Scratch
archived forums
#1 2011-09-23 18:35:02
- awesomestickdude
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-17
- Posts: 100+
So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
They have found something that goes faster then the speed of light. The exiting part is that this opens the possibility of time travel.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/com … _blog.html
Offline
#6 2011-09-23 18:49:00
- samurai768
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-21
- Posts: 1000+
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
Whoa 
@jfmlove6
Your sig goes so well with the topic 
Last edited by samurai768 (2011-09-23 18:50:05)
Offline
#7 2011-09-23 18:49:31
- awesomestickdude
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-17
- Posts: 100+
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
67589jun wrote:
It's probably something wrong with the systems. Don't think it's right - yet.
They tested it 15000 times and got the same result each time.
Offline
#8 2011-09-23 20:52:49
- PlutoIsHades
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-10-18
- Posts: 1000+
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
My science teacher mentioned that but didn't go into detail. 
Minecraft, Redwall, and Cyberchase fan, and PROUD.
Offline
#9 2011-09-23 21:00:57
Offline
#10 2011-09-23 21:21:24
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
awesomestickdude wrote:
67589jun wrote:
It's probably something wrong with the systems. Don't think it's right - yet.
They tested it 15000 times and got the same result each time.
and what reputable news site give you this information? You know how much it costs to run a single test on the LHC with almost no budget?
Offline
#12 2011-09-23 21:30:22
- awesomestickdude
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-17
- Posts: 100+
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
67589jun wrote:
awesomestickdude wrote:
67589jun wrote:
It's probably something wrong with the systems. Don't think it's right - yet.
They tested it 15000 times and got the same result each time.
and what reputable news site give you this information? You know how much it costs to run a single test on the LHC with almost no budget?
Like most of the news sites? They analyzed 15,000 particles.
Offline
#13 2011-09-23 21:38:04
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
I understand that this has been tested many times, but breaking the speed of light (and measuring such a phenomenon) is no small matter - there are a million factors to consider, and if this is true, it'll turn a lot of modern science on its head.
Basically, this is no small discovery. There's going to be a lot more testing and analysis of every possible influence to make absolutely sure that this can be affirmed. Until then, I'm taking this all with a large amount of skepticism. (Not that I doubt the integrity or the intelligence of the scientists who discovered this.)
Offline
#14 2011-09-23 22:44:54
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
Apparently there has been an experiment in which they made light go faster than the speed of light. What happened is it disappeared and reappeared when it slowed back down shortly after.
My site Find someone post count. Click posts under username. Find number of pages. Times that by 40 for min and 60 for max and you have a rough estimate of post count.
Offline
#15 2011-09-24 03:48:28
- jji7skyline
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-03-08
- Posts: 1000+
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
“Something exceeds the speed limit in Italy, and somehow this is news?”
Now that's funny! 
I don't know why you say goodbye, I say hello!
Offline
#16 2011-09-24 04:14:16
- Alternatives
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-09-16
- Posts: 1000+
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
67589jun wrote:
awesomestickdude wrote:
67589jun wrote:
It's probably something wrong with the systems. Don't think it's right - yet.
They tested it 15000 times and got the same result each time.
and what reputable news site give you this information? You know how much it costs to run a single test on the LHC with almost no budget?
Uh, it wasn't just a news site. I heard it on 2 different radio stations too.
Well if you wanted honesty, that's all you had to say. I never want to let you down or have you go, it's better off this way.
Offline
#18 2011-09-24 05:16:54
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
All you skeptics, listen up. I'm fortunate enough to be the son of one of the scientists involved in the experiment, and I tell you it's real.
As you know, Einstein's theory stated that lightspeed was an unbreakable constant... because of the mass particle accelerator being at a AHC. Thus the light particles were forced to waver at a constant speed, generating a "Graham's Bell" anomaly that WE ACCEPT AS TRUE!
So the scientists simply ran a atomic scanner over the MPA, and then they ran it and tested the particles that came out, finding them to be over the speed of like because GRAHAM'S BELL WAS NOT PRESENT! Can't you see?
The anomaly was smoothened out as per the sixth rule of gravity, and after they generated a stabilized and sterile testing position, the particle was no longer bound by the AHC warp, and Graham's Bell anomaly simply disappeared, allowing it to travel at its true speed, which is faster than lightspeed.
Error:Signature could not load. Please wait for an indefinite amount of time, until you realize you're gullible and go off to look for another potentially interesting signature to stare at.
Offline
#19 2011-09-24 07:48:58
- brettman98
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-10-17
- Posts: 1000+
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
Oh dear, if this reaches a full-scale catastrophe, now we'll ruin other planets as well.
Offline
#22 2011-09-24 10:44:01
- Sunrise-Moon
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-06-27
- Posts: 1000+
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
helltank wrote:
All you skeptics, listen up. I'm fortunate enough to be the son of one of the scientists involved in the experiment, and I tell you it's real.
As you know, Einstein's theory stated that lightspeed was an unbreakable constant... because of the mass particle accelerator being at a AHC. Thus the light particles were forced to waver at a constant speed, generating a "Graham's Bell" anomaly that WE ACCEPT AS TRUE!
So the scientists simply ran a atomic scanner over the MPA, and then they ran it and tested the particles that came out, finding them to be over the speed of like because GRAHAM'S BELL WAS NOT PRESENT! Can't you see?
The anomaly was smoothened out as per the sixth rule of gravity, and after they generated a stabilized and sterile testing position, the particle was no longer bound by the AHC warp, and Graham's Bell anomaly simply disappeared, allowing it to travel at its true speed, which is faster than lightspeed.
Trolling.
Offline
#23 2011-09-24 17:38:06
- AtomicBawm3
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-06-27
- Posts: 1000+
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
by neutrinos. Apparently they traveled a distance of 500 miles 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light. That's equivalent to .4 mps or 70 mph faster, which is roughly .00001% faster than the speed of light.
I can't find the article (my bro told me about it), but if anyone does, post it.
Last edited by AtomicBawm3 (2011-09-24 17:49:48)
Offline
#24 2011-09-24 17:39:11
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
AtomicBawm3 wrote:
by neutrinos. Apparently they travelled a distance of 500 mph 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light. That's equivalent to .4 mps or 70 mph faster, which is roughly .00001% faster than the speed of light.
I can't find the article (my bro told me about it), but if anyone does, post it.
already a topic about this
Offline
#25 2011-09-24 17:48:16
- randomnumber53
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-19
- Posts: 500+
Re: So Apparently Einstein Was Wrong
AtomicBawm3 wrote:
by neutrinos. Apparently they travelled a distance of 500 mph 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light. That's equivalent to .4 mps or 70 mph faster, which is roughly .00001% faster than the speed of light.
I can't find the article (my bro told me about it), but if anyone does, post it.
What!?!?
`·.,¸,.·*¯`·.,¸,.·*¯[;::;‹]ᵒᴥᵒ) Don't forget to add the +KITTENSOffline