This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2011-06-27 21:13:47

TVflea
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-14
Posts: 1000+

and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

http://fotos.fotoflexer.com/b7614cea2a17371feb917a474ff0045f.jpg
it has a tunnel that goes under water made completely out of glass and three lookout towers that are as tall as they can be. the picture is taken from one of them. the tall grey tower is the biggest one. the bridge going to the right leads to a beach house i can relax to. there is also a mine going down to the lava area. a sort of a sewage pipe goes into the cliff and to a pretend "water treatment plant"

Last edited by TVflea (2011-06-27 21:31:00)


-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. ! big_smile .
http://is.gd/YrQzXX

Offline

 

#2 2011-06-27 21:16:37

TVflea
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

made that all by my self with classic minecraft


-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. ! big_smile .
http://is.gd/YrQzXX

Offline

 

#3 2011-06-27 21:18:55

soupoftomato
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-18
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

Would've been cooler in Beta.


I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos

Offline

 

#4 2011-06-27 21:21:31

wiimaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-09-17
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

soupoftomato wrote:

Would've been cooler in Beta.


http://i584.photobucket.com/albums/ss286/wiimaster1/Wiimaster_zps107dca4c.gif

Offline

 

#5 2011-06-27 21:22:38

TVflea
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

soupoftomato wrote:

Would've been cooler in Beta.

no. beta is lame. you can't build any thing without obtaining something else


-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. ! big_smile .
http://is.gd/YrQzXX

Offline

 

#6 2011-06-27 21:35:31

soupoftomato
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-18
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

TVflea wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

Would've been cooler in Beta.

no. beta is lame. you can't build any thing without obtaining something else

It's called progression.

Beta panders to BOTH styles of players (those who adventure and those who build). It would've been cooler in beta do to the effort in cooking it, collecting it, etc.

AKA anything that big in Beta is amazing if legit

That's the equivalent of spawning in Beta. Which is fun, but I don't think people should be too credited for.


I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos

Offline

 

#7 2011-06-27 21:37:48

TVflea
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

soupoftomato wrote:

TVflea wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

Would've been cooler in Beta.

no. beta is lame. you can't build any thing without obtaining something else

It's called progression.

Beta panders to BOTH styles of players (those who adventure and those who build). It would've been cooler in beta do to the effort in cooking it, collecting it, etc.

AKA anything that big in Beta is amazing if legit

That's the equivalent of spawning in Beta. Which is fun, but I don't think people should be too credited for.

um, yeah.

look, cupcake, i don't like beta. and none of your trolling is going to change that


-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. ! big_smile .
http://is.gd/YrQzXX

Offline

 

#8 2011-06-27 21:41:53

The-Whiz
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-09
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

TVflea wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

TVflea wrote:


no. beta is lame. you can't build any thing without obtaining something else

It's called progression.

Beta panders to BOTH styles of players (those who adventure and those who build). It would've been cooler in beta do to the effort in cooking it, collecting it, etc.

AKA anything that big in Beta is amazing if legit

That's the equivalent of spawning in Beta. Which is fun, but I don't think people should be too credited for.

um, yeah.

look, cupcake, i don't like beta. and none of your trolling is going to change that

Hey, it's called an opinion. People are entitled to them.

Offline

 

#9 2011-06-27 21:49:39

upstairs
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-04-09
Posts: 89

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

what's the red thingy

Offline

 

#10 2011-06-27 21:51:14

RocksAndFire
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-04-17
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

TVflea wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

TVflea wrote:


no. beta is lame. you can't build any thing without obtaining something else

It's called progression.

Beta panders to BOTH styles of players (those who adventure and those who build). It would've been cooler in beta do to the effort in cooking it, collecting it, etc.

AKA anything that big in Beta is amazing if legit

That's the equivalent of spawning in Beta. Which is fun, but I don't think people should be too credited for.

um, yeah.

look, cupcake, i don't like beta. and none of your trolling is going to change that

cupcake? If you think calling someone that makes you cool...

Offline

 

#11 2011-06-27 22:41:59

MrMokey
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

The-Whiz wrote:

TVflea wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:


It's called progression.

Beta panders to BOTH styles of players (those who adventure and those who build). It would've been cooler in beta do to the effort in cooking it, collecting it, etc.

AKA anything that big in Beta is amazing if legit

That's the equivalent of spawning in Beta. Which is fun, but I don't think people should be too credited for.

um, yeah.

look, cupcake, i don't like beta. and none of your trolling is going to change that

Hey, it's called an opinion. People are entitled to them.

+1

Also, we never said classic was lame, its just that beta is better in a different way. Classic has the elements for building, but beta has the elements for a survival/roleplaying game, which more players prefer. I dont think that that counts as trolling, either.


http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa344/mrmokey1/Thankyouitfitsperfectlysig.png

Offline

 

#12 2011-06-28 00:21:22

nextstorm
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

Do you even have beta


bye

Offline

 

#13 2011-06-28 05:57:53

Guinea_Pig_Girl
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-25
Posts: 100+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

Wow, that sounds AWESOME! Can you share the .mine file?


http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/783/misstdd.png
Put this in your siggy if you miss The_Dancing_Donut!

Offline

 

#14 2011-06-28 07:53:08

degscratcher
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-01-02
Posts: 100+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

TVflea wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

TVflea wrote:


no. beta is lame. you can't build any thing without obtaining something else

It's called progression.

