5. me 2. coming 1. always 4. take 6. down 3. from
You have 47 seconds! GO!
Offline
It's a rickroll thing, isn't it? I've seen it before.
Offline
always coming from take me down
what
Offline
The code works this way.
First, you arrange the words in order, according to the numbers. You get:
Always Coming From Take Me Down
Then, you write the opposite of each word, which would be:
Never Going To Give You Up
Rickrolled.
Offline
helltank wrote:
The code works this way.
First, you arrange the words in order, according to the numbers. You get:
Always Coming From Take Me Down
Then, you write the opposite of each word, which would be:
Never Going To Give You Up
Rickrolled.
They are only rick - rolled if they don't like the song. If they like the song, it doesn't work
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
helltank wrote:
The code works this way.
First, you arrange the words in order, according to the numbers. You get:
Always Coming From Take Me Down
Then, you write the opposite of each word, which would be:
Never Going To Give You Up
Rickrolled.They are only rick - rolled if they don't like the song. If they like the song, it doesn't work
![]()
Nope.
KnowYourMeme wrote:
Rickrolling is a bait-and-switch practice that involves providing a web link supposedly relevant to the topic at hand, but actually re-directs the viewer to Rick Astley’s 1987 hit single “Never Gonna Give You Up.” The URL is often masked or obfuscated as a randomly-generated shortlink to conceal its true source from the experienced users. Whenever someone clicks the link and unintentionally summons Rick Astley’s song, he or she is said to have been rickrolled.
Nothing about liking or disliking the song in there. I like Never Gonna Give You Up, but I've been rickrolled before(ONCE).
Other sources that prove my argument:
A Youtube Video Explaining Rickrolling
Last edited by helltank (2011-10-04 00:23:38)
Offline
helltank wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
helltank wrote:
The code works this way.
First, you arrange the words in order, according to the numbers. You get:
Always Coming From Take Me Down
Then, you write the opposite of each word, which would be:
Never Going To Give You Up
Rickrolled.They are only rick - rolled if they don't like the song. If they like the song, it doesn't work
![]()
Nope.
KnowYourMeme wrote:
Rickrolling is a bait-and-switch practice that involves providing a web link supposedly relevant to the topic at hand, but actually re-directs the viewer to Rick Astley’s 1987 hit single “Never Gonna Give You Up.” The URL is often masked or obfuscated as a randomly-generated shortlink to conceal its true source from the experienced users. Whenever someone clicks the link and unintentionally summons Rick Astley’s song, he or she is said to have been rickrolled.
Nothing about liking or disliking the song in there. I like Never Gonna Give You Up, but I've been rickrolled before(ONCE).
Other sources that prove my argument:
A Youtube Video Explaining Rickrolling
I've never been rick-roll'd, because I like the song and click on every link hoping that it is thAT song. Therefore have never been tricked, thus liking it makes it obsolete for me.-
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
helltank wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
They are only rick - rolled if they don't like the song. If they like the song, it doesn't work![]()
Nope.
KnowYourMeme wrote:
Rickrolling is a bait-and-switch practice that involves providing a web link supposedly relevant to the topic at hand, but actually re-directs the viewer to Rick Astley’s 1987 hit single “Never Gonna Give You Up.” The URL is often masked or obfuscated as a randomly-generated shortlink to conceal its true source from the experienced users. Whenever someone clicks the link and unintentionally summons Rick Astley’s song, he or she is said to have been rickrolled.
Nothing about liking or disliking the song in there. I like Never Gonna Give You Up, but I've been rickrolled before(ONCE).
Other sources that prove my argument:
A Youtube Video Explaining RickrollingI've never been rick-roll'd, because I like the song and click on every link hoping that it is thAT song. Therefore have never been tricked, thus liking it makes it obsolete for me.-
"Whenever some one clicks the link". So it doesn't matter if it was intentional or unintentional.
Don't try to argue with me. I have Moon Logic and Insane Troll Logic on my side.
Offline
helltank wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
helltank wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
They are only rick - rolled if they don't like the song. If they like the song, it doesn't work
![]()
Nope.
Nothing about liking or disliking the song in there. I like Never Gonna Give You Up, but I've been rickrolled before(ONCE).
Other sources that prove my argument:
A Youtube Video Explaining RickrollingI've never been rick-roll'd, because I like the song and click on every link hoping that it is thAT song. Therefore have never been tricked, thus liking it makes it obsolete for me.-
"Whenever some one clicks the link". So it doesn't matter if it was intentional or unintentional.
Don't try to argue with me. I have Moon Logic and Insane Troll Logic on my side.
Did I tell you I don't believe in:
Spam
Trolls
Religion
Superstition
Stupid things like rick-rolls , the game etc etc?
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
helltank wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
I've never been rick-roll'd, because I like the song and click on every link hoping that it is thAT song. Therefore have never been tricked, thus liking it makes it obsolete for me.-
"Whenever some one clicks the link". So it doesn't matter if it was intentional or unintentional.
Don't try to argue with me. I have Moon Logic and Insane Troll Logic on my side.Did I tell you I don't believe in:
Spam
Trolls
Religion
Superstition
Stupid things like rick-rolls , the game etc etc?
You don't believe in real things?
Also, you lost the game.
Offline
helltank wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
helltank wrote:
"Whenever some one clicks the link". So it doesn't matter if it was intentional or unintentional.
Don't try to argue with me. I have Moon Logic and Insane Troll Logic on my side.Did I tell you I don't believe in:
Spam
Trolls
Religion
Superstition
Stupid things like rick-rolls , the game etc etc?You don't believe in real things?
Also, you lost the game.
No i didn't. I didn't think of it. I don't think.
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
helltank wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
Did I tell you I don't believe in:
Spam
Trolls
Religion
Superstition
Stupid things like rick-rolls , the game etc etc?You don't believe in real things?
Also, you lost the game.No i didn't. I didn't think of it. I don't think.
...Therefore you aren't.
Quod erat demonstrandum, m'yes?
Offline
helltank wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
helltank wrote:
You don't believe in real things?
Also, you lost the game.No i didn't. I didn't think of it. I don't think.
...Therefore you aren't.
Quod erat demonstrandum, m'yes?
Robot.
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
helltank wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
Did I tell you I don't believe in:
Spam
Trolls
Religion
Superstition
Stupid things like rick-rolls , the game etc etc?You don't believe in real things?
Also, you lost the game.No i didn't. I didn't think of it. I don't think.
The basis of your sentence is the game. Therefore, you just lost it.
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
helltank wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
No i didn't. I didn't think of it. I don't think....Therefore you aren't.
Quod erat demonstrandum, m'yes?Robot.
Robots think, although they simply think within the limited constrains of their programming.
I'm still playing the Moon Logic card. Insane Troll Logic is not even unleashed yet.
Offline
Memoic?
Offline