Scratch

icerosethecat · 2011-07-17 12:39:26

gerbils800 wrote:
Twilight is kind of dumb...my opinion...

FACT. There are a few MATURE Twilight fans (they are an endangered species, my friend is one of them, BTW) that could argue against that.

As anyone else here noticed how most Twilight fans seem to have had the part of their brains that control literacy removed?

icerosethecat · 2011-07-17 12:41:58

gerbils800 wrote:
DarkerWorld wrote:
Actress playing Ginny is engaged to a Twilight actor

WHICH ONE???? Pleasedon'tbeEdwardpleasepleasePLEASE

DarkerWorld · 2011-07-17 12:57:47

Bonnie Wright (Ginny) is engaged to Jamie Campbell, who is a Twilight actor. Jamie Campbell also played Gellert Grindelwald in Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows Part 1.

soupoftomato · 2011-07-17 14:35:38

Guys, geez, stop butthurting over the joking title of the thread. IT IS A FACT that more people went to see HP7 at midnight than Twilight.

@That spongebob dude: Oh come on these movies would SUCK if they were all happiness and glitter. If you want to see sparkles join the Twihards. tongue

bananaman114 · 2011-07-17 14:56:00

I have a friend who likes Twilight. big_smile
I like Harry Potter, and I haven't read Twiliht or any of the likes thereof, nor have I seen the movies.

sparks · 2011-07-17 14:58:17

I personally prefer HP to Twilight. I think that twilight is generally preferred more by girls and since there is quite a minority of them on Scratch I think this thread is going to greatly favour HP tongue

I'm disappointed that they're splitting the last twilight book into two parts, it's all about money making, just like the harry potter finale sad

soupoftomato · 2011-07-17 15:01:52

sparks wrote:
I personally prefer HP to Twilight. I think that twilight is generally preferred more by girls and since there is quite a minority of them on Scratch I think this thread is going to greatly favour HP

I'm disappointed that they're splitting the last twilight book into two parts, it's all about money making, just like the harry potter finale

Honestly, it felt like splitting into two parts was copying Harry Potter a lot.

Both of the new Harry Potters (made for story or money or not) were great, but that just doesn't make sense or translate into Twilight.

SuperYoshiluver13 · 2011-07-17 15:06:30

pikachu1337 wrote:
SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
Okay, sure Harry Potter is cool has little wands with cool spells and awesome battles but Twilight is a romantic action movie. Some boys may not like the shirtless Jacob or the close contact Edward but that doesn't mean that but Harry Potter has become more unpopular over the years. My friend and a lot of other people loved Harry Potter when it came out but over the years the people got tired of it. Yes, I have seen the movies, and I'm going to watch the Twilight movies. But an outbreak of girls would go to Twilight and since half of the world is men, some single men wouldn't want to see vampire movies with romance. Of course they'd pick Harry Potter or Transformers (which was a really AWSUM movie!!!). My point is Twilight may be unpopular to boys and some girls but that doesn't make it unpopular to most Twilight loving girls.
oh, so a girl falling in love with a vampire FOR THAT REASON ENTIRELY then them both almost dying a lot is better than something with actual plot? Pshh. Sure, the shirtless scenes help the movie's sales, but A MOVIE THAT NEEDS THOSE TO GAIN VIEWERS ISN'T GOOD IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Okay, the shirtless scenes isn't really the ONLY thing that brings people in. Why do you like Harry Potter? Because it has cool effects! We are all evenly matched here no matter what you all say! And of course another reason why Harry Potter has more views is because there's like seven movies and twilight has like four or five. Its a good movie and I don't want to argue. And I'm not saying Harry Potter is bad. Harry Potter is a very well-thought out movie, I'm just defending the rights of Twilight. Thank you.

brettman98 · 2011-07-17 17:07:33

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
pikachu1337 wrote:
SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
Okay, sure Harry Potter is cool has little wands with cool spells and awesome battles but Twilight is a romantic action movie. Some boys may not like the shirtless Jacob or the close contact Edward but that doesn't mean that but Harry Potter has become more unpopular over the years. My friend and a lot of other people loved Harry Potter when it came out but over the years the people got tired of it. Yes, I have seen the movies, and I'm going to watch the Twilight movies. But an outbreak of girls would go to Twilight and since half of the world is men, some single men wouldn't want to see vampire movies with romance. Of course they'd pick Harry Potter or Transformers (which was a really AWSUM movie!!!). My point is Twilight may be unpopular to boys and some girls but that doesn't make it unpopular to most Twilight loving girls.
oh, so a girl falling in love with a vampire FOR THAT REASON ENTIRELY then them both almost dying a lot is better than something with actual plot? Pshh. Sure, the shirtless scenes help the movie's sales, but A MOVIE THAT NEEDS THOSE TO GAIN VIEWERS ISN'T GOOD IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Okay, the shirtless scenes isn't really the ONLY thing that brings people in. Why do you like Harry Potter? Because it has cool effects! We are all evenly matched here no matter what you all say! And of course another reason why Harry Potter has more views is because there's like seven movies and twilight has like four or five. Its a good movie and I don't want to argue. And I'm not saying Harry Potter is bad. Harry Potter is a very well-thought out movie, I'm just defending the rights of Twilight. Thank you.