Beta panders to BOTH styles of players (those who adventure and those who build). It would've been cooler in beta do to the effort in cooking it, collecting it, etc.

AKA anything that big in Beta is amazing if legit

That's the equivalent of spawning in Beta. Which is fun, but I don't think people should be too credited for.

um, yeah.

look, cupcake, i don't like beta. and none of your trolling is going to change that

-1


If you want to keep the internet, vote no for SOPA and PIP. If you can't, tell your parents, your friends' parents! Sign petitions, do whatever you can! Say NOPA to SOPA!

Offline

 

#15 2011-06-28 07:58:43

degscratcher
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-01-02
Posts: 100+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

Beta people don't think classic is lame. But beta is better. In classic, you can only build, with no goal whatsoever, making many people get bored in a day or two.

In beta, not only can you build with MUCH more blocks, you actually have a goal: (Survive, and more importantly... HAVE FUN). Also, beta has much better smooth lighting, which it looks like classic doesn't even have.

Finally, beta has much better quality and less glitches. Structures in classic are measured in quantity, (which you have infinite of) while beta structures are measured in quality.

Last edited by degscratcher (2011-06-28 07:59:01)


If you want to keep the internet, vote no for SOPA and PIP. If you can't, tell your parents, your friends' parents! Sign petitions, do whatever you can! Say NOPA to SOPA!

Offline

 

#16 2011-06-28 08:13:36

ipodbiped
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-02-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

It depends on what you want to do. To build stuff: Classic. To simulate: Beta.

Offline

 

#17 2011-06-28 09:00:10

soft319
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-19
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

ipodbiped wrote:

It depends on what you want to do. To build stuff: Classic. To simulate: Beta.

+1
I never really thought Minecraft classic was lame.

Did you use a sponge block for the water tunnel?

Beta + TooManyItems mod = Classic minecraft + mobs and more blocks and items.


http://bluetetrarpg.web44.net/usercard/img.php?name=soft319

Offline

 

#18 2011-06-28 12:07:45

johndo77
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-07-30
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

I've been playing creative much more than beta now. Everything is lit, and you have infinite blocks!

And even with too many items, you have to wait for blocks to break when you hit them.


Crizapples

Offline

 

#19 2011-06-28 12:16:41

echs
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-03-18
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

TVflea wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

TVflea wrote:


no. beta is lame. you can't build any thing without obtaining something else

It's called progression.

Beta panders to BOTH styles of players (those who adventure and those who build). It would've been cooler in beta do to the effort in cooking it, collecting it, etc.

AKA anything that big in Beta is amazing if legit

That's the equivalent of spawning in Beta. Which is fun, but I don't think people should be too credited for.

um, yeah.

look, cupcake, i don't like beta. and none of your trolling is going to change that

Cupcake is mine > yikes
And if you think that's trolling be glad you weren't here last summer

And I thought you can't save anything in Classic
So that amazing creation goes bye-bye, right?


http://i45.tinypic.com/35m4llw.gif

Offline

 

#20 2011-06-28 13:24:55

illusionist
Retired Community Moderator
Registered: 2008-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

Calm down kids.

There is a reason beta Minecraft costs money though.


http://i.imgur.com/8LX1NrV.png

Offline

 

#21 2011-06-28 13:35:28

soupoftomato
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-18
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

echs wrote:

TVflea wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:


It's called progression.

Beta panders to BOTH styles of players (those who adventure and those who build). It would've been cooler in beta do to the effort in cooking it, collecting it, etc.

AKA anything that big in Beta is amazing if legit

That's the equivalent of spawning in Beta. Which is fun, but I don't think people should be too credited for.

um, yeah.

look, cupcake, i don't like beta. and none of your trolling is going to change that

Cupcake is mine > yikes
And if you think that's trolling be glad you weren't here last summer

And I thought you can't save anything in Classic
So that amazing creation goes bye-bye, right?

Nah you can.


I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos

Offline

 

#22 2011-06-28 14:30:58

Vurb
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-09
Posts: 100+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

TVflea wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

Would've been cooler in Beta.

no. beta is lame. you can't build any thing without obtaining something else

Life is lame, you can't do anything worthwile without obtaining something else.

Amirite?

Last edited by Vurb (2011-06-28 14:31:21)

Offline

 

#23 2011-06-28 15:09:20

GravityCatisalie
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-04-30
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

echs wrote:

And I thought you can't save anything in Classic
So that amazing creation goes bye-bye, right?

You can save if you legally bought the game.
Which I did.

Offline

 

#24 2011-06-28 15:39:00

degscratcher
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-01-02
Posts: 100+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

illusionist wrote:

Calm down kids.

There is a reason beta Minecraft costs money though.

Because it's much more epic?  big_smile


If you want to keep the internet, vote no for SOPA and PIP. If you can't, tell your parents, your friends' parents! Sign petitions, do whatever you can! Say NOPA to SOPA!

Offline

 

#25 2011-06-28 15:46:22

brettman98
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-10-17
Posts: 1000+

Re: and people thought classic Minecraft was lame

degscratcher wrote:

illusionist wrote:

Calm down kids.

There is a reason beta Minecraft costs money though.

Because it's much more epic?  big_smile

no, because humanity loves money.


http://i40.tinypic.com/n1wbr7.jpg

Offline

 

Board footer