Scratch

Death_Wish · 2011-08-21 21:14:44

Okay, before I get a rant of New Scratchers saying my idea is insane, I'd like to say something-This is a way to troll.
You can say bad words with it by just seperating a swear with them. Let's say lego was a bad word. You could just put le{b}{/b}go (I put the {} instead of the [] on purpose, so I could show an example). Somebody could swear a lot with it.

lilacfuzz101 · 2011-08-21 21:24:43

actually... it censors it if you seperate it with tags. So there's not really a need smile

veggieman001 · 2011-08-21 21:39:19

lilacfuzz101 wrote:
actually... it censors it if you seperate it with tags. So there's not really a need

No, it doesn't. I'd prove it, but I don't want to get banned.

I fully support!

JJROCKER · 2011-08-21 22:22:58

I don't support. Some scratcher might make a new account and overuse the bold, italics and underlining.

Death_Wish · 2011-08-21 23:12:46

JJROCKER wrote:
I don't support. Some scratcher might make a new account and overuse the bold, italics and underlining.

Overuse? I'm saying we should disable them for New Scratchers... hmm That way they wouldn't be able to overuse them. Currently, they would be able to, but if this idea gets accepted, they wouldn't. Got it? tongue

JJROCKER · 2011-08-21 23:28:13

Oh, sorry tongue I read it wrong. I thought you meant it is disabled and you want it not to be. Sorry. Yeah, then I support.

Barf_Bag · 2011-08-21 23:32:08

Even though they can be occasionally useful, I wholeheartedly agree.

kayybee · 2011-08-21 23:35:48

They could use [url] if they wanted to.

Death_Wish · 2011-08-21 23:53:07

kayybee wrote:
They could use [url] if they wanted to.

No, I don't think so. I'm pretty sure that wouldn't count as [url and ] together. Meh, I might as well try:

[url=google.com]Google[/url]

veggieman001 · 2011-08-22 00:00:53

Yeah that doesn't work.

kayybee · 2011-08-22 01:53:33

Death_Wish wrote:
kayybee wrote:
They could use [url] if they wanted to.
No, I don't think so. I'm pretty sure that wouldn't count as [url and ] together. Meh, I might as well try:

[url=google.com]Google[/url]

Huh?

I mean then can go
le[url]go[/url] or stuff like that.

Death_Wish · 2011-08-22 10:13:32

kayybee wrote:
Death_Wish wrote:
kayybee wrote:
They could use [url] if they wanted to.
No, I don't think so. I'm pretty sure that wouldn't count as [url and ] together. Meh, I might as well try:

[url=google.com]Google[/url]
Huh?

I mean then can go
le[url]go[/url] or stuff like that.

No, you can't. It says Sorry, New Scratchers cannot post urls to websites other than Scratch in their posts.

Death_Wish · 2011-08-22 10:20:29

kayybee wrote:
Death_Wish wrote:
kayybee wrote:
They could use [url] if they wanted to.
No, I don't think so. I'm pretty sure that wouldn't count as [url and ] together. Meh, I might as well try:

[url=google.com]Google[/url]
Huh?

I mean then can go
le[url]go[/url] or stuff like that.

No... With the [b}{/b] tags off, it wouldn't work, considering having [url} brackets in between anything (Such as your example, without the {b}{/b}) will say you can't. Or at least I think so, I'll test it out:

Yep, it doesn't work. I previewed it, and it said Scratchers can't post with the url thing to anything other than Scratch. So, with the bold things off, it'd be safe, no?
But wait, I wonder if this would work. I can't post it, of course, as I'd get banned, but what if you posted something like {url=scratch.mit.edu}lego{/url}? It'd work, because it only would catch Lego if it was alone, right? hmm

4lover · 2011-08-22 10:26:11

yep

Death_Wish · 2011-08-23 17:32:39

Bump tongue (I think this is my first bump ever yikes Maybe I did one in a Show&Tell project, though)

ImagineIt · 2011-08-24 16:27:08

They might do: Le[url=http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/edit.php?id=889845]g[/url}g

Last edited by ImagineIt (2011-08-24 16:28:33)

Death_Wish · 2011-08-24 16:29:09

ImagineIt wrote:
They might do: Le[url=Scratch.mit.edu][/url}go

I guess. I think there shouldn't be url tags for New Scratchers anyways-People can just link it normally, no?

joefarebrother · 2011-08-25 05:16:22

Death_Wish wrote:
(I put the {} instead of the [] on purpose, so I could show an example). Somebody could swear a lot with it.

