Okay, I know this post will immediately be spammed by idiots and raging kiddies, "OMG U SUC SRYSLY WE DNT ANOTHER MINCRAFT TOPIC!!!!?!?!?!" but seriously, I need to clarify something. MINECRAFT DOESN'T HAVE BAD GRAPHICS. It's a common mistake, but Minecraft is actually something like 720 or 1080p. The graphics are very good, but the ART style looks pixely, so people think the graphics are bad. Art and graphics are two very different things. If Minecraft had bad graphics, the angles on blocks would look choppy. Do they? No.
That concludes what I have to say, and if you might want to argue with me, know this: You're WRONG.
AH RAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you.
EDIT: Hey mods, could you close this topic? I was right, those kiddies did start raging, and the argument is really heated.
EDIT: Also, imnotbob, stop trolling for a minute and listen to me. Minecraft having good graphics isn't an opinion, say it is one is kind of like saying: "It's MY opinion this TV is HD, so if you don't think so, shut up." You might not like the ART style, but that doesn't make Minecraft have bad graphics. If you read this, THANK YOU.
Last edited by degscratcher (2011-07-25 16:39:47)
Offline
Gud Joob.
orsomething
Last edited by 777w (2011-07-24 07:23:57)
Offline
777w wrote:
Gud Joob.
orsomething
Gud 4 yu.
I HATE 60 SECOND RULE!
Offline
degscratcher wrote:
I HATE 60 SECOND RULE!
We NEED to team up.
Offline
777w wrote:
degscratcher wrote:
I HATE 60 SECOND RULE!
We NEED to team up.
XD
Offline
*facepalm* everybody has opinions. so keep urs and get over that fact that somebody doesnt agree PLEASE!
thank you!
degscratcher wrote:
You're WRONG.
OPINION. GET. THE. %@*$. OVER. IT.
Last edited by imnotbob (2011-07-24 13:35:55)
Offline
imnotbob wrote:
*facepalm* everybody has opinions. so keep urs and get over that fact that somebody doesnt agree PLEASE!
thank you!degscratcher wrote:
You're WRONG.
OPINION. GET. THE. %@*$. OVER. IT.
Uh... there's one problem Mr. Troll Bob No Pants: Minecraft having good graphics is not my OPINION. It's a fact.
Offline
degscratcher wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
*facepalm* everybody has opinions. so keep urs and get over that fact that somebody doesnt agree PLEASE!
thank you!degscratcher wrote:
You're WRONG.
OPINION. GET. THE. %@*$. OVER. IT.
Uh... there's one problem Mr. Troll Bob No Pants: Minecraft having good graphics is not my OPINION. It's a fact.
Actually that is an opinion.
Offline
msdosdude wrote:
degscratcher wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
*facepalm* everybody has opinions. so keep urs and get over that fact that somebody doesnt agree PLEASE!
thank you!
OPINION. GET. THE. %@*$. OVER. IT.Uh... there's one problem Mr. Troll Bob No Pants: Minecraft having good graphics is not my OPINION. It's a fact.
Actually that is an opinion.
![]()
Well yes, people can have opinions about whether minecraft has good graphics or not, but the FACT is it does.
Offline
degscratcher wrote:
msdosdude wrote:
degscratcher wrote:
Uh... there's one problem Mr. Troll Bob No Pants: Minecraft having good graphics is not my OPINION. It's a fact.Actually that is an opinion.
![]()
Well yes, people can have opinions about whether minecraft has good graphics or not, but the FACT is it does.
It has good GRAPHICS. It may or may not have good ART
Offline
gbear605 wrote:
degscratcher wrote:
msdosdude wrote:
Actually that is an opinion.![]()
Well yes, people can have opinions about whether minecraft has good graphics or not, but the FACT is it does.
It has good GRAPHICS. It may or may not have good ART
This. All you other argument starters are going to get this topic closed.
Offline
I've tried classic (for free in my browser) and I have found that the resolution is great, the graphics are good... but the cubes could do with a tad more detail
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
I've tried classic (for free in my browser) and I have found that the resolution is great, the graphics are good... but the cubes could do with a tad more detail
![]()
No.
Say that and you're a non-believer.
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
I've tried classic (for free in my browser) and I have found that the resolution is great, the graphics are good... but the cubes could do with a tad more detail
![]()
No.
Say that and you're a non-believer.
I don't understand?
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
I've tried classic (for free in my browser) and I have found that the resolution is great, the graphics are good... but the cubes could do with a tad more detail
![]()
No.
Say that and you're a non-believer.I don't understand?
