Scratch

DarkerWorld wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

DarkerWorld wrote:

Science hasn't proven magic isn't real, unless I'm mistaken.

+1

I mean, you cannot prove it doesn't exist.

Yeah, its just like you can't prove ghosts don't exist, or flying feet don't exist.

yes. although flying feet would be impractical and inconvienent.

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

Okay, listen up people. I'm sick of the criticism. I am a Harry Potter fanish...and I am a Twilight fanish... I think that you all who were being critics on my reply is plain stupid!!! I was only answering someone, some people were also off topic so please don't give me this *!! Seriously? Do both Hp and Twi fans exist? Your acting like its a big competition and that Twi and HP are against each other. Both worlds don't mix, that's why its not called Twipotter or whatever. If they were ever to come in a fight than wopdee do, that's really not going to happen because no one knows the actual answer. If they make a movie on Edward against Harry Potter than you can prove me wrong but I don't see that in the movie list. Yes, Harry Potter is more popular. Because it is aimed for kids, teens, and some adults. Twilight is aimed for young couples, Teen chicks, Teen couples, and some kids. It is meant for being a love action movie. Mostly with love. Harry Potter does have love thickly involved in it. But HArry Potter was also meant for magic entertainment. That is my input!    Don't miss understand me, I have nothing against anything here!    (except for the critisim) Thank you and have a good night or day, where ever you may live.

Well, t we didn't respond because were supposed to I don't know, debate here.

I found an old Inspiration & More topic everyone here should read    Here we go

Trekkie210 wrote:

helltank wrote:

Why is everyone so obsessed over the sparkling thing?

I, for one, firmly believe both magic and vampires exist. And for all we know, they do sparkle, and Dracula was written by a guy who simply had a good imagination. Also, for all we know, such things as Horcruxes exist!

HP and Twilight can be friends. Learn from MLP:FIM

Love and tolerance all the way.

Then it would be:"Aww... who is cuter? Liddle babeh Harry or cutie pie Edward? debate thread.

Harry Potter wins hand down. I see millions of Harry Potter Parodies and no Twilight Parodies. Parodies determine popularity guys.

The Harry Potter movie that made the LEAST amount of money still made $90 million  more than the Twilight movie that made the MOST amount of money. Also Harry Potter pwned Voldemort, Voldemort pwned Cedric Diggory, Cedric Diggory = Edward Cullen. Therefore Harry Potter pwns Edward Cullen. Oh! Pwnage! 

helltank wrote:

At least JK Rowling can write a book without saying the same thing twice every page *OMG EDWARD IS GORGEOU--Yeah, we don't care.

"OMG TWILIGHT SUC--" Yeah, we don't care.

So basically, in saying that, you mean you don't care Twilight sucks and like it anyway? 

i love both
kinda fitting pic:

Last edited by imnotbob (2011-07-28 10:44:13)

imsosuperswell1 wrote:

Twilight will never become a classic.

This.

Last edited by GLaDOS2 (2011-07-28 11:05:45)

You guys no that vampires Sparkle to avoid Edward *gasp* NOT being a Mary-Sue? I mean, why have the possibility or the danger of a character actually having a FLAW? It's unthinkable! What type of person has FLAWS? I mean where's the drama and tensity and having someone that could die at any moment? It's much more serious if he sparkles instead. It all ends up better this way!

cheddargirl wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

Put it all here I guess since we've been driven out of the thread we were using and I like debating this. 

So which is better and why?

I think it depends on what the user is interested in. ^^

You know I'd like to see someone who is both a Harry Potter and Twilight fan to give his/her point of view. Less bias ftw. 

Get my mom ^^

helltank wrote:

soupoftomato, cancem, GLADOS2 and Swell....

[Elder Swear]

Nice to no you swear at us instead of answering to the argument.