it is so annoying having to upload a picyure you want just to put it on a forum page. Supporters: 1
joefarebrother
Offline
Well, I don't really have any problems with picyures.
Offline
Well, you have to upload them at some point, otherwise you can't post them. Are you suggesting that they put an uploader right into the forums? I suppose that could work, although they'd need an awful lot of server space.
Offline
It's not just Scratch, it's the whole internet. If there was an easy solution the whole internet would be using it. Plus, a feature like this would make BBCode completely useless.
Offline
hahhaha, sorry, i get annoyed with having to upload but if you understand computers then there is no other possibility to have other people see ur picture(upload means put file into the internet, [removed by moderator-please be respectful])
Last edited by Paddle2See (2011-08-27 04:47:56)
Offline
kya219 wrote:
hahhaha, sorry, i get annoyed with having to upload but if you understand computers then there is no other possibility to have other people see ur picture(upload means put file into the internet, [removed by moderator-please be respectful])
Don't be mean!
Last edited by Paddle2See (2011-08-27 04:48:12)
Offline
im not being mean im stating the fact that there is no possible way to get a file on the internet without uploading it... if you found another way it would still be uploading
Offline
no what i was thinking was maybe you could press a 'browse for an image' button which, when you select an image, it genarates a code which you put in an image tag and it reads that code and restores the image, which ISN'T saved anywhere on the web, thus it's not uploaded.
Offline
joefarebrother wrote:
no what i was thinking was maybe you could press a 'browse for an image' button which, when you select an image, it genarates a code which you put in an image tag and it reads that code and restores the image, which ISN'T saved anywhere on the web, thus it's not uploaded.
Nobody, apart from you, would be able to see that image, since they cannot access it, as it is not on the internet.
You cannot restore an image without accessing it.
Last edited by trinary (2012-04-14 04:43:49)
Offline
trinary wrote:
joefarebrother wrote:
no what i was thinking was maybe you could press a 'browse for an image' button which, when you select an image, it genarates a code which you put in an image tag and it reads that code and restores the image, which ISN'T saved anywhere on the web, thus it's not uploaded.
Nobody, apart from you, would be able to see that image, since they cannot access it, as it is not on the internet.
You cannot 'restore' an image without accessing it.
Actually I think what joefare is thinking about is something similar to data URIs. This is already possible but they dont work yet in most browsers.
Offline
jvvg wrote:
trinary wrote:
joefarebrother wrote:
no what i was thinking was maybe you could press a 'browse for an image' button which, when you select an image, it genarates a code which you put in an image tag and it reads that code and restores the image, which ISN'T saved anywhere on the web, thus it's not uploaded.
Nobody, apart from you, would be able to see that image, since they cannot access it, as it is not on the internet.
You cannot restore an image without accessing it.Actually I think what joefare is thinking about is something similar to data URIs. This is already possible but they dont work yet in most browsers.
That might actually be rather interesting.
However, most browsers do not support this, so it may be hard to implement.
Last edited by trinary (2012-04-14 04:48:03)
Offline
trinary wrote:
jvvg wrote:
trinary wrote:
Nobody, apart from you, would be able to see that image, since they cannot access it, as it is not on the internet.
You cannot restore an image without accessing it.Actually I think what joefare is thinking about is something similar to data URIs. This is already possible but they dont work yet in most browsers.
That might actually be rather interesting.
However, most browsers do not support this, so it may be hard to implement.
you're still technically uploading it, just in a plain text format
Offline
trinary wrote:
joefarebrother wrote:
no what i was thinking was maybe you could press a 'browse for an image' button which, when you select an image, it genarates a code which you put in an image tag and it reads that code and restores the image, which ISN'T saved anywhere on the web, thus it's not uploaded.
Nobody, apart from you, would be able to see that image, since they cannot access it, as it is not on the internet.
You cannot restore an image without accessing it.
no because it would be a code which any computer could read
tyrany wrote:
That might actually be rather interesting.
However, most browsers do not support this, so it may be hard to implement.
Not if the read/write code is on the server or the website's JavaScript!
TRocket wrote:
That is still technically uploading
well it is DIRECTLY in the [img] tag so it is not saved in a webpage of it's own.
Last edited by joefarebrother (2012-04-14 09:27:01)
Offline