Funny, but you can really stop joking now neutral

soupoftomato · 2011-07-17 17:15:14

THIS TOPIC WAS NOT MADE TO DEBATE TWILIGHT!!!

YES I POKED FUN AT IT IN THE TOPIC BUT STILL!!!l1!!!

SuperYoshiluver13 · 2011-07-17 17:16:55

brettman98 wrote:
SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
pikachu1337 wrote:

oh, so a girl falling in love with a vampire FOR THAT REASON ENTIRELY then them both almost dying a lot is better than something with actual plot? Pshh. Sure, the shirtless scenes help the movie's sales, but A MOVIE THAT NEEDS THOSE TO GAIN VIEWERS ISN'T GOOD IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Okay, the shirtless scenes isn't really the ONLY thing that brings people in. Why do you like Harry Potter? Because it has cool effects! We are all evenly matched here no matter what you all say! And of course another reason why Harry Potter has more views is because there's like seven movies and twilight has like four or five. Its a good movie and I don't want to argue. And I'm not saying Harry Potter is bad. Harry Potter is a very well-thought out movie, I'm just defending the rights of Twilight. Thank you.
Funny, but you can really stop joking now

I go in there to see the vampires, the romance, the story, not everyone wants to see Taylor shirtless. I mean that's not the main reason why I want to see Twilight now seriously, stop being rude to movies, this can be very offensive to a certain 10 million people!

spongebob123 · 2011-07-17 17:22:44

soupoftomato wrote:
Guys, geez, stop butthurting over the joking title of the thread. IT IS A FACT that more people went to see HP7 at midnight than Twilight.

@That spongebob dude: Oh come on these movies would SUCK if they were all happiness and glitter. If you want to see sparkles join the Twihards.

I just wanted to see the whimsical IMAGINATION that was in the first 2 movies, I'm not asking for My Little Potter (no offense, bronies.)

Oh and,

FOR THE LAST TIME, I AM A FEMALE

Last edited by spongebob123 (2011-07-17 17:24:30)

samurai768 · 2011-07-17 17:23:20

Since the latest of both of these movies came out, my mom is Twihard and my best friend is a Harry-maniac xD

Onyxsbayne · 2011-07-17 17:24:51

SuperYoshiluver13 · 2011-07-17 17:36:52

:l You guys just can't take the truth...

soupoftomato · 2011-07-17 17:37:57

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
:l You guys just can't take the truth...

Lolwut.

What is this truth.

You realize these sales numbers are for ONE MOVIE, not the whole series right? The more books/movies arguement is invalid.

There is SACRIFICE for loved ones in Harry Potter. The romance argument is invalid.

And the twilight books were based on Stephanie Meyers dream. Robert Pattinson doesn't like the books. (He said he felt like he was reading her love fantasy)

And as for popularity, there's just more appeal in Harry Potter. Branching out away from just teenage girls and middle-aged moms.

Last edited by soupoftomato (2011-07-17 17:43:46)

SuperYoshiluver13 · 2011-07-17 17:41:17

icerosethecat wrote:
gerbils800 wrote:
Twilight is kind of dumb...my opinion...
FACT. There are a few MATURE Twilight fans (they are an endangered species, my friend is one of them, BTW) that could argue against that.

As anyone else here noticed how most Twilight fans seem to have had the part of their brains that control literacy removed?

The top part IS true!!! More kids would see Harry Potter because its more of a magicy kids/teenish thing.

SuperYoshiluver13 · 2011-07-17 17:43:03

soupoftomato wrote:
SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
:l You guys just can't take the truth...
Lolwut.

We are evenly matched and no, I'm not joking. I'm defending my territory. Yes, I like Harry Potter, I'm not against it. I'm defending what I love, just the same as you all are!

GravityCatisalie · 2011-07-17 17:45:19

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
more unpopular

Wut.

SuperYoshiluver13 · 2011-07-17 17:45:23

soupoftomato wrote:
SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
:l You guys just can't take the truth...
Lolwut.

What is this truth.

You realize these sales numbers are for ONE MOVIE, not the whole series right? The more books/movies arguement is invalid.

There is SACRIFICE for loved ones in Harry Potter. The romance argument is invalid.

