meew0 wrote:
I'm a developer
![]()
And, why is Linux not user-friendly?
Maybe because there's no support team :S
Offline
So I'm a loser eh, and I can't do graphic design because I don't have a Mac, even though I love graphics.
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
So I'm a loser eh, and I can't do graphic design because I don't have a Mac, even though I love graphics.
:'(
this chart sucks
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
So I'm a loser eh, and I can't do graphic design because I don't have a Mac, even though I love graphics.
:'(
this chart sucks
+1 hehehe
Last edited by Chrischb (2011-06-16 01:46:22)
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
So I'm a loser eh, and I can't do graphic design because I don't have a Mac, even though I love graphics.
:'(
this chart sucks+1 hehehe
Keep going and this topic is gonna be closed
btw I think trying out a friends mac or trying out a mac at a shop counts so ...
win + mac = graphic designer
Offline
If I was making an OS I'd make little updates every know and then, like Minecraft.
Offline
*Ahem*
I know Windows is a loser, but you offend me by saying I'm the loser because I have no money to spend on Linux and Macintosh, thus I develop applications and stuff.
Offline
rdococ wrote:
*Ahem*
I know Windows is a loser, but you offend me by saying I'm the loser because I have no money to spend on Linux and Macintosh, thus I develop applications and stuff.
*AHEM*
Linux is free...
Offline
I use Mac OS X and WIndows, but I'm not a Graphic Designer. I'm a developer. Oh, and that wasn't regarding personality. I'm working on a Flash Game and learning Unity.
Offline
I Am Not A Loser!
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
IHeartGaming wrote:
Mostly Linux (Ubuntu), sometimes Windoze.
![]()
BTW, I'm not a geek or developer...in a programming community this is not frowned upon.
![]()
But I am good with computers...
Also, Linux (at least the *buntu distros) are good for making an old PC as good as new. My 7 year old Windoze box on XP takes 45 minutes to boot, and Ubuntu takes, eh, 2.
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
rdococ wrote:
*Ahem*
I know Windows is a loser, but you offend me by saying I'm the loser because I have no money to spend on Linux and Macintosh, thus I develop applications and stuff.*AHEM*
Linux is free...![]()
+1
Offline
I've used them all - (well, not Linux, but various other flavors of Unix) - plus a bunch of others. All OS's are just tools for running your computer. They don't define the user in any way, shape, or form. Some of them may be better for certain applications than others, of course.
I'm sure these charts are intended to be humorous and should not be taken seriously.
Offline
Paddle2See wrote:
I've used them all - (well, not Linux, but various other flavors of Unix) - plus a bunch of others. All OS's are just tools for running your computer. They don't define the user in any way, shape, or form. Some of them may be better for certain applications than others, of course.
I'm sure these charts are intended to be humorous and should not be taken seriously.
Who is taking them seriously?
Paddle is a hacker! lol.
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
meew0 wrote:
I'm a developer
![]()
And, why is Linux not user-friendly?Maybe because there's no support team :S
Actually, Linux arguable has a much better support staff than Windows or OS X: The entire open-source community.
fire219 wrote:
Developers FTW!
![]()

Offline
Let's see... Windows 7 all the time since it's reliable and customizable, and Mac just because I love to develop apps in Xcode, and Linux occasionally because it's just plain cool. That doesn't make me a hacker!!
I made this post an hour ago and forgot about it, now I have to wait for the 60 second rule.
Offline
LS97 wrote:
I made this post an hour ago and forgot about it, now I have to wait for the 60 second rule.
So many times I have done that...
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
rdococ wrote:
*Ahem*
I know Windows is a loser, but you offend me by saying I'm the loser because I have no money to spend on Linux and Macintosh, thus I develop applications and stuff.*AHEM*
Linux is free...![]()
*Ahem*
But another computer isn't...
Offline
rdococ wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
rdococ wrote:
*Ahem*
I know Windows is a loser, but you offend me by saying I'm the loser because I have no money to spend on Linux and Macintosh, thus I develop applications and stuff.*AHEM*
Linux is free...![]()
*Ahem*
But another computer isn't...
*Ahem*
You can install Linux so it's on the same computer and works like any other Windows application.
Offline
Wow I'm a loser. Argh, I want a Mac anyway.
But its too expensive.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
rdococ wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
*AHEM*
Linux is free...![]()
*Ahem*
But another computer isn't...*Ahem*
You can install Linux so it's on the same computer and works like any other Windows application.
*Ahem*
If it's fullscreen, I have no hope with Linux as an application.
Offline
rdococ wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
rdococ wrote:
*Ahem*
But another computer isn't...*Ahem*
You can install Linux so it's on the same computer and works like any other Windows application.*Ahem*
If it's fullscreen, I have no hope with Linux as an application.
*Ahem*
Why, because you want to run both at once?
Offline