Scratch

imnotbob · 2011-07-28 17:38:16

ok...

brettman98 wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
brettman98 wrote:

I'm actually serious.
...

well, there are a few things that are impossible. like living and never eating
Not in the recesses of your mind.

brettman98 · 2011-07-28 17:40:20

imnotbob wrote:
ok...
brettman98 wrote:
imnotbob wrote:

...

well, there are a few things that are impossible. like living and never eating
Not in the recesses of your mind.

I apologize that you do not understand such out of the box philosophy.

imnotbob · 2011-07-28 17:43:45

brettman98 wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
ok...
brettman98 wrote:

Not in the recesses of your mind.
I apologize that you do not understand such out of the box philosophy.

roll

im a very out of the box person. doesnt mean i have to understand everything.

Rexpup · 2011-07-28 18:06:03

brettman98 wrote:
TinyTorchic22 wrote:
agscratcher wrote:

http://www.mtv.com/onair/the_hills/seas … fb_01a.jpg
I don't get it.

@brettman: FFFFFF----

People don't get it. That's not what's going to happen unless they WANT it to. ¬_¬
FFFFF----

You don't get it. Building intelligence is a dangerous game.

It's not.

brettman98 · 2011-07-28 18:06:11

imnotbob wrote:
brettman98 wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
ok...

I apologize that you do not understand such out of the box philosophy.

im a very out of the box person. doesnt mean i have to understand everything.

no, I meant no offense.
I'm just saying you are not comprehending philosophy.

GarSkutherGirl · 2011-07-28 18:13:38

Actually, is it possible to get back on topic?

To Aperture being real from philosophy.

imnotbob · 2011-07-28 18:21:03

brettman98 wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
brettman98 wrote:

I apologize that you do not understand such out of the box philosophy.

im a very out of the box person. doesnt mean i have to understand everything.
no, I meant no offense.
I'm just saying you are not comprehending philosophy.

oh.

not to be rude, (and im not insulted by u saying no offense) but didnt u get upset when someone said no offense?

GarSkutherGirl · 2011-07-28 18:28:09

legorulez101 · 2011-07-28 18:30:39

I admit, I don't like Portal.
But having a portal gun in real life would pwn!

brettman98 · 2011-07-28 18:31:37

imnotbob wrote:
brettman98 wrote:
imnotbob wrote:

im a very out of the box person. doesnt mean i have to understand everything.
no, I meant no offense.
I'm just saying you are not comprehending philosophy.
oh.

not to be rude, (and im not insulted by u saying no offense) but didnt u get upset when someone said no offense?

not really upset, more like annoyed.
I used no offense because I had lack of a better word.

imnotbob · 2011-07-28 18:32:41

brettman98 wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
brettman98 wrote:
no, I meant no offense.
I'm just saying you are not comprehending philosophy.
oh.

not to be rude, (and im not insulted by u saying no offense) but didnt u get upset when someone said no offense?
not really upset, more like annoyed.
I used no offense because I had lack of a better word.

oh. ok then

lets get ontopic now

GarSkutherGirl · 2011-07-28 18:33:51

SpriteMaster wrote:
Especially GLaDOS2. Always a tiny: ...this was a triumph.... at the end of a post. XP

*insert ragequit here*

Nexstudent · 2011-07-28 18:34:11

Its nice to see something usually trolled about or annoyingly used being used in a productive way.

I'm sure we will have this techinology some day. The world has a lot of brilliant minds, although there a lot of non-brilliant minds, we can all stick together to make a modern dream a reality.

imnotbob · 2011-07-28 18:35:54

GarSkutherGirl wrote:
SpriteMaster wrote:
Especially GLaDOS2. Always a tiny: ...this was a triumph.... at the end of a post. XP
*insert ragequit here*

GarSkutherGirl · 2011-07-28 18:36:56

Nexstudent wrote:
Its nice to see something usually trolled about or annoyingly used being used in a productive way.

I'm sure we will have this techinology some day. The world has a lot of brilliant minds, although there a lot of non-brilliant minds, we can all stick together to make a modern dream a reality.

THANK YOU FOR NOT BEING A JERK TO THIS THREAD.

[insert happy face here]
[insert anti-ragequit here]

Last edited by GarSkutherGirl (2011-07-28 18:37:26)

SpriteMaster · 2011-07-28 18:37:09

legorulez101 wrote:
I admit, I don't like Portal.
But having a portal gun in real life would pwn!

pikachu1337 · 2011-07-28 18:38:53

GLaDOS2 wrote:
I bet this might actually happen, but the people at Aperture were stupid to have NEUROTOXIN there. Who's stupid idea was that?!

This.

GarSkutherGirl · 2011-07-28 19:00:53

Back onto topic, I want P-Body in real life. Yay homework buddies!

