Scratch

16Skittles wrote:

calebxy wrote:

GarSkutherGirl wrote:

And this is the theory SPORE uses, but I have a feeling they're ALL correct.

So, my theory:

Amino acids and the other molecules used to create life came from space. Then, they all came together at one point, creating the perfect sample of prehistoric DNA, therefore creating life.

My point is, that's extremely unlikely to happen, because you'd first need ALL 20 amino acids, and they'd also need to be in the right order.

but who says that the order from when life was started is the same as it is now? If evolution is true, there is no reason why life couldn't have started as a HORRIBLY inefficient form, just barely capable of survival. then, it started to mutate itself into better, more effective forms.

Also, just saying this for thought: (Mods, if you find this removable, just snip this off)
If God created the universe, then what created God? And if God could have always been there, why couldn't the universe have always been there?

Scientists have worked out that the Universe had a beginning (hence the Big Bang theory (not the TV show)). One of the theories is that there were particles that have always been there (or maybe were the remains of a previous Universe), and they were what caused the Big Bang. So, scientists seem fine with the idea that something was always there. So I ask you: What was it!?! That's the question. So I examine the evidence, ask myself such questions as "could this really have come about by chance?" and come to a reasonable conclusion.

GarSkutherGirl wrote:

calebxy wrote:

helltank wrote:

Probably, because as a a last resort, you can always claim God started evolution. Meaning,"He wouldn't have created us like that... you must help yourself... he probably created single celled forms and Earth, and wanted to see if we would survive."

But that's talking about God. 

My theory has always been God started it and SLOWLY morphed us into humans over the millions of years.

My theory is that we were simply created by a creature's 5D thoughts, powerful enough to create a universe.

777w wrote:

spongebob123 wrote:

GarSkutherGirl wrote:

My theory has always been God started it and SLOWLY morphed us into humans over the millions of years.

My theory is that we were simply created by a creature's 5D thoughts, powerful enough to create a universe.

My theory is that the universe is just HERE.
AND ALSO THAT THE SIXTY SECOND RULE IS WHAT INSPIRED THE CHRISTIANS TO THINK UP THE DEVIL.

The Sixty Second Rule can time travel! 

777w wrote:

calebxy wrote:

777w wrote:

My theory is that the universe is just HERE.
AND ALSO THAT THE SIXTY SECOND RULE IS WHAT INSPIRED THE CHRISTIANS TO THINK UP THE DEVIL.

The Sixty Second Rule can time travel! 

The sixty second rule probably created all evil.

We're on to you, Sixty Second Rule!
[/off-topic]

16Skittles wrote:

calebxy wrote:

16Skittles wrote:

But who says that the order from when life was started is the same as it is now? If evolution is true, there is no reason why life couldn't have started as a HORRIBLY inefficient form, just barely capable of survival. then, it started to mutate itself into better, more effective forms.

It doesn't work like that. Imagine a Lego brick. Okay, done that? That's a protein. Those Lego bricks make up cells (the most basic form of of life). If you don't have the proteins, then you don't have a cell. Simple.

where is your proof that cells weren't made of different proteins than they are today?

These are the very basic building blocks of life. Sure, more complicated things like, for instance, cells might change. But the building blocks don't.

Last edited by calebxy (2011-07-31 13:54:34)

TinyTorchic22 wrote:

ONCE UPON A TIME A BUNCH OF CELLS GOT STUCK TOGETHER AND SUDDENLY SPLIT AND MADE BABIES AND THEN THEY CHANGED SHAPE UNTIL THEY GOT TO THE HUMAN SHAPE THE END

[/topic]

Why, exactly, is that the end of the topic?

somebody would probably start a conversation (aka flame war) about god or the bible.

imnotbob wrote:

somebody would probably start a conversation (aka flame war) about god or the bible.

I'll make sure that doesn't happen.

PandaGuy wrote:

jackrulez wrote:

GarSkutherGirl wrote:

My theory has always been God started it and SLOWLY morphed us into humans over the millions of years.

+1

-1

Someone hasn't done their research. 

 
What does that mean? Do you not believe in evolution?

littletonkslover wrote:

i'm a christian and believe in evolution


i don't think you have to think in one concrete way or the other

(remember, don't discuss the Bible too much. That's not what this is about)

Well, the Bible actually says that God created all life "according to their kinds." Which, while leaving room for variety (just think about how many different types of dogs there are), means that things can't change into a different species (like a dog turning into a cat), because they are still all in their kinds.

calebxy wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

i'm a christian and believe in evolution


i don't think you have to think in one concrete way or the other

(remember, don't discuss the Bible too much. That's not what this is about)

Well, the Bible actually says that God created all life "according to their kinds." Which, while leaving room for variety (just think about how many different types of dogs there are), means that things can't change into a different species (like a dog turning into a cat), because they are still all in their kinds.

not necessarily


aren't we all one?

all of us are living creatures, sharing the world together?

i like to think beyond the written words to their actual meaning o:

calebxy wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

calebxy wrote:

(remember, don't discuss the Bible too much. That's not what this is about)

Well, the Bible actually says that God created all life "according to their kinds." Which, while leaving room for variety (just think about how many different types of dogs there are), means that things can't change into a different species (like a dog turning into a cat), because they are still all in their kinds.

not necessarily


aren't we all one?

all of us are living creatures, sharing the world together?

i like to think beyond the written words to their actual meaning o:

We're all living, yes, but the Bible makes clear distinction between the different animals.

like i said, what you believe is what you believe ^^

you can't have someone else tell you what you believe if you don't believe it. it's not believable// or is it?


okay a tad repetitive there sorry

calebxy wrote:

tomicool wrote:

That's like saying "let's make a topic about *insert political party here*". Let's remember, anyone can view it, of any age, any religous views or any political views. Because of this, it's bound to get interupted and ruined.

No, we're discussing science, not religion.

As long as the conversation remains respectful and focused on the science of the theory, we'll leave it open and see how it goes