This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2011-10-03 19:48:24

AnimeCreatorArtist
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-25
Posts: 1000+

Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

5. me 2. coming 1. always 4. take 6. down 3. from



You have 47 seconds! GO!


http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20121209020158/adventuretimewithfinnandjake/images/9/93/Prismo.png
I'm basically honorary nasty. N-n-n-n-nasty jazz

Offline

 

#2 2011-10-03 21:07:47

ihaveamac
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-09-22
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

It's a rickroll thing, isn't it? I've seen it before.


~ihaveamac - visit ihaveamac.net

Offline

 

#3 2011-10-03 21:08:32

veggieman001
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

always coming from take me down

what


Posts: 20000 - Show all posts

Offline

 

#4 2011-10-03 21:08:53

ssss
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-29
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

Never gonna let you down.
Say the opposite of what you mean.


Hey.  It's me SSSS, back from the dead!  smile

Offline

 

#5 2011-10-03 21:12:32

ssss
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-29
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

ssss wrote:

Never gonna let you down.
Say the opposite of what you mean.

lol.  Looks like he  messed it up xD


Hey.  It's me SSSS, back from the dead!  smile

Offline

 

#6 2011-10-03 21:23:43

nathanprocks
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-04-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...


http://carrot.cassiedragonandfriends.org/Scratch_Signature/randomsig.php
http://trinary.site40.net/images/scratchrank.php?username=nathanprocks&display=small

Offline

 

#7 2011-10-03 23:58:33

helltank
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

The code works this way.

First, you arrange the words in order, according to the numbers. You get:

Always Coming From Take Me Down

Then, you write the opposite of each word, which would be:

Never Going To Give You Up


Rickrolled.


Error:Signature could not load. Please wait for an indefinite amount of time, until you realize you're gullible and go off to look for another potentially interesting signature to stare at.

Offline

 

#8 2011-10-04 00:01:52

wulfmaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-04-23
Posts: 500+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

helltank wrote:

The code works this way.

First, you arrange the words in order, according to the numbers. You get:

Always Coming From Take Me Down

Then, you write the opposite of each word, which would be:

Never Going To Give You Up


Rickrolled.

They are only rick - rolled if they don't like the song.  If they like the song, it doesn't work  smile


Social Connections - Bringing communities close together! http://cyberkidscountry.com/ip.php

Offline

 

#9 2011-10-04 00:21:45

helltank
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

wulfmaster wrote:

helltank wrote:

The code works this way.

First, you arrange the words in order, according to the numbers. You get:

Always Coming From Take Me Down

Then, you write the opposite of each word, which would be:

Never Going To Give You Up


Rickrolled.

They are only rick - rolled if they don't like the song.  If they like the song, it doesn't work  smile

Nope.

KnowYourMeme wrote:

Rickrolling is a bait-and-switch practice that involves providing a web link supposedly relevant to the topic at hand, but actually re-directs the viewer to Rick Astley’s 1987 hit single “Never Gonna Give You Up.” The URL is often masked or obfuscated as a randomly-generated shortlink to conceal its true source from the experienced users. Whenever someone clicks the link and unintentionally summons Rick Astley’s song, he or she is said to have been rickrolled.

Nothing about liking or disliking the song in there. I like Never Gonna Give You Up, but I've been rickrolled before(ONCE).

Other sources that prove my argument:
A Youtube Video Explaining Rickrolling

Last edited by helltank (2011-10-04 00:23:38)


Error:Signature could not load. Please wait for an indefinite amount of time, until you realize you're gullible and go off to look for another potentially interesting signature to stare at.

Offline

 

#10 2011-10-04 00:31:39

wulfmaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-04-23
Posts: 500+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

helltank wrote:

wulfmaster wrote:

helltank wrote:

The code works this way.

First, you arrange the words in order, according to the numbers. You get:

Always Coming From Take Me Down

Then, you write the opposite of each word, which would be:

Never Going To Give You Up


Rickrolled.