Then I can get away with using a calculator. xD

Also, P0RTAL haters,
Look down here, past the edit:
VV

Last edited by GarSkutherGirl (2011-07-28 19:18:49)

SeptimusHeap · 2011-07-28 19:53:23

I'm not a hater. Portal 2 is my 2nd favorite game! I dislike the obsessive fanbase (you, GLaDOS2) I mean really. Too many references and posts that were funny the first 1000000 times. I mean who beleaves or finds it funny that GLaDOS2 says that she's GLaDOS. This isn't a RPG...

Last edited by SeptimusHeap (2011-07-28 20:15:01)

GarSkutherGirl · 2011-07-28 20:25:09

SeptimusHeap wrote:
I'm not a hater. Portal 2 is my 2nd favorite game! I dislike the obsessive fanbase (you, GLaDOS2) I mean really. Too many references and posts that were funny the first 1000000 times. I mean who beleaves or finds it funny that GLaDOS2 says that she's GLaDOS. This isn't a RPG...

Please stop. We get it already, everyone hates her. >n<

But I don't......

(I just KNOW this'll turn into a creepypasta.)

EDIT:

It's less gruesome than the original....

Last edited by GarSkutherGirl (2011-07-28 20:29:35)

randomnumber53 · 2011-07-28 20:35:07

I think it might take a bit more than 11 years before teleportation is invented...

GarSkutherGirl · 2011-07-28 20:41:00

randomnumber53 wrote:
I think it might take a bit more than 11 years before teleportation is invented...

My little sister isn't exactly the GREATEST at numbers. xD

soupoftomato · 2011-07-28 20:55:31

Rexpup wrote:
Well, everyone in the 50's thought that we would all have personal androids and flying cars by now, but all we got were cell phones.

We only have cell phones. People didn't understand that you had to take "baby steps" to get new technology. I can't just say, "I am going to build a C3-P0 for real". I have to make a plan, prototype things. Make little models.
People though that a space station was silly, and we should just send people to pluto. Leaps fail. And when they did, people got discouraged, and quit. No flying cars.
Find the Potential: The International Space Station can go to Mars in 3 weeks. It has enough fuel to make a round trip. It is capable of holding food and water for that trip. Then Why, you ask, have we not gone to Mars? Lack of vision. People don't get it.
For these resons, I belive that those technologies will not be real soon.

Back then Transportation was the thing being most developed. So yes, they expected the trend of that advancement to continue but instead we explored communication.

GarSkutherGirl · 2011-07-29 14:29:32

soupoftomato wrote:
Rexpup wrote:
Well, everyone in the 50's thought that we would all have personal androids and flying cars by now, but all we got were cell phones.

We only have cell phones. People didn't understand that you had to take "baby steps" to get new technology. I can't just say, "I am going to build a C3-P0 for real". I have to make a plan, prototype things. Make little models.
People though that a space station was silly, and we should just send people to pluto. Leaps fail. And when they did, people got discouraged, and quit. No flying cars.
Find the Potential: The International Space Station can go to Mars in 3 weeks. It has enough fuel to make a round trip. It is capable of holding food and water for that trip. Then Why, you ask, have we not gone to Mars? Lack of vision. People don't get it.
For these resons, I belive that those technologies will not be real soon.
Back then Transportation was the thing being most developed. So yes, they expected the trend of that advancement to continue but instead we explored communication.

This.

08jackt · 2011-07-29 14:33:21

PW132 wrote:
And then GLaDOS kills all the employees and their daughters. Brilliant.

Scratch

archived forums

#26 2011-07-28 17:38:16

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

brettman98 wrote:

imnotbob wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

#27 2011-07-28 17:40:20

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

imnotbob wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

imnotbob wrote:

#28 2011-07-28 17:43:45

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

brettman98 wrote:

imnotbob wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

#29 2011-07-28 18:06:03

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

brettman98 wrote:

TinyTorchic22 wrote:

agscratcher wrote:

#30 2011-07-28 18:06:11

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

imnotbob wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

imnotbob wrote:

#31 2011-07-28 18:13:38

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

#32 2011-07-28 18:21:03

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

brettman98 wrote:

imnotbob wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

#33 2011-07-28 18:28:09

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

#34 2011-07-28 18:30:39

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

#35 2011-07-28 18:31:37

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

imnotbob wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

imnotbob wrote:

#36 2011-07-28 18:32:41

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

brettman98 wrote:

imnotbob wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

#37 2011-07-28 18:33:51

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

SpriteMaster wrote:

#38 2011-07-28 18:34:11

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

#39 2011-07-28 18:35:54

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

GarSkutherGirl wrote:

SpriteMaster wrote:

#40 2011-07-28 18:36:56

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

Nexstudent wrote:

#41 2011-07-28 18:37:09

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

legorulez101 wrote:

#42 2011-07-28 18:38:53

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

GLaDOS2 wrote:

#43 2011-07-28 19:00:53

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

#44 2011-07-28 19:53:23

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

#45 2011-07-28 20:25:09

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

SeptimusHeap wrote:

#46 2011-07-28 20:35:07

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

#47 2011-07-28 20:41:00

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.

randomnumber53 wrote:

#48 2011-07-28 20:55:31

Re: I know why Aperture Science isn't real, and maybe it will be someday.