Scratch
archived forums
#101 2011-06-15 08:44:25
- rabbit1131
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-10-16
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
My Dearest TVflea, they took down a harmless Scratch project and some kid got a DMCA notice... Nomco was being paranoid!!! THAT'S IT
Last edited by rabbit1131 (2011-06-15 08:45:15)
The Intergalactic Adventures of Revesilia! I hope you will partake in this gigantic undertaking, to build the sequel to the hit map The Adventures of Revesilia! The Intergalactic Adventures of Revesilia Map Builders Application thread!
Offline
#102 2011-06-15 08:48:41
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
rabbit1131 wrote:
My Dearest TVflea, they took down a harmless Scratch project and some kid got a DMCA notice... Nomco was being paranoid!!! THAT'S IT
the dmca notice was because pacman is trade mark(ever see the (R)?)
-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. !
.Offline
#103 2011-06-15 08:54:16
- rabbit1131
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-10-16
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
*rolleyes* (rolleyes) Then why didn't they terminate Google? Physicsgames, and five thousand other remakes?
The Intergalactic Adventures of Revesilia! I hope you will partake in this gigantic undertaking, to build the sequel to the hit map The Adventures of Revesilia! The Intergalactic Adventures of Revesilia Map Builders Application thread!
Offline
#104 2011-06-15 08:57:42
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
rabbit1131 wrote:
*rolleyes* (rolleyes) Then why didn't they terminate Google? Physicsgames, and five thousand other remakes?
because those were good.the project wasn't so they probably felt insaulted
Last edited by TVflea (2011-06-15 08:58:23)
-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. !
.Offline
#105 2011-06-15 09:05:21
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
TVflea wrote:
rabbit1131 wrote:
*rolleyes* (rolleyes) Then why didn't they terminate Google? Physicsgames, and five thousand other remakes?
because those were good.the project wasn't so they probably felt insaulted
*resists posting picture of troll*
Offline
#106 2011-06-15 09:08:45
- Earthboundjeff
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-09-28
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
Fair use, tvtroll.
Offline
#107 2011-06-15 09:23:26
#108 2011-06-15 09:30:12
- rabbit1131
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-10-16
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
TVflea wrote:
Earthboundjeff wrote:
Fair use, tvtroll.
elf-found-deaf
STOP FIGHTING. Gee... Listen, many of us thing Namco did something unfair. So we are gonna protest and boycott. Civilly. Not like those people in Madison who are destroying the Capitol and destroying events like the Special Olympics. Got it?
Last edited by rabbit1131 (2011-06-15 09:55:21)
The Intergalactic Adventures of Revesilia! I hope you will partake in this gigantic undertaking, to build the sequel to the hit map The Adventures of Revesilia! The Intergalactic Adventures of Revesilia Map Builders Application thread!
Offline
#109 2011-06-15 09:39:59
- scratch_yoshi
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-06-12
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
TVflea wrote:
namco dosen't hate scratch
i don't think you email them anything. they didn't do anything to you.
+9001.
Retired from Scratch, but just the language itself. Not the forums.
Offline
#110 2011-06-15 10:10:25
#111 2011-06-15 10:19:01
#112 2011-06-15 11:56:11
- TornFusion
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-09-03
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
TVflea wrote:
rabbit1131 wrote:
My Dearest TVflea, they took down a harmless Scratch project and some kid got a DMCA notice... Nomco was being paranoid!!! THAT'S IT
the dmca notice was because pacman is trade mark(ever see the (R)?)
Yeah, but do you see Nintendo doing that? NO.
Because some companies are glad to think that they are an inspiration.
Offline
#113 2011-06-15 12:14:56
- brettman98
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-10-17
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
TornFusion wrote:
TVflea wrote:
rabbit1131 wrote:
My Dearest TVflea, they took down a harmless Scratch project and some kid got a DMCA notice... Nomco was being paranoid!!! THAT'S IT
the dmca notice was because pacman is trade mark(ever see the (R)?)
Yeah, but do you see Nintendo doing that? NO.
Because some companies are glad to think that they are an inspiration.
well maybe namco doesn't like people ripping off a trademark game.
What do you people think you're going to do? Give them a few prank calls and claim you won? 
Offline
#114 2011-06-15 12:31:37
- Earthboundjeff
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-09-28
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
If Ihave to say this one more time I will scream.
THEY HAVE NO RIGHT SCRATCH IS EDUCATIONAL FAIR USE APPLIES THAT MEANS THAT THEY WERE IN THE WRONG THE KID WAS NOT DOING ANYHTING WRONG BECAUSE TRADEMARKS DON'T APPLY HERE BECAUSE IT IS EDUCATIONAL THEREFORE THEY WERE WRONG AND THEY DON'T DESERVE OUR BUSINESS. NOW PLEASE GET OUT OF THE THREAD IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT BECAUSE WE ARE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING HERE.