BBCode is canceled if you put BBCode in between letters in the start tags or it is in a code block so

Code:

[ur[b][/b]l=scratch.mit.edu] the scratch website[/url]

would make
[url=scratch.mit.edu] the scratch website[/url] and not the scratch website
and also :[i][/i]) would make :) and not smile

scimonster · 2011-08-25 05:47:34

If you see it, just report it. You know how to report? Read my ITopic in NSM.

Death_Wish · 2011-08-25 06:19:42

scimonster wrote:
If you see it, just report it. You know how to report? Read my ITopic in NSM.

How wouldn't I know, it's very clear how to do it. I've been on other pun-bb forums tongue

And to joefarebrother, I know you can do that. Read the rest of my post xD

bbbeb · 2011-08-25 06:21:36

lilacfuzz101 wrote:
actually... it censors it if you seperate it with tags. So there's not really a need

Hint 1: I was banned for exploiting this glitch.

Hint 2: I can do it right now, but I don't want another ban.

LS97 · 2011-08-25 06:34:46

And do remember that for testing stuff like this there's always the preview feature! wink

scimonster · 2011-08-25 06:47:27

Death_Wish wrote:
scimonster wrote:
If you see it, just report it. You know how to report? Read my ITopic in NSM.
How wouldn't I know, it's very clear how to do it. I've been on other pun-bb forums

Some new Scratchers don't, and I didn't know. tongue You can read it anyways. tongue

lilacfuzz101 wrote:
actually... it censors it if you seperate it with tags. So there's not really a need

Actually... I just tested. It doesn't.

I'll show you with a harmless word that they filtered (for links):
punbb-hosting
punbb-hosting

joefarebrother · 2011-08-26 10:15:35

url and img are disabled for new scratchers because they might post somthing inapropriate. There is no harm done with bold, italic and underlines. This is like saying all bbcode should be disabled for new scratchers. If someone swears, report it. They will get banned.

wisegirl4eva · 2011-08-26 14:14:39

A simalar Thing has happened, Someone Hacked one of my friends. For example, Say Rainbow is a bad word.
They said, R.A.I.N.B.O.W.

See???? :C

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2011-08-21 21:14:44

[b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#2 2011-08-21 21:24:43

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#3 2011-08-21 21:39:19

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

lilacfuzz101 wrote:

#4 2011-08-21 22:22:58

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#5 2011-08-21 23:12:46

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

JJROCKER wrote:

#6 2011-08-21 23:28:13

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#7 2011-08-21 23:32:08

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#8 2011-08-21 23:35:48

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#9 2011-08-21 23:53:07

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

kayybee wrote:

#10 2011-08-22 00:00:53

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#11 2011-08-22 01:53:33

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

Death_Wish wrote:

kayybee wrote:

#12 2011-08-22 10:13:32

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

kayybee wrote:

Death_Wish wrote:

kayybee wrote:

#13 2011-08-22 10:20:29

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

kayybee wrote:

Death_Wish wrote:

kayybee wrote:

#14 2011-08-22 10:26:11

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#15 2011-08-23 17:32:39

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#16 2011-08-24 16:27:08

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#17 2011-08-24 16:29:09

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

ImagineIt wrote:

#18 2011-08-25 05:16:22

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

Death_Wish wrote:

Code:

#19 2011-08-25 05:47:34

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#20 2011-08-25 06:19:42

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

scimonster wrote:

#21 2011-08-25 06:21:36

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

lilacfuzz101 wrote:

#22 2011-08-25 06:34:46

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#23 2011-08-25 06:47:27

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

Death_Wish wrote:

scimonster wrote:

lilacfuzz101 wrote:

#24 2011-08-26 10:15:35

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

#25 2011-08-26 14:14:39

Re: [b][i][u] Disabled for New Scratchers?

Board footer