And the twilight books were based on Stephanie Meyers dream. Robert Pattinson doesn't like the books. (He said he felt like he was reading her love fantasy)

And as for popularity, there's just more appeal in Harry Potter. Branching out away from just teenage girls and middle-aged moms.

...whatever floats your boat, that's all I'll say...

soupoftomato · 2011-07-17 17:46:35

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
:l You guys just can't take the truth...
Lolwut.

What is this truth.

You realize these sales numbers are for ONE MOVIE, not the whole series right? The more books/movies arguement is invalid.

There is SACRIFICE for loved ones in Harry Potter. The romance argument is invalid.

And the twilight books were based on Stephanie Meyers dream. Robert Pattinson doesn't like the books. (He said he felt like he was reading her love fantasy)

And as for popularity, there's just more appeal in Harry Potter. Branching out away from just teenage girls and middle-aged moms.
...whatever floats your boat, that's all I'll say...

You appear to not be voicing an argument against me?

SuperYoshiluver13 · 2011-07-17 17:55:13

soupoftomato wrote:
SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:

Lolwut.

What is this truth.

You realize these sales numbers are for ONE MOVIE, not the whole series right? The more books/movies arguement is invalid.

There is SACRIFICE for loved ones in Harry Potter. The romance argument is invalid.

And the twilight books were based on Stephanie Meyers dream. Robert Pattinson doesn't like the books. (He said he felt like he was reading her love fantasy)

And as for popularity, there's just more appeal in Harry Potter. Branching out away from just teenage girls and middle-aged moms.
...whatever floats your boat, that's all I'll say...
You appear to not be voicing an argument against me?

I really don't want any haters on my back okay? So forget all this! Go ahead and diss Twilight all you want. Its your thread so whatever....

brettman98 · 2011-07-17 17:57:13

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:
brettman98 wrote:
SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

Okay, the shirtless scenes isn't really the ONLY thing that brings people in. Why do you like Harry Potter? Because it has cool effects! We are all evenly matched here no matter what you all say! And of course another reason why Harry Potter has more views is because there's like seven movies and twilight has like four or five. Its a good movie and I don't want to argue. And I'm not saying Harry Potter is bad. Harry Potter is a very well-thought out movie, I'm just defending the rights of Twilight. Thank you.
Funny, but you can really stop joking now
I go in there to see the vampires, the romance, the story, not everyone wants to see Taylor shirtless. I mean that's not the main reason why I want to see Twilight now seriously, stop being rude to movies, this can be very offensive to a certain 10 million people!

I didn't know they brainwashed so many people yikes

soupoftomato · 2011-07-17 18:00:11

Of COURSE I'll care if he actually dies irl, I'm not heartless.

gerbils800 · 2011-07-17 18:01:00

sparks wrote:
I personally prefer HP to Twilight. I think that twilight is generally preferred more by girls and since there is quite a minority of them on Scratch I think this thread is going to greatly favour HP

I'm disappointed that they're splitting the last twilight book into two parts, it's all about money making, just like the harry potter finale

Really? It looks like there's a lot of girls here on scratch...weird...
btw I'm a girl. tongue

Scratch

archived forums

#26 2011-07-17 12:39:26

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

gerbils800 wrote:

#27 2011-07-17 12:41:58

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

gerbils800 wrote:

DarkerWorld wrote:

#28 2011-07-17 12:57:47

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

#29 2011-07-17 14:35:38

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

#30 2011-07-17 14:56:00

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

#31 2011-07-17 14:58:17

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

#32 2011-07-17 15:01:52

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

sparks wrote:

#33 2011-07-17 15:06:30

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

pikachu1337 wrote:

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

#34 2011-07-17 17:07:33

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

pikachu1337 wrote:

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

#35 2011-07-17 17:15:14

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

#36 2011-07-17 17:16:55

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

brettman98 wrote:

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

pikachu1337 wrote:

#37 2011-07-17 17:22:44

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

soupoftomato wrote:

#38 2011-07-17 17:23:20

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

#39 2011-07-17 17:24:51

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

#40 2011-07-17 17:36:52

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

#41 2011-07-17 17:37:57

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

#42 2011-07-17 17:41:17

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

icerosethecat wrote:

gerbils800 wrote:

#43 2011-07-17 17:43:03

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

soupoftomato wrote:

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

#44 2011-07-17 17:45:19

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

#45 2011-07-17 17:45:23

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

soupoftomato wrote:

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

#46 2011-07-17 17:46:35

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

#47 2011-07-17 17:55:13

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

soupoftomato wrote:

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

#48 2011-07-17 17:57:13

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

SuperYoshiluver13 wrote:

#49 2011-07-17 18:00:11

Re: Fact: Harry Potter Is Better Than Twilight