Offline
#115 2011-06-15 12:38:29
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
fire219 wrote:
3DSfan12345 wrote:
I got a domain.
namcoisevil.tk
Note it's spelled NAMCO.I don't know how many times we have to say this:
We know it is spelled like that, but spell it Nomco, to make fun of Namco.
@rdococ
@the url: It's not working.
Offline
#116 2011-06-15 12:39:29
- brettman98
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-10-17
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
Earthboundjeff wrote:
If Ihave to say this one more time I will scream.
THEY HAVE NO RIGHT SCRATCH IS EDUCATIONAL FAIR USE APPLIES THAT MEANS THAT THEY WERE IN THE WRONG THE KID WAS NOT DOING ANYHTING WRONG BECAUSE TRADEMARKS DON'T APPLY HERE BECAUSE IT IS EDUCATIONAL THEREFORE THEY WERE WRONG AND THEY DON'T DESERVE OUR BUSINESS. NOW PLEASE GET OUT OF THE THREAD IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT BECAUSE WE ARE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING HERE.
well they obviously are able to do it, because they did
Offline
#117 2011-06-15 12:58:52
- 3DSfan12345
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-04-02
- Posts: 500+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
R.I.P Scratch 1.4
July 7,2009-May 5,2013
Offline
#118 2011-06-15 13:00:04
- Earthboundjeff
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-09-28
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
brettman98 wrote:
Earthboundjeff wrote:
If Ihave to say this one more time I will scream.
THEY HAVE NO RIGHT SCRATCH IS EDUCATIONAL FAIR USE APPLIES THAT MEANS THAT THEY WERE IN THE WRONG THE KID WAS NOT DOING ANYHTING WRONG BECAUSE TRADEMARKS DON'T APPLY HERE BECAUSE IT IS EDUCATIONAL THEREFORE THEY WERE WRONG AND THEY DON'T DESERVE OUR BUSINESS. NOW PLEASE GET OUT OF THE THREAD IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT BECAUSE WE ARE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING HERE.well they obviously are able to do it, because they did
BUT.IT.WAS.WRONG.FOR.THEM.TO.DO.IT.
THATS THE POINT.
Offline
#119 2011-06-15 13:11:16
- brettman98
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-10-17
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
Earthboundjeff wrote:
brettman98 wrote:
Earthboundjeff wrote:
If Ihave to say this one more time I will scream.
THEY HAVE NO RIGHT SCRATCH IS EDUCATIONAL FAIR USE APPLIES THAT MEANS THAT THEY WERE IN THE WRONG THE KID WAS NOT DOING ANYHTING WRONG BECAUSE TRADEMARKS DON'T APPLY HERE BECAUSE IT IS EDUCATIONAL THEREFORE THEY WERE WRONG AND THEY DON'T DESERVE OUR BUSINESS. NOW PLEASE GET OUT OF THE THREAD IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT BECAUSE WE ARE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING HERE.well they obviously are able to do it, because they did
BUT.IT.WAS.WRONG.FOR.THEM.TO.DO.IT.
THATS THE POINT.
well good luck convincing them of that
ps: DON"T.SHOUT.
YOU.SOUND.LIKE.BG1000.
Offline
#120 2011-06-15 13:13:48
- Earthboundjeff
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-09-28
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
Grrrrrrrrr......ijbijbhskdjuwosjisidisskisiwjehqodnidyejfosmjc...!
>:O
Last edited by Earthboundjeff (2011-06-15 13:14:13)
Offline
#121 2011-06-15 13:19:23
- agscratcher
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-09
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
brettman98 wrote:
ps: DON"T.SHOUT.
YOU.SOUND.LIKE.BG1000.
For once, I agree.
But they DID break international law.
Offline
#122 2011-06-15 13:31:20
- brettman98
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-10-17
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
Earthboundjeff wrote:
Grrrrrrrrr......ijbijbhskdjuwosjisidisskisiwjehqodnidyejfosmjc...!
>
well now you just sound ridiculous...
Offline
#123 2011-06-15 13:37:25
- brettman98
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-10-17
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
agscratcher wrote:
brettman98 wrote:
ps: DON"T.SHOUT.
YOU.SOUND.LIKE.BG1000.For once, I agree.
But they DID break international law.
well then why doesn't international law arrest them?
Offline
#124 2011-06-15 15:13:22
- martianshark
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2008-03-24
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
brettman98 wrote:
agscratcher wrote:
brettman98 wrote:
ps: DON"T.SHOUT.
YOU.SOUND.LIKE.BG1000.For once, I agree.
But they DID break international law.well then why doesn't international law arrest them?
That doesn't make sense.
Offline
#125 2011-06-15 20:35:51
Re: Project Pac-Man: Main thread
rabbit1131 wrote:
*rolleyes* (rolleyes) Then why didn't they terminate Google? Physicsgames, and five thousand other remakes?
They might have asked for permission and paid a lot of money... but anyway, this is a KID's project. And there are many young people on Scratch who won't understand this whole concept. NAMCO should forgive them. Or should I say... NOMCO? *starts laughing really hard*
Offline