They are only rick - rolled if they don't like the song.  If they like the song, it doesn't work  smile

Nope.

KnowYourMeme wrote:

Rickrolling is a bait-and-switch practice that involves providing a web link supposedly relevant to the topic at hand, but actually re-directs the viewer to Rick Astley’s 1987 hit single “Never Gonna Give You Up.” The URL is often masked or obfuscated as a randomly-generated shortlink to conceal its true source from the experienced users. Whenever someone clicks the link and unintentionally summons Rick Astley’s song, he or she is said to have been rickrolled.

Nothing about liking or disliking the song in there. I like Never Gonna Give You Up, but I've been rickrolled before(ONCE).

Other sources that prove my argument:
A Youtube Video Explaining Rickrolling

I've never been rick-roll'd, because I like the song and click on every link hoping that it is thAT song.  Therefore have never been tricked, thus liking it makes it obsolete for me.-


Social Connections - Bringing communities close together! http://cyberkidscountry.com/ip.php

Offline

 

#11 2011-10-04 00:42:56

helltank
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

wulfmaster wrote:

helltank wrote:

wulfmaster wrote:


They are only rick - rolled if they don't like the song.  If they like the song, it doesn't work  smile

Nope.

KnowYourMeme wrote:

Rickrolling is a bait-and-switch practice that involves providing a web link supposedly relevant to the topic at hand, but actually re-directs the viewer to Rick Astley’s 1987 hit single “Never Gonna Give You Up.” The URL is often masked or obfuscated as a randomly-generated shortlink to conceal its true source from the experienced users. Whenever someone clicks the link and unintentionally summons Rick Astley’s song, he or she is said to have been rickrolled.

Nothing about liking or disliking the song in there. I like Never Gonna Give You Up, but I've been rickrolled before(ONCE).

Other sources that prove my argument:
A Youtube Video Explaining Rickrolling

I've never been rick-roll'd, because I like the song and click on every link hoping that it is thAT song.  Therefore have never been tricked, thus liking it makes it obsolete for me.-

"Whenever some one clicks the link". So it doesn't matter if it was intentional or unintentional.

Don't try to argue with me. I have Moon Logic and Insane Troll Logic on my side.


Error:Signature could not load. Please wait for an indefinite amount of time, until you realize you're gullible and go off to look for another potentially interesting signature to stare at.

Offline

 

#12 2011-10-04 01:15:44

wulfmaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-04-23
Posts: 500+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

helltank wrote:

wulfmaster wrote:

helltank wrote:

wulfmaster wrote:

They are only rick - rolled if they don't like the song.  If they like the song, it doesn't work  smile

Nope.


Nothing about liking or disliking the song in there. I like Never Gonna Give You Up, but I've been rickrolled before(ONCE).

Other sources that prove my argument:
A Youtube Video Explaining Rickrolling

I've never been rick-roll'd, because I like the song and click on every link hoping that it is thAT song.  Therefore have never been tricked, thus liking it makes it obsolete for me.-

"Whenever some one clicks the link". So it doesn't matter if it was intentional or unintentional.

Don't try to argue with me. I have Moon Logic and Insane Troll Logic on my side.

Did I tell you  I don't believe in:
Spam
Trolls
Religion
Superstition
Stupid things like rick-rolls , the game etc etc?


Social Connections - Bringing communities close together! http://cyberkidscountry.com/ip.php

Offline

 

#13 2011-10-04 04:04:09

helltank
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

wulfmaster wrote:

helltank wrote:

wulfmaster wrote:

I've never been rick-roll'd, because I like the song and click on every link hoping that it is thAT song.  Therefore have never been tricked, thus liking it makes it obsolete for me.-

"Whenever some one clicks the link". So it doesn't matter if it was intentional or unintentional.

Don't try to argue with me. I have Moon Logic and Insane Troll Logic on my side.

Did I tell you  I don't believe in:
Spam
Trolls
Religion
Superstition
Stupid things like rick-rolls , the game etc etc?