![]()
We neeeeeeeed 16-bit graphics.
Imagine good looking cubes. Ugh. Minecraft is a game about SQUARES made up of SMALLER SQUARES.
Consider yourself knowledgeable.
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
No.
Say that and you're a non-believer.I don't understand?
![]()
We neeeeeeeed 16-bit graphics.
Imagine good looking cubes. Ugh. Minecraft is a game about SQUARES made up of SMALLER SQUARES.
Consider yourself knowledgeable.
Please clarify?
I don't have much experience with minecraft... but I understand its a building game with cubes?
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
I don't understand?
![]()
We neeeeeeeed 16-bit graphics.
Imagine good looking cubes. Ugh. Minecraft is a game about SQUARES made up of SMALLER SQUARES.
Consider yourself knowledgeable.Please clarify?
I don't have much experience with minecraft... but I understand its a building game with cubes?
Teh cubes, no need the bettah detail.
AKA I'm so used to them I wouldn't get used to it if it changed.
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
I've tried classic (for free in my browser) and I have found that the resolution is great, the graphics are good... but the cubes could do with a tad more detail
![]()
If you ever get the full version, you can always mod it and download a higher resolution texture pack. Personally, I'm fine with the resolution of the textures as they are, although it makes making custom skins a bit difficult because you don't have much to work with.
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
I've tried classic (for free in my browser) and I have found that the resolution is great, the graphics are good... but the cubes could do with a tad more detail
![]()
Beta has much better graphics, you should look up a picture of it.
Offline
degscratcher wrote:
msdosdude wrote:
degscratcher wrote:
Uh... there's one problem Mr. Troll Bob No Pants: Minecraft having good graphics is not my OPINION. It's a fact.Actually that is an opinion.
![]()
Well yes, people can have opinions about whether minecraft has good graphics or not, but the FACT is it does.
that's not a FACT. people can think it doesnt and it does.
and...
degscratcher wrote:
Mr. Troll Bob No Pants
IM the troll for getting highly annoyed with YOU. "youre WRONG" "graphics r EPIC" "everyone who doesnt agree with me and gets highly annoyed is (apparently) going to be called a troll"
Offline
I have this 256x256 HD texturepack and alot of 128x128 and 64x64 HD texturepacks, but I only use the 256x256 pack on special occasions because if I play it too long it wipes out my MC memory

Offline
imnotbob wrote:
degscratcher wrote:
msdosdude wrote:
Actually that is an opinion.![]()
Well yes, people can have opinions about whether minecraft has good graphics or not, but the FACT is it does.
that's not a FACT. people can think it doesnt and it does.
and...degscratcher wrote:
Mr. Troll Bob No Pants
IM the troll for getting highly annoyed with YOU. "youre WRONG" "graphics r EPIC" "everyone who doesnt agree with me and gets highly annoyed is (apparently) going to be called a troll"
I'm ROFLing. That spelling looks closer to yours then mine. Plus, even if spelled correctly, I never even said, "Graphics are epic." And yes, you are a troll. I state a fact: Minecraft has good graphics, and you say, "TATS AN OPINON, SHUT UP AND DON'T RAGE". I don't get you.
Offline
degscratcher wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
degscratcher wrote:
Well yes, people can have opinions about whether minecraft has good graphics or not, but the FACT is it does.
that's not a FACT. people can think it doesnt and it does.
and...degscratcher wrote:
Mr. Troll Bob No Pants
IM the troll for getting highly annoyed with YOU. "youre WRONG" "graphics r EPIC" "everyone who doesnt agree with me and gets highly annoyed is (apparently) going to be called a troll"
I'm ROFLing. That spelling looks closer to yours then mine. Plus, even if spelled correctly, I never even said, "Graphics are epic." And yes, you are a troll. I state a fact: Minecraft has good graphics, and you say, "TATS AN OPINON, SHUT UP AND DON'T RAGE". I don't get you.
wow. just wow. does spelling even MATTER? thats not the subject at hand! and i know you didnt REALLY say that, but thats the message ur sending out.
you know, calling ppl a troll is very trollish.
ITS NOT A FACT. YOU CAN THINK IT DOES, OTHER PPL CAN THINK NOT! ok?! and, i dont say "tats" and i never say "DONT RAGE". you're the one who "loled at my raging." me disagreeing and getting mad doesnt make me a troll.
Harakou wrote:
trolling - the act of purposefully antagonizing other people on the internet, generally on message boards.
and you're trying to do this arent you?
Last edited by imnotbob (2011-07-25 19:10:40)
Offline