, all the files I have are from my pc, as they didn't let me take the files either![]()
Better than paid webhosting my eye!
Well, actually, it is in most cases. Just because it's public, they have to have /some/ restructions.
@rookwood101: Did they send you a warning? 999 times?
nope
Offline
rookwood101 wrote:
Sidharth wrote:
WindowsExplorer wrote:
Better than paid webhosting my eye!Well, actually, it is in most cases. Just because it's public, they have to have /some/ restructions.
@rookwood101: Did they send you a warning? 999 times?nope
Well, now that's just odd. And what caused more than 20% of CPU to be used?!

Offline
Sidharth wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
Sidharth wrote:
Well, actually, it is in most cases. Just because it's public, they have to have /some/ restructions.
@rookwood101: Did they send you a warning? 999 times?nope
Well, now that's just odd. And what caused more than 20% of CPU to be used?!
First of all, the php script must get many requests, as the scratch forums are a popular place, and many pages have the like button, everytime someone goes on that page, the image will be requested by them. Second, the image is generated everytime by combining the background image, with text, and outputing it to the browser. All of these things add up, and eventually you end up using more than 20%
Offline
ssss wrote:
So you now use your own pc.
no, I use a vps host that I rent with a few of my friends for £30 per month ish.
with http://www.thrustvps.com
Last edited by rookwood101 (2011-10-09 04:49:12)
Offline
rookwood101 wrote:
ssss wrote:
So you now use your own pc.
no, I use a vps host that I rent with a few of my friends for £30 per month ish.
with http://www.thrustvps.com
Ah. It was just it was an Ip, rather than a web address
Offline
ssss wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
ssss wrote:
So you now use your own pc.
no, I use a vps host that I rent with a few of my friends for £30 per month ish.
with http://www.thrustvps.comAh. It was just it was an Ip, rather than a web address
![]()
What do you mean?
Offline
rookwood101 wrote:
ssss wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
no, I use a vps host that I rent with a few of my friends for £30 per month ish.
with http://www.thrustvps.comAh. It was just it was an Ip, rather than a web address
![]()
What do you mean?
He means connect port 627 to port 663 and set IP to 17833.489.44 and run the goUU+1 sever, then run the API and code to run the localhost:9004.
Actually, I dont' know what it means
Offline
rookwood101 wrote:
ssss wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
no, I use a vps host that I rent with a few of my friends for £30 per month ish.
with http://www.thrustvps.comAh. It was just it was an Ip, rather than a web address
![]()
What do you mean?
The dot.tk iframe was showing that it was based off an IP, not an actually DNS
Offline
ssss wrote:
rookwood101 wrote:
ssss wrote:
Ah. It was just it was an Ip, rather than a web address![]()
What do you mean?
The dot.tk iframe was showing that it was based off an IP, not an actually DNS
![]()
err there is no .tk iframe at http://rookwood101.tk it uses the actual dns, and the dns is to an ip, as it should be.
Offline
This is awesome! Would it be possible to make a poll where users can vote for which item on the poll they like best but they can only vote for 1 item? If so, that will be EPIC!!!!!!!!
Offline
zippynk wrote:
I get this: http://rookwood101.tk/topicrate.php?id= … ;ret=image
Do I need to sign up or something?
meowmeow55 and I have replied on your topic explaining what you need to do.
[url=http://rookwood101.tk/topicrate.php?id=77952&ret=add][url]http://rookwood101.tk/topicrate.php?id=77952&ret=image[/url]
Use the above code, it will work.
Last edited by rookwood101 (2011-10-16 17:52:36)
Offline