You don't believe in real things?

Also, you lost the game.


Error:Signature could not load. Please wait for an indefinite amount of time, until you realize you're gullible and go off to look for another potentially interesting signature to stare at.

Offline

 

#14 2011-10-04 04:14:01

wulfmaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-04-23
Posts: 500+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

helltank wrote:

wulfmaster wrote:

helltank wrote:


"Whenever some one clicks the link". So it doesn't matter if it was intentional or unintentional.

Don't try to argue with me. I have Moon Logic and Insane Troll Logic on my side.

Did I tell you  I don't believe in:
Spam
Trolls
Religion
Superstition
Stupid things like rick-rolls , the game etc etc?

You don't believe in real things?

Also, you lost the game.

No i didn't.  I didn't think of it.  I don't think.


Social Connections - Bringing communities close together! http://cyberkidscountry.com/ip.php

Offline

 

#15 2011-10-04 04:49:10

helltank
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

wulfmaster wrote:

helltank wrote:

wulfmaster wrote:


Did I tell you  I don't believe in:
Spam
Trolls
Religion
Superstition
Stupid things like rick-rolls , the game etc etc?

You don't believe in real things?

Also, you lost the game.

No i didn't.  I didn't think of it.  I don't think.

...Therefore you aren't.

Quod erat demonstrandum, m'yes?


Error:Signature could not load. Please wait for an indefinite amount of time, until you realize you're gullible and go off to look for another potentially interesting signature to stare at.

Offline

 

#16 2011-10-04 05:00:04

wulfmaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-04-23
Posts: 500+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

helltank wrote:

wulfmaster wrote:

helltank wrote:


You don't believe in real things?

Also, you lost the game.

No i didn't.  I didn't think of it.  I don't think.

...Therefore you aren't.

Quod erat demonstrandum, m'yes?

Robot.


Social Connections - Bringing communities close together! http://cyberkidscountry.com/ip.php

Offline

 

#17 2011-10-04 05:08:02

Alternatives
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-09-16
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

wulfmaster wrote:

helltank wrote:

wulfmaster wrote:


Did I tell you  I don't believe in:
Spam
Trolls
Religion
Superstition
Stupid things like rick-rolls , the game etc etc?

You don't believe in real things?

Also, you lost the game.

No i didn't.  I didn't think of it.  I don't think.

The basis of your sentence is the game. Therefore, you just lost it.


http://i42.tinypic.com/98vmms.png
Well if you wanted honesty, that's all you had to say. I never want to let you down or have you go, it's better off this way.

Offline

 

#18 2011-10-04 08:59:32

helltank
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

wulfmaster wrote:

helltank wrote:

wulfmaster wrote:


No i didn't.  I didn't think of it.  I don't think.

...Therefore you aren't.

Quod erat demonstrandum, m'yes?

Robot.

Robots think, although they simply think within the limited constrains of their programming.

I'm still playing the Moon Logic card. Insane Troll Logic is not even unleashed yet.


Error:Signature could not load. Please wait for an indefinite amount of time, until you realize you're gullible and go off to look for another potentially interesting signature to stare at.

Offline

 

#19 2011-10-04 09:54:29

JJROCKER
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-09-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

I understand it.


http://www.blocks.scratchr.org/API.php?action=random&return=image&link1=http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/3491/signature1y.jpg&link2=http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/5272/signature1sx.jpg&link3=http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8514/signature1et.jpg&link4=http://i.imgur.com/POEpQyZ.png&link5=http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/4640/jjrockerfinal.jpg

Offline

 

#20 2011-10-04 10:26:47

maxskywalker
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-27
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

Memoic?

Offline

 

#21 2011-10-04 10:36:17

Dinoclor
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-06-10
Posts: 1000+

Re: Try To Decipher This Code In 47 Seconds...

Nice code.
Once I got rickrolled at a wiki site (someone kept changing links to Rick Astley).


This is a temporary signature. It will exist until I think of something witty.

Offline

 

Board footer