Topic closed
this is a very good project that is a 200 second song that uses only scratch blocks!u hav to check it out--http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/MyRedNeptune/1959126
Offline
MyRedNeptune wrote:
deatheater wrote:
Anyway, can you pretty please let me live
Well, thanks to that very kind Scratcher above me, you have an extra month. ^^
Yeah, it gives me another month to either
A) Find out how to stop you
B) Find out how to become immortal
or C) Convince you to not kill me
Offline
deatheater wrote:
MyRedNeptune wrote:
deatheater wrote:
Anyway, can you pretty please let me live
Well, thanks to that very kind Scratcher above me, you have an extra month. ^^
Yeah, it gives me another month to either
A) Find out how to stop you
B) Find out how to become immortal
or C) Convince you to not kill me
D) Pray
^^ I'm joking, that won't really help.
Offline
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/bob6/1978732
Hey, lookie! I made part 1 of 12 of the blue danube waltz! do you think this meets standards?
Offline
bob6 wrote:
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/bob6/1978732
Hey, lookie! I made part 1 of 12 of the blue danube waltz! do you think this meets standards?![]()
That is cool, but it should be longer
It's not too hard to make one of 1 minute or less (Well, 1 minute would be good
), but 3 minutes is, well, the name of this thread *{}*

Offline
the reason why I made it 25 seconds, is because there are WAY TOO MANY instruments in it. it gets very laggy. besides, that's just part one. and if you want to talk about it, talk about it here: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=71803
Offline
bob6 wrote:
the reason why I made it 25 seconds, is because there are WAY TOO MANY instruments in it. it gets very laggy. besides, that's just part one. and if you want to talk about it, talk about it here: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=71803
Maybe that's just your computer. Have you tried running the project on other machines? There are a lot of projects on Scratch which have a lot more sprites and scripts than yours, yet they seem to run just fine.
Offline
bob6 wrote:
the reason why I made it 25 seconds, is because there are WAY TOO MANY instruments in it. it gets very laggy. besides, that's just part one. and if you want to talk about it, talk about it here: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=71803
I've made music projects with more than 20 instruments without lag, so maybe it is just your computer, like MRN said
Also, I think it's pretty good so far, can't wait for the other 11 parts ^^
Last edited by deatheater (2011-08-15 01:30:22)
Offline
deatheater wrote:
bob6 wrote:
the reason why I made it 25 seconds, is because there are WAY TOO MANY instruments in it. it gets very laggy. besides, that's just part one. and if you want to talk about it, talk about it here: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=71803
I've made music projects with more than 20 instruments without lag, so maybe it is just your computer, like MRN said
Also, I think it's pretty good so far, can't wait for the other 11 parts ^^
Yeah, check out deatheater's music projects btw. They're good. xP
This post isn't actually a compliment. It's just a cleverly disguised bump.
Offline
MyRedNeptune wrote:
deatheater wrote:
bob6 wrote:
the reason why I made it 25 seconds, is because there are WAY TOO MANY instruments in it. it gets very laggy. besides, that's just part one. and if you want to talk about it, talk about it here: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=71803
I've made music projects with more than 20 instruments without lag, so maybe it is just your computer, like MRN said
Also, I think it's pretty good so far, can't wait for the other 11 parts ^^Yeah, check out deatheater's music projects btw. They're good. xP
This post isn't actually a compliment. It's just a cleverly disguised bump.
I shall still take it as a compliment anyway ^^
Offline
